BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Author
Babczuk Arkadiusz, Dudek Andrzej
Title
Wybór formuły przetargowej na skarbowe papiery wartościowe
The Forms of Auctioning Treasury Securities
Source
Gospodarka Narodowa, 2007, nr 10, s. 85-107, tabl., rys., bibliogr. 30 poz.
Keyword
Papiery wartościowe, Przetargi, Konkurencyjność, Bony skarbowe
Securities, Tenders, Competitiveness, Treasury bill
Note
summ.
Abstract
Przedmiotem niniejszego opracowania jest prezentacja konsekwencji zastosowania przetargu z ceną jednolitą oraz przetargu z cenami zróżnicowanymi w warunkach polskich. W pracy wykorzystano metodę badawczą zaproponowaną przez Kim, Oh, Ryu [2004], którzy to autorzy podjęli próbę oceny zasadności zmiany formatu przetargowego w Korei Południowej [Kim, Oh, Ryu, 2004]. Badanie to ma charakter wstępny. Uwzględniono w nim jedynie dwa typy instrumentów skarbowych: dwuletnie obligacje zerokuponowe oraz roczne bony skarbowe. W kolejnych opracowaniach pula analizowanych skarbowych papierów wartościowych zostanie rozszerzona. Autorzy są także świadomi ograniczeń w implementacji wybranej metody wynikających z ograniczonej płynności publicznego elektronicznego rynku skarbowych papierów wartościowych. (abstrakt oryginalny)

The article discusses methods used in auctioning Treasury securities in Poland. Treasury auctions are widely used by authorities responsible for the management of public debt. The authors of the paper set out to identify auction mechanisms that maximize the expected income of the seller. The paper shows the effects of the single- and multiple-price auction systems in Poland. The authors use a research method developed by G.R. Kim, S. Oh and K. Ryu. Babczuk and Dudek conclude that the single-price auction system is safer for the issuer because revenue from single-price auctions is in most cases higher than that generated from multiple-price auction systems. At the same time, due to imperfect research methods, especially in estimating the issuer’s revenue from a single-price auction system, further in-depth studies are needed into methods for carrying out auctions for T-securities in Poland, the authors conclude. (original absrtact)
Accessibility
The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics
The Library of Warsaw School of Economics
The Library of University of Economics in Katowice
The Main Library of Poznań University of Economics and Business
The Main Library of the Wroclaw University of Economics
Bibliography
Show
  1. Babczuk A., [2007], Procedury przetargowe w zarządzaniu długiem publicznym, Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej we Wrocławiu, Wrocław.
  2. Back K., Zender J., [1993], Auctions of Divisible Goods: On the Rationale for the Treasury Expenment, "Review of Financial Studies", Vol. 6, nr 4.
  3. Bartolini L., Cottarelli C., [1997], Designing Effective Auctions for Treasury Securities, "Current Issues in Economics and Finance", Vol. 3, nr 9.
  4. Bikhchandani S., [1999], Auctions of Heterogeneous Objects, "Games and Economic Behavior", Vol. 26, nr 2.
  5. Bikhchandani S., Huang C., [1989], Auctions with Resale Markets: An Exploratory Model of Treasury Bills Auctions, "Review of Financial Studies", Vol. 2, nr 3.
  6. Bikhchandani S., Huang C., [1993], The Economics of Treasury Securities Markets, "Journal of Economic Perspectives", Vol. 7, nr 3.
  7. Bikhchandani S., Edsparr P, Huang C., [2000], The Treasury Bill Auction and the When-Issued Market: Some Evidence, Decisions, Operations, and Technology Management, Paper SB09, University of California, Los Angeles.
  8. Castellanos S., [2001a], Mexican Treasury Securities Primary Auctions, "Theory Workshop Paper", nr 357966000000000025, UCLA Department of Economics, Los Angeles.
  9. Castellanos S., [2001b], A New Empirical Study of the Mexican Treasury Securities Primary Auctions: Is There More Underpricing?, "Levine's Working Paper Archive", nr 625018000000000206, UCLA Department of Economics, Los Angeles.
  10. Chari V., Weber R., [1992], How the U.S. Treasury Should Auction Its Debt, "Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review", Vol. 16, nr 4.
  11. Das S., Sundaram R., [1997], Auction Theory: A Summary with Applications to Treasury Markets, "NBER Working Paper" nr 5873, Cambridge.
  12. Engelmann D., Grimm V, [2004], Bidding Behavior in Multi-Unit Auctions - An Expenmental Investigation and some Theoretical Insights, "Working Paper" nr 12/2004, University of Alicante, Alicante.
  13. Friedman M., [1959], Testimony in Employment, Growth and Price Levels, Hearings before the Joint Economic Committee, 86th Congress American Economic Association.
  14. Friedman M., [1960], Program form Monetary Stability, Fordham University Press, New York.
  15. Friedman M., [1964], Comment on Collusion in the Auction Market for Treasury Bills, "Journal of Political Economy", Vol. 72, nr 5.
  16. Friedman M., [August 28, 1991], How to Sell Government Securities, "Wall Street Journal".
  17. Hortaçsu A., [2002], Mechanism Choice and Strategic Bidding in Divisible Good Auctions: An Empirical Analysis of the Turkish Treasury Auction Market, University of Chicago, Chicago (mimeo).
  18. Joint Report on the Government Securities Market, [1992], Department of the Treasury, Securities Exchange Commission, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington D.C.
  19. Kastl J., [2005], Discrete Bids and Empirical Inference in Divisible Good Auctions, Northwestern University, Chicago.
  20. Kim G.-R., Oh S., Ryu K., [2004], Discriminatory vs. Uniform Price Auction Revenue. Comparison in the Case of the Korean Treasury Auction Market, "Econometric Society Far Eastern Meetings" nr 539.
  21. Lengwiler Y., [1999], The Multiple Unit Auction Variable Supply, "Economic Theory", Vol. 14, nr 2, s. 373-392.
  22. Malvey P., Archibal C., [1998], Uniform-Price Auctions: Update of the Treasury Experience, US Treasury Department, Washington D.C.
  23. McAfee P., McMillan J.( [1987a], Auctions and Bidding, "Journal of Economic Literature", Vol. 30, nr 2.
  24. McAfee P., McMillan J., [1987b], Auctions with Entry, "Economics Letters", Vol. 23.
  25. Milgrom P., Weber R., [1982], A Theory of Auctions and Competitive Bidding, "Econometrica", Vol. 50, nr 5.
  26. Nandi S., [4th quarter 1997], Treasury Auctions: What Do the Recent Models and Results Tell Us?, "Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Economic Review".
  27. Smith C., [1992], Economics and Ethics: The Case of Salomon Brothers, "Journal of Applied Corporate Finance", Vol. 5, nr 1.
  28. Vickrey W., [1961], Counter speculation, Auctions, and Competitive Sealed Tenders, "Journal of Finance", Vol. 16, nr 1.
  29. Wang J., Zender J., [2002], Auctioning Divisible Good, "Economic Theory", Vol. 19, nr 4.
  30. Wilson R., [1977], A Bidding Model of Perfect Competition, "Review of Economic Studies", Vol. 44, nr 3.
Cited by
Show
ISSN
0867-0005
Language
pol
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu