BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Author
Bratnicki Mariusz
Title
Pomiędzy akademią a przedsiębiorstwem, czyli o upraszczaniu i komplikowaniu teorii zarządzania
Between an Academic Theory and an Enterprise I.E. about Simplification and Complication af Management Theory
Source
Prace Naukowe Akademii Ekonomicznej we Wrocławiu, 2004, nr 1014, s. 17-24, rys., tab., bibliogr. 12 poz.
Issue title
Nowe kierunki w zarządzaniu przedsiębiorstwem : między teorią a praktyką
Keyword
Teorie zarządzania, Efektywność, Metodologia organizacji i zarządzania
Management theories, Effectiveness, Organisation and management methodology
Note
summ.
Abstract
Przeanalizowano zagadnienie teorii zarządzania. Dokonano porównania poziomów złożoności teorii zarządzania. Pokazano jakie są naciski związane z rozrastaniem się badań i jednomyślnością.

This paper focuses on theoretical problems located between theory and practice of management. There are four parts in it. First, phases of management theory development are described. Then, attention is focused on the need of growth of theoretical background complexity. Next, key problems of traditional approach are indicated and some solutions suggested. At the end, the methodological plurality is described, with the emphasis on its necessity in contemporary discussions in the field of management.(original abstract)
Accessibility
The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics
The Library of Warsaw School of Economics
The Library of University of Economics in Katowice
The Main Library of Poznań University of Economics and Business
The Main Library of the Wroclaw University of Economics
Bibliography
Show
  1. Bratnicki M. (1983): Proces uczenia się w kierowaniu doskonaleniem organizacji. UMCS, Lublin.
  2. Bratnicki M. (1993): Doskonalenie procesu zarządzania w przedsiębiorstwie. Podejście zintegrowane. AE, Katowice.
  3. Drucker P.F. (1954): The Practice of Management. A Study of the Most Important Function in American Society. Harper & Row, New York.
  4. Eisenhardt K.M., Sull D.N. (2001): Strategy as Simple Rules. "Harvard Business Review" nr 1, s. 107-116.
  5. Fabian F.H. (2000): Keeping the Tension: Pressures to Keep Controversy in the Management Discipline. "Academy of Management Review" nr 2, s. 350-371.
  6. Fletcher J., Olwyler K. (1997): Paradoxical Thinking. How to Profit from Your Contradictions. Ber-ret-Koehler Publishers, Inc., San Francisco.
  7. Foster R., Kaplan S. (2001): Creative Destruction: Why Companies That Are Built to Last Underperform the Market - And How to Successfully Transform Them. Currency/Doubleday, New York.
  8. Harryson S.J. (2000): Managing Know-Who Based Companies. A Multinetworked Approach to Knowledge and Innovation Management. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, s. 150 i dalsze.
  9. Magretta J. (2002): What management is: How it works and why it's everyone's business. The Free Press, New York.
  10. Oberholzer A., Roberts V.Z. (1995): The Unconscious at Work: Individual and Organizational Stress in the Human Services. Routledge, London.
  11. Ofori-Dankwa J., Julian S.D. (2001): Complexifying Organizational Theory: Illustrations Using Time Research. "Academy of Management Review" nr 5, s. 415-430.
  12. Zohar D. (1997): ReWiring the Corporate Brain. Using the New Science to Rethink How We Structure and Lead Organizations. Berret-Koehler Publisher Inc., San Francisco, s. 137-144.
Cited by
Show
ISSN
0324-8445
Language
pol
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu