BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Author
Wziątek-Kubiak Anna (Instytut Nauk Ekonomicznych PAN, Warszawa), Pęczkowski Marek (Uniwersytet Warszawski)
Title
Źródła i bariery ciągłości wdrażania innowacji przez polskie przedsiębiorstwa
Sources and Barriers of Persistence of Innovation of Polish Manufacturing Companies
Source
Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 2013, nr 305, s. 872-883, tab., bibliogr. 22 poz.
Research Papers of Wrocław University of Economics
Issue title
Ekonomia
Keyword
Innowacje, Innowacyjność
Innovations, Innovative character
Note
streszcz., summ.
Abstract
Opracowanie pokazuje przyczyny regularności i nieregularności aktywności innowacyjnej polskich firm przemysłowych. Wykorzystując mikrodane GUS dla dwóch okresów: 2004-2004 i 2004-2006, dzielimy firmy innowacyjne na dwie grupy: ustawicznych (regularnych) i nieregularnych innowatorów. Porównanie obu grup firm wskazuje na znaczącą lukę technologiczną między nimi. Odzwierciedla ona różnice w wyposażeniu w zasoby innowacyjne, w wykorzystaniu zewnętrznych zasobów innowacyjnych i informacji rynkowej oraz barierach innowacji, jakie napotykają. Ustawiczni innowatorzy napotykają bariery weryfikujące jakość handlową innowacji, podczas gdy nieregularni innowatorzy - bariery blokujące działalność innowacyjną(abstrakt oryginalny)

This paper analyses persistence of innovation activities of Polish manufacturing firms in an unconventional way. Based on micro data over 2002-2004 and 2004-2006, it puts innovating firms into two categories: persistent innovators, which innovate continuously, and occasional innovators, which innovate irregularly. Next, a comparison between the two groups is made. The paper shows that there is a considerable technological gap between the two groups of firms. It reflects the difference in the innovation resources endowment, the intensity of the use of innovation networks and market information on innovation, and the types of barriers they face. Persistent innovators face revealed barriers of innovation, which shows some weaknesses of their innovation process. Occasional innovators are facing deterred barriers which prevent them from innovating.(original abstract)
Accessibility
The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics
The Library of Warsaw School of Economics
The Library of University of Economics in Katowice
The Main Library of Poznań University of Economics and Business
The Main Library of the Wroclaw University of Economics
Bibliography
Show
  1. Arundel A., Hollanders H. (2005), EXIS: An Exploratory Approach to Innovation Scoreboards, Brussels: European Commission, DG Enterprise.
  2. Arundel A., Lorenz E., Lundvall B., Valeyre A. (2007), How Europe's economies learn: a comparison of work organization and innovation mode for the EU-15, "Industrial and Corporate Change", vol. 16, nr 6, s. 1175-1210.
  3. Avlonitis G.J., Salavou H.E. (2007), Entrepreneurial orientation of SMEs, product innovativeness, and performance, "Journal of Business Research" nr 60, s. 566-575.
  4. BodasFreitas I.M., Clausen T., Fontana R., Verspagen B. (2008), Formal and informal external link- ages and firms' innovation strategies: a cross-country comparison, TIK working paper on innovation studies nr 20081113.
  5. Cassiman B., Veugelers R. (2002), Complementarity in the Innovation Strategy: Complementarity in the Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D, External Technology Acquisition, and Cooperation in R&D, http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=303562.
  6. Dosi G. (1988), Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation, "Journal of Economic Literature", 26(3), s. 1120-1171.
  7. Fabrizio K.R. (2009), Absorptive capacity and the search for innovation, "Research Policy" nr 38, s. 255-267.
  8. Flaig G., Stadler M. (1994), Success breeds success: the dynamics of the innovation process, "Empirical Economics", nr 19, s. 55-68.
  9. Hollenstein H. (2003), Innovation modes in the Swiss service sector: a cluster analysis based on firm-level data, "Research Policy", vol. 32, s. 845-863.
  10. Hölzl W., Janger J. (2012), Innovation Barriers across Firms and Countries Werner, WIFO Working Papers, nr 426.
  11. Jensen M.B., Johnson R, Lorenz E., Lundvall B.A. (2007), Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation, "Research Policy" nr 36, s. 680-693.
  12. Mazzanti M., Mancinelli S. (2007), SME Performance, Innovation and Networking Evidence on Complementarities for a Local Economic System, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Working papers, nr 79.
  13. Mowery D.C., Sampat B.N. (2004), Universities in national innovation systems, [w:] J. Fagerberg, D.C. Mowery, R.R. Nelson (red.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  14. Nelson R.R., Winter S.G. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Harvard University Press, MA.
  15. OECD (2005), Oslo Manual, http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/35/61/2367580.pdf.
  16. PetersB. (2009), Persistence of innovation: stylized facts and panel data evidence, "Journal of Technology Transfer", nr 34(2), s. 226-243.
  17. Raymond W., Mohnen P., Palm F., Van Der Loeff S.S. (2006), Persistence of Innovation in Dutch Manufacturing: Is it Spurious?, CESifo Working Paper nr 1681.
  18. Srholec M., Verspagen B. (2008), The Voyage of the Beagle in Innovation System Land. Explorations on Sectors, Innovation, Heterogeneity and Selection, UN University, UNU-Merit, WP series 2008-008.
  19. Tiri M., Peeters L., Swinnen G. (2006), Are innovation patterns in manufacturing and services converging? A multivariate analysis of CIS-3 data for the flemish business, DRIUT Summer Conference 2006, Copenhagen, Denmark, http://hdl.handle.net/1942/1382.
  20. Verspagen B. (2000), Economic Growth and Technological Change: An Evolutionary Interpretation, MERIT, Maastricht, Working Paper nr 17.
  21. Veugelers R., Cassima B. (1999), Make and buy in innovation strategies: evidence from Belgian manufacturing firms, "Research Policy" nr 28, s. 63-80.
  22. Wziątek-Kubiak A., Balcerowicz E., Pęczkowski M. (2009), Differentiation of innovation behavior of manufacturing firms in the New Member States. Cluster analysis on firm-level data, WIIW Working Paper 8/09.
Cited by
Show
ISSN
1899-3192
Language
pol
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu