BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Author
Konat Grzegorz
Title
Strategiczne rozwidlanie w tworzeniu Wolnego i Otwartego Oprogramowania
Strategic Forking in the Development of Free/Open-Source Software
Source
Gospodarka Narodowa, 2008, nr 10, s. 23-43, bibliogr. 41 poz.
Keyword
Oprogramowanie komputerowe, Otwarte oprogramowanie, Programowanie komputerów, Procesy innowacyjne
Computer software, Open source, Computer programming, Innovation processes
Note
summ.
Abstract
W artykule omówiono trend w rozwoju oprogramowania komputerowego znany jako „strategiczne rozwidlenie”. Autor przedstawia mikroekonomiczną analizę tego zagadnienia żeby dociec powodów dla których programiści biorą udział w projektach Wolnego i Otwartego Oprogramowania. Analiza skupia się na definicji strategicznego rozwidlenia, warunków określających ten trend oraz jego bezpośrednie przyczyny. Autor zwraca także uwagę na konsekwencje strategicznego rozwidlenia i czynniki z powodu których to podejście nie stało się bardziej rozpowszechnione na świecie.

The paper discusses a trend in the development of computer software known as “strategic forking.” This trend is an intrinsic feature of today’s “open-source community,” according to Konat. To begin with, the article defines the term “source code” in reference to software” and it also explains the terms “open source” and “free software.” Moreover, it introduces the definition of Free/Open-Source Software (FOSS). In the following part of the article, Konat offers a microeconomic analysis of “strategic forking” to determine the motives guiding software engineers taking part in FOSS projects. The problem is discussed from the perspective of the theory of public goods, the demand-side approach to innovation, and other theories concerned with issues such as “hackers’ ethic” and “ego boosting.” Konat pays special attention to describing the “strategic forking” phenomenon with the use of classical microeconomic and enterprise theory tools developed by researchers Jean Tirole and Josh Lerner. The author follows up with a comprehensive analysis of strategic forking as a key to explaining a fundamental discrepancy in the assessment of the motives that guide programmers taking part in the development of open-source software. The analysis focuses on the definition of strategic forking, the conditions determining this trend and its direct causes. Konat also looks at the implications of strategic forking and the factors due to which this approach has not become more widespread around the world. The article closes with a review of issues that require further analysis, according to Konat. These include the issue of software distribution. (original abstract)
Accessibility
The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics
The Library of Warsaw School of Economics
The Library of University of Economics in Katowice
The Main Library of Poznań University of Economics and Business
The Main Library of the Wroclaw University of Economics
Bibliography
Show
  1. Baldwin C.Y, Clark K.B., [June 2003], Does Code Architecture Mitigate Free Riding in the Open Source Development Model?, working paper, Harvard Business School.
  2. Crowston K., Howison J., [November 2004], The social structure of Free and Open Source software, Syracuse FLOSS research working paper.
  3. Dalie J-M., David P.M., [2003], The Allocation of Software Development Resources in "Open Source" Production Mode, SIEPR Discussion Paper, No. 02-27.
  4. DiBona C., Ockman S., Stone M., [1999], Introduction to Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution, [w:] DiBona C., Ockman S., Stone M. (red.), Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution, O'Reilly and Associates, Beijing.
  5. Feller J., Fitzgerald B., [2000], A Framework Analysis Of The Open Source Software Development Paradigm, [w:] International Conference on Information Systems, Association for Information Systems, Atlanta, pp. 58-59.
  6. Free Software Foundation, [1996], The Free Software Definition, Free Software Foundation Inc., Boston.
  7. Gacek Ch., Lawrie T., Arief B., [January-February 2004], The many meanings of Open Source, IEEE, Vol. 21, pp. 34-40.
  8. Ghosh R.A., [2002], Clustering and Dependencies in Free/Open Source Software Development: Methodology and Preliminary Analysis, A paper presented at the conference "Open Source Software: Economics, Law and Policy", Toulouse, France, June 20-21.
  9. Gravelle H., Rees R., [2004], Microeconomics, Pearson Education, Harlow.
  10. Henkel J., Tins M., [May 2004], Munich/MIT Survey: Development of Embedded Linux, Institute for Innovation Research, Technology Management and Entrepreneurship, University of Munich.
  11. von Hippel E., [1988], The Sources of Innovation, Oxford University Press, New York.
  12. von Hippel E., [April 1994], 'Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation, Management Science 40/4, pp. 429-439.
  13. Hirsch F, [1976], The Social Limits to Growth, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
  14. Johnson J. P, [May 2001], Economics of Open Source Software, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  15. Kenwood C., [July 2001], A Business Case Study of Open Source Software, The MITRE Corporation.
  16. Kieseppa LA., [2002], Open Source Software and Economics, working paper, SoberIT, Helsinki University of Technology.
  17. Kogut B., Metiu A., [2001], Open-Source Software Development and Distributed Innovation, "Oxford Review of Economic Policy", Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 248-264.
  18. Kuan J., [2002], Open source Software as Lead User's Make of Buy Decision: A Study of Open and Closed Source Quality, A paper presented at the conference "Open Source Software: Economics, Law and Policy", Toulouse, France, June 20-21.
  19. Lancashire D., [2001], Code, Culture and Cash: The Fading Altruism of Open Source Development, First Monday 6.
  20. Lanzara F.G., Morner M., [2003], The Knowledge Ecology of Open-Source Software Projects, Preliminary Draft presented at the 19th European Group of Organizational Studies (EGOS) Colloquium, Copenhagen, July 3-5.
  21. Lerner J., Tirole J., [2002], Some Simple Economics of Open Source, "The Journal of Industrial Economics", No. 50, pp. 197-234.
  22. Lerner J., Tirole J., [December 2004], The Economics Of Technology Sharing: Open Source And Beyond, Working Paper 10956, NBER Working Paper Series.
  23. Levy S., [1984], Hackers: Heroes of the Computer Revolution, Penguin Books, New York.
  24. Maurer S.M., Scotchmer S., [April 2006], Open Source Software: The New Intellectual Property Paradigm, Working Paper 12148, NBER Working Paper Series.
  25. McGowan D., [2001], Legal Implications Of Open-Source Software, University of Illinois Law Review, No. l, pp. 242-304.
  26. Mundie C., [2002], Security: Source Access and the Software Ecosystem, A paper presented at the conference "Open Source Software: Economics, Law and Policy", Toulouse, France, June 20-21.
  27. Nakakoji K., Yamamoto Y, Nishinaka Y, Kishida K., Ye Y, [2002], Evolution Patterns of Open-Source Software Systems and Communities, Proceedings of the International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution.
  28. Nuvolari A.; [January 2003], Open source software development: some historical perspectives, Working Paper 03.01, Eindhoven Centre for Innovation Studies.
  29. Pianon A., [February 2004], Trade Secret Vs. Open Source: And The Winner Is..., Erasmus Law and Economic Review, No. l, pp. 47-75.
  30. Raymond E.S., [1999a], Homesteading the Noosphere, First Monday 310.
  31. Raymond E.S., [1999b], The Magic Cauldron, [w:] The Cathedral and the Bazaar, First Monday 33.
  32. Raymond E.S., [2001], The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary, Revised Edition, O'Reilly, Beijing.
  33. Reagle Jr. J.M., [2003], Socialization in Open Technical Communities, working paper.
  34. Rossi M.A., [April 2004], Decoding the "Free/Open Source (F/OSS) SoftwarePuzzle" a survey of theoretical and empirical contributions, Dipartimento di Economia Politica, Universita di Siena, Working Paper N. 424.
  35. Saint-Paul G., [2002], Growth Effects of Mon-Proprietary Innovation, A paper presented at the conference "Open Source Software: Economics, Law and Policy", Toulouse, France, June 20-21.
  36. Stallman R.M., [2001], The GNU project.
  37. Stenborg M., [2004], Explaining Open Source, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy Discussion Papers.
  38. Tuomi L, [May 2000], Learning from Linux: Internet, Innovation, and the New Economy. Empirical and Descriptive Analysis of the Open Source Model, KNEXUS Menlo Circle, Berkeley.
  39. Varian H.R., Shapiro C., [December 2003] Linux Adoption in the Public Sector: An Economic Analysis, working paper.
  40. Weber S., [June 2000], The Political Economy of Open Source Software, BRIE Working Paper 140.
  41. Weber S., [December 2003], Open Source Software in Developing Economies, working paper, University of California, Berkeley.
Cited by
Show
ISSN
0867-0005
Language
pol
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu