BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Author
Czarny Elżbieta (Warsaw School of Economics, Poland), Menkes Jerzy (Warsaw School of Economics, Poland), Toporowski Patryk (Warsaw School of Economics, Poland)
Title
Gazprom - threat to Europe?
Source
Poznań University of Economics Review, 2009, vol. 9, nr 1, s. 44-66, rys., tab., bibliogr. 24 poz.
Keyword
Przedsiębiorstwo międzynarodowe, Konkurencja niedoskonała, Przemysł gazowniczy
International enterprise, Imperfect competition, Gas industry
Company
Gazprom
Country
Europa
Europe
Abstract
The dominant part of production and dispatch of natural gas goes through Gazprom, a company controlled by the state authorities of Russia. We analyze the threats resulting from the strengthening economic and political position of Gazprom. We analyze the most important symptoms of Gazprom's increasing market power (international price discrimination, elimination of competitors, overtaking companies on the related markets) making it a natural monopolist on the Europe an market of natural gas and its dispatch. We analyze Gazprom's ownership structure demonstrating increasing interdependence between the firm and Russia. We discuss potential scenarios of using Gazprom's supplies of gas as a weapon against European countries. (original abstract)
Accessibility
The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics
The Library of Warsaw School of Economics
The Library of University of Economics in Katowice
The Main Library of Poznań University of Economics and Business
The Main Library of the Wroclaw University of Economics
Full text
Show
Bibliography
Show
  1. Applebaum A. (2008), Rosją rządzi kaprys jednostek, Gazeta Wyborcza, 10 July 2008.
  2. Besançon A. (1984), Anatomia widm, Krąg, Warszawa.
  3. Blum W. (2000), Cover of Roque State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower, Common Courage Book.
  4. Brzeziński Z. (2008), Komunizm, kapitalizm, Putinizm, Gazeta Wyborcza, 30 April-1 May 2008 i 10-11 May 2008.
  5. Country Report Russia, The Economist Inteligence Unit Limited, different volumes.
  6. Haliżak E., Kuźniar R. (2006), Niekonwencjonalne sposoby regulacji w stosunkach międzynarodowych, in: Stosunki międzynarodowe. Geneza, struktura, dynamika, Wydawnictwo UW, Warszawa.
  7. Kissinger H. (1996), Dyplomacja, Philips Wilson, Warszawa.
  8. Kublik A. (2008), Wielki brat Gazprom, Gazeta Wyborcza, 13 May 2008, http://gospodarka.gazeta.pl/gospodarka/1,33207,5209269.html.
  9. Kuchciak Z. (2007), Gazpromowy Nord Stream realnym zagrożeniem dla PGNiG?, Rzeczpospolita, 17 December 2007, http://www.rp.pl/artykul/78002.html.
  10. Madej M. (2004), Globalizacja zagrożeń asymetrycznych, in: Globalizacja a stosunki międzynarodowe, E. Haliżak, R. Kuźniar, J. Symonides (eds.).
  11. Negri A., Hardt M. (2000), Empire, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, London.
  12. Nore P. (2004), Oil and Development, in: Covering Globalization. A Handbook for Reporters, A. Schiffrin, A. Bisat (eds.), Columbia University Press, New York.
  13. Paniuszkin W., Zygar M. (2008), Gazprom. Rosyjska broń, Wydawnictwo W.A.B., Warszawa.
  14. Parra F.R. (2004), Oil Politics: A Modern History of Petroleum, I. B. Tauris, London.
  15. Pearson F. S., Rochester J. M. (1988), International Relations. The Global Condition in the Late Twentieth Century, Mc Graw - Hill Publishing Company, New York.
  16. Perloff J. M. (1998), Microeconomics, Addison Wesley Publishing Company, Reading Mass., New York and others.
  17. Pietraś M. (2002), Koncepcje i realia reżimów międzynarodowych, in: Stosunki Międzynarodowe, vol. XXV, nr 1-2.
  18. Potocki W. (2006), Gazprom- strategia totalna, CEO, September 2006, http://ceo.cxo.pl/artykuly/52810_1.html.
  19. Romm J.J. (1993), Defining National Security: The Nonmilitary Aspects, Council on Foreign Relations Press, New York.
  20. Stern R., Oil market Power and United States National Security, http://www.pnas.org/content/103/5/1650.full.
  21. Stiglitz J. E. (2004), Globalizacja, PWN, Warszawa.
  22. Tonnies F. (2008), Wspólnota i stowarzyszenie. Rozprawa o komunizmie i socjalizmie jako empirycznych formach kultury, PWN, Warszawa.
  23. The Economist (1-7.03.2008).
  24. US Trade Act (1974).
Cited by
Show
ISSN
1643-5877
Language
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2009.1.551
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu