BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Charouz Jaroslav, Ramík Jaroslav
Application of an AHP-type Method at Portfolio Management
Multiple Criteria Decision Making / University of Economics in Katowice, 2010, vol. 5, s. 47-62, tab., bibliogr. 13 poz.
Analityczny proces hierarchiczny, Podejmowanie decyzji finansowych, Podejmowanie decyzji, Metody ekonometryczne, Wielokryterialne podejmowanie decyzji
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Decision making of finance, Decision making, Econometric methodology, Multiple-criteria decision making
summ., Korespondencja z redakcją: numeracja wpisana za zgodą redakcji (wynika z ciągłości wydawniczej serii MCDM) - brak numeracji na stronie tytułowej
The article deals with an application of the methodology of Analytic Hierarchy process (AHP) and also with its newly developed modification named FVK to portfolio management. The method AHP was published already in 1980s whereas FVK is a newly created tool expanding application possibilities of the AHP. Both methods are based on the definitions of decision criteria and variants in a logical hierarchy. First, we decompose the decision problem analytically from the upper to the lowest level and then we perform a synthesis by evaluating the decision variants and eliciting the best one. Here, we apply this multi-criteria methodology to the problem of a port- folio manager making a decision when selecting the best possible instrument on the financial market. Using a case study we demonstrate how appropriate application of the above mentioned methods could show a clear way for finding a satisfactory solution of this problem.(original abstract)
The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics
The Library of Warsaw School of Economics
The Library of University of Economics in Katowice
The Main Library of Poznań University of Economics and Business
The Main Library of the Wroclaw University of Economics
Full text
  1. Becker W.: Review for the CFA EXAM, Level 1 Asset Valuation Portfolio Management. One Tower Lane, Suite 370, Oak Brook Terrace IL 60181, Canada 2002.
  2. Fiala P., Jablonsky J., Mañas M.: Vicekriteriálni rozhodováni. VSE Praha 1997.
  3. RamíkJ., PerzinaR.: Moderni metody hodnoceni a rozhodováni. Studia Oeconomica. Slezská univerzita v Opavë, OPF v Karviné 2008.
  4. RamíkJ., PerzinaR.: A Method for Solving Fuzzy MCDM Problems with Dependent Criteria. In: Proceedings of the Joint 4-th International Conference on Soft Computing and Intelligent Systems and 9-th International Symposium on advanced Intelligent Systems. Nagoya University 2008, pp. 1323-1328.
  5. Saaty T.L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York 1980.
  6. Saaty T.L.: Multicriteria Decision Making - the Analytic Hierarchy Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh 1991.
  7. Subrt T., Semerádová A.: Interaktivnipfistupy k feseni vicekriteriálnich problémù Vprojektovém Hzeni. "E+M Economics and Management" 2007, roc. 10, c. 2, pp. 51-57.
  8. Varga M.: Forecasting Commodity prices with Exponential Smoothing. "E+M Economics and Management" 2008, roc. 11, c. 3, pp. 94-97.
  9. Zmeskal Z.: a kol. Financni modely. Ekopress, Ostrava 2004
  10. [lOJKhaksari S, KamathR., Grieves R.: A New Approach to determining Optimum Portfolio Mix. "The Joumal of Portfolio Management" 1989. DOI: 10.3905/jpm. 1989.409201.
  11. Carmone J.F., Kara A., ZanakisH.S.: A Monte Carlo Investigation of Incomplete Pairwise Comparison in AHP. "European Joumal of Operational Research" 1997, Vol. 102, No. 3, pp. 538-553. DOI:10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00250-0.
  12. Bolster P., Warrick S.: Matching Investors with Suitable, Optimal and Investable Portfolios. "The Joumal of Wealth Management" 2008, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 53-63. DOI: 10.3905/jwm.2008.701851.
  13. EC-Expert Choice - Collaboration and Decision-Support Software v. 11.5,
Cited by
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu