BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Author
Lanfranchi Maurizio (University of Messina, Italy), Gianetto Carlo (University of Messina, Italy), Souca Maria Luiza (Babeş-Bolyai University)
Title
SERVQUAL - Measuring and Evaluating Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction
Servqual - pomiar i ocena jakości usług i zadowolenia klienta
Source
Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia, 2012, nr 50, s. 177-186, bibliogr. 25 poz.
Keyword
Jakość usług, Modele ekonomiczne, Teoria ekonomii
Quality of services, Economic models, Economic theory
Note
streszcz., summ..
Abstract
Wprowadzony w 1985 roku wraz z modelem luk, model SERVQUAL powstał w wyniku badań nad jakością usług, jakie przeprowadzili A. Parasuraman, V. Zeithaml i L. Berry. Model SERVQUAL stosowano w identyfikacji sposobów poprawy jakości usług i, pośrednio, zadowolenia klienta. Dalsze badania dowiodły jednak, że model nie jest bez wad, co przyczyniło się do jego wielokrotnych korekt i powstania konkurencyjnego, opartego na paradygmacie wydajności, modelu SERVPERF (Cronin i Taylor, 1992). Ponieważ żadnej z proponowanych poprawek do SERVQUAL, ani nowych modeli promowanych w praktyce i literaturze usługowej, można uznać za doskonałe rozwiązanie, celem niniejszego artykułu jest ocena krytyki związanej z SERVQUAL. Zbadano jak model był modyfikowany i stosowany i oceniono czy model SERVQUAL jest lepszy od innych proponowanych rozwiązań, zarówno w przeglądzie literatury i w praktyce, i jego wpływ na branżę usługową. (abstrakt oryginalny)

Introduced in 1985, together with the Gap Model, as a result of the research conducted on service quality by Parasuraman, Zeithaml and Berry, the SERVQUAL model has been used in identifying the ways in which service quality and, implicitly, customer satisfaction could be achieved and improved. However, as further research has proven, the model is not without flaws, a fact that has contributed to its several reassessments and the creation of a rival, based on the performance paradigm - the SERVPERF model (Cronin & Taylor, 1992). Since none of the proposed modifications for the SERVQUAL, nor the new models promoted by service literature and practice could be considered perfect solutions, the objective of this article is to evaluate the main criticism related to SERVQUAL, how the model has been modified and used, and to offer an opinion whether the SERVQUAL model is superior to the other proposed alternatives in both literature review and in practice with implications for the service industry. (original abstract)
Accessibility
The Library of Warsaw School of Economics
The Library of University of Economics in Katowice
The Main Library of Poznań University of Economics and Business
The Main Library of the Wroclaw University of Economics
Szczecin University Main Library
Full text
Show
Bibliography
Show
  1. Babakus E., Boller G. (1992), An empirical assessment of the SERVQUAL scale, "Journal of Business Research", Vol. 24: 253-268.
  2. Babakus E., Mangold W. (1992), Adapting the SERVQUAL scale to hospital services: an empirical investigation, Health Services Research, Vol. 26 (No. 2): 767-86.
  3. Boulding W., Kalra A., Staelin R., Zeithaml V.A. (1993). A dynamic process model of service quality: from expectations to behavioral intentions, "Journal of Marketing Research", Vol. 30 (No. 1): 7-27.
  4. Bouman M., van der Wiele T. (1992). Measuring service quality in the car service industry: building and testing an instrument, "International Journal of Service Industry Management", Vol. 3 (No. 4): 4-16.
  5. Brown S.W., Swartz T.A. (1989). A gap analysis of professional service quality, "Journal of Marketing", Vol. 53: 92-98.
  6. Burton S., Sheather S., Roberts J. (2003). Reality or Perception?: The Effect of Actual and Perceived Performance on Satisfaction and Behavioral Intention, "Journal of Service Research": 292- 302.
  7. Buttle F. (1996). SERVQUAL: review, critique, research agenda, "European Journal of Marketing", Vol. 30, No. 1: 8-32.
  8. Cronin J.J., Taylor S. (1994). SERVPERF versus SERVQUAL: reconciling performance-based and perceptions-minus expectations measurement of service quality. "Journal of Marketing", Vol. 58: 125-131.
  9. Gagliano K., Hathcote J. (1994). Customer expectations and perceptions of service quality in apparel retailing, "Journal of Services Marketing", Vol. 8 (No. 1): 60-69.
  10. Iacobucci D., Grayson K., Ostrom A. (1994). The calculus of service quality and customer satisfaction: theoretical and empirical differentiation and integration, [in:] T. Swartz, D. Bowen, S. Brown (Ed.), Advances in Services Marketing and Management, Vol. 3 (pp. 1-68). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  11. Knutson B., Stevens P., Wullaert C., Patton M., Yokoyama R. (1991). LODGSERV: a service quality index for the lodging industry, "Hospitality Research Journal", Vol. 15: 277-284.
  12. MacKay K.J., Crompton J.L. (1990). Measuring the quality of recreation services, "Journal of Park and Recreation Administration", Vol. 8 (No. 3): 47-56.
  13. Lanfranchi M., Giannetto C. (2009). Strategic guidelines of the cap for safety and valorisation of quality agri-food production. Sustainable tourism within high risk areas of environmental crisis, Messina, 2009
  14. Lanfranchi M, Giannetto C. (2011). The environmental balance sheet as a marketing strategy for the farm, in Quantitative methods for economic, agricultural-food and enviromental sciences.
  15. Lanfranchi M., Chirieleison R, Giannetto C. (2011). New communication techniques for agri-food enterprises in the age of the new economy, [in:] R. Borowiecki, A. Jaki: Global and regional challenges of the 21st century economy. Studies from economics and management.
  16. Lanfranchi M. (2009). The development of rural areas using the multifunctional farm model. Enterprise in The face of 21st century challenges Cracow University of Economics.
  17. Oliver R.L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions, "Journal of Marketing Research", Vol. 17 (November): 460-469.
  18. Parasuraman A. (2004). Assessing and improving service performance. Performance Measurement and Metrics, Vol. 5 (No. 2): 45-52.
  19. Parasuraman A., Zeithaml V.A., Malhotra A. (2005). E-S-QUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Assessing Electronic Service Quality, "Journal of Service Research: JSR", Vol. 7 (No. 3): 213- 233.
  20. Parasuraman A., Zeithaml V., Berry L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research, "Journal of Marketing", Vol. 49, Autumn: 41-50.
  21. Parasuraman A., Zeithaml V., Berry L. (1988). SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality, "Journal of Retailing", Vol. 64: 12-40.
  22. Parasuraman A., Zeithaml V., Berry L. (1994). Reassessment of expectations as a comparison standard in measuring service quality: implications for future research, "Journal of Marketing", Vol. 58 (January): 111-124.
  23. Reichheld F., Sasser W.E. (1990). Zero defections: quality comes to service, Harvard Business Review(September-October): 105-177.
  24. Ryan C., Cliff A. (1997). Do travel agencies measure up to customer expectations? An empirical investigation of travel agencies' service quality as measured by SERVQUAL, "Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing", Vol. 6 (No. 2): 1-31.
  25. Teas K.R., DeCarlo T.E. (2004), An Examination and Extension of the Zone-of-Tolerance Model: A Comparison to Performance-Based Model of Perceived Quality, "Journal of Service Research: JSR", Vol. 6 (No. 3): 272-286.
Cited by
Show
ISSN
1640-6818
1733-2842
Language
eng
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu