BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Author
Rozkrut Dominik (Uniwersytet Szczeciński)
Title
Do Westpomeranian firms differ from other in their innovation behavior?
Source
Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia, 2010, nr 26, s. 201-214, Rys., tab., bibliogr. poz. 14
Keyword
Innowacje, Przedsiębiorstwo
Innovations, Enterprises
Note
streszcz., summ..
Abstract
Innovation plays an important role in shaping the growth and competitiveness of firms. Therc- fore appropriatc indicators that can capture different aspects of innovation are crucial from the point of view of policy-making and policy evaluation. Classical indicators, based on results of innovation surveys, constructed using a single variables such as the "innovation rate", are of limited information capacity. Since innovation is a multidimensional process, application of explanatory data analysis may give additional insight into its naturę. In the paper factor analysis is used to derive different practices of innovation, and then the combinations of innovation practices applied by groups of in- novation firms are examined using a non-hierarchical clustering technique. The study reveals rather distinct differences in innovation practices observed on the regional level when compared with na- tional results. These are particularly elear when the tetrachoric corrclation is used as an input to the factor analysis. (original abstract)
Accessibility
The Library of Warsaw School of Economics
The Library of University of Economics in Katowice
The Main Library of Poznań University of Economics and Business
The Main Library of the Wroclaw University of Economics
Szczecin University Main Library
Bibliography
Show
  1. Arundel A. et al.: HowEuropes Economies Learn: A Comparison ofWork Organization and Innovation Mode for the EU-15. Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 16, Number 6, 2007.
  2. Cox H., Frenz M.: Innovation and Performance in Brilishbased Manufacturing Industries.S haping the Policy Agenda. The Business Economist, 33, 2002: 24-33
  3. De Jong J.P.J., Marsili O.: The Fruit Flies of Innovation: A Taxonomy of Innovative Smali Firms. Research Policy, Vol. 35, Issue 2, 2006.
  4. Frenz M., Lambert R.: Innovation modes andproductivity in the UK. Report to the Science, Innovation and Analysis Unit, DIUS 2008.
  5. Hollenstein H.: Innovation Modes in the Swiss Service Sector: A Cluster Analysis Basedon Firm level data. Research Policy, Vol. 32, Issue 5, 2003.
  6. Janas. W.: Procesy innowacyjne w przedsiębiorstwie, [in:] Podstawy nauki o organizacji, eds. S. Marek, M. Białasiewicz, PWE, Warszawa 2008, p. 271-300.
  7. Janasz W., Kozioł K.: Determinanty działalności innowacyjnej przedsiębiorstw, PWE, Warszawa 2007.
  8. Kelley M., Ilelper S.: Firm size and capabilities, regional agglomeration and the adoption of new technology, Economic Innovation and Technical Change, 1999, 8: 79-103.
  9. Pearson K.: Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. VII. On the correlation of characters not quantitatively measurable, Philos. Tr. R. Soc. S.-A, 195, 1900, 1-47.
  10. Pearson K., Heron D.: On theories ofassociation. Biometrika, 9, 1913, 159-315.
  11. OECD/Eurostat. Oslo Manuał - Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data. 3rei edition, OECD, Paris, 2005.
  12. Romijn H., Albu M.: Jnnovalion, networking and proximity: Lessons from smali high technology firms in the UK, Regional Studies, 36 (1), 2002: 81-86.
  13. Stevens J.: Appliedmultivariate slalisticsfor the socialsciences. Hillsdale 1986, NJ: Erlbaum.
  14. Świadek A.: Innovativeness of regional industrialSystems, Ekonomika i Organizacja Przedsiębiorstwa (Economics and Organization of Enterprise), 2009, No. 2 (709), p. 73-79.
Cited by
Show
ISSN
1640-6818
1733-2842
Language
eng
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu