BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Author
Meihami Hussein (Islamic Azad University, Ghorveh, Iran)
Title
Text-To-Speech Software : a New Perspective in Learning and Teaching Word Stress, Word Intonation, Pitch Contour, and Fluency of English Reading
Source
International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (ILSHS), 2013, vol. 8, s. 24-33, rys., tab., bibliogr. 23 poz.
Keyword
Język angielski, Nauczanie języków obcych, Komputerowe wspomaganie dydaktyki, Przegląd literatury, Wyniki badań
English language, Foreign language teaching, Information technology in teaching, Literature review, Research results
Note
summ.
Abstract
When mentioning technology in the language classroom, the first impulse is to think computer technology, almost because computers have so pervade our daily home, workplace, and society contexts. The aim of this experimental research is to investigate the effect of using Text-To-Speech Software (TTS), one of Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) resources in teaching reading, in different aspects of reading fluency. In this study, we investigated teaching and learning of Word Stress, Word intonation, Pitch Contour, and Fluency of English reading through TTS. It should be stated that comprehension had been worked in the program but wasn't investigated in the study. The study indicated that word stress; word intonation, pitch contour, and fluency had significantly improved by using TTS software. (original abstract)
Full text
Show
Bibliography
Show
  1. Auralog, (2002). Talk to me: the conversation method (French). (Version 3.5) from Auralog, http://www.auralog.fr.
  2. Beutnagel, M., Conkie, A., Schroeter, J., Stylianou, Y., Syrdal, A., (1999). The AT&T next-gen TTS system. In: Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of the ASA, EAA, and DAGA. Berlin, Germany.
  3. Black, A., Lenzo, K., (2000). Limited domain synthesis. In: Proceedings of the ICSLP, Beijing, China.
  4. Campbell, N., Black, A., (1997). Prosody and the selection of source units for concatenative synthesis. In: van Santen, J., Sproat, R., Olive, J., Hirschberg, J. (Eds.), Progress in Speech Synthesis. Springer-Verlag, London, pp. 279-292.
  5. Campbell, N., Hamza, W., Hoge, H., Tao, J., Bailly, G., (2006). Special section on expressive speech synthesis. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing 14(4).
  6. Chapelle, C., (2001a). Innovative language learning: achieving the vision. ReCALL 23(10), 3-14.
  7. Conkie, A. (1999). Robust Unit Selection System for Speech Synthesis. In Procs. Joint meeting of ASA, EAA, and DAGA. Berlin. Germany.
  8. de Pijper, J., (1997). High-quality message-to-speech generation in a practical application. In: van Santen, J., Sproat, R., Olive, J., Hirschberg, J. (Eds.), Progress in Speech Synthesis. Springer Verlag, London, pp. 575-588.
  9. Ehsani, B.K., Knodt, E., (1998). Speech technology in computer-aided language learning: strengths and limitations of a new CALL paradigm. Language Learning & Technology 2 (1), 45-60, Retrieved January 31, 2005, from, http://llt.msu.edu/vol2num1/article3/.
  10. Francis, A., Nusbaum, H., (1999). Evaluating the quality of synthetic speech. In: Gardner-Bonneau, D. (Ed.), Human Factors and Voice Interactive Systems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp. 63-67.
  11. Handley, Z., (2006). Evaluating Text-To-Speech (TTS) Synthesis for use in Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL). Unpublished Doc-toral Thesis. The University of Manchester.
  12. Henton, C., (2002). Challenges and rewards in using parametric or concatenative speech synthesis. International Journal of Speech Technology 5, 117-131.
  13. Huang, X., Acero, X., Hon, H.-W., (2001). Spoken Language Processing: A Guide to Theory, Algorithm, and System Development. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
  14. Keller, E., Zellner-Keller, B., (2000). Speech synthesis in language learning: challenges and opportunities. Procs. InSTIL. University of Abertay Dundee, Dundee, England, pp. 109-116.
  15. Multitel, (2005). eLite Documentation. Retrieved from, http://www.multitel.be/TTS/layout.php?page=eLite_doc.
  16. Polkosky, M., Lewis, J., (2003). Expanding the MOS: development and psychometric evaluation of the MOS-R and MOS-X. International Journal of Speech Technology 6, 161-182.
  17. Raux, A., Eskenazi, M., (2004). Using task-oriented spoken dialogues for language learning: Potential, practical application and challenges. In: Delmonte, R., Delcloque, P., Tonelli, S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the InSTIL/ICALL 2004 Symposium, Venice, Italy, pp. 147-150.
  18. Santiago-Oriola, C., (1999). Vocal synthesis in a computerized dictation exercise. In: Proceedings of EUROSPEECH'99, Vol. 1, Budapest, pp. 191-194.
  19. Schroeter, J., Conkie, A., Syrdal, A., Beutnagel, M., Juka, M., Strom, V., Kim, M.-J., Kang, H.-G., Kapllow, D., (2002). A perspective on the next challenges for TTS research. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 2002 Workshop on Speech Synthesis, Santa Monica, California, pp. 211-214.
  20. Seneff, S., Wang, C., Zhang, J., (2004). Spoken conversational interaction for language learning. In: Proceedings of the InSTIL/ICALL 2004 - NLP and Speech Technologies in Language Learning Systems, Venice, Italy, pp. 151-154.
  21. Sparck Jones, K., Galliers, J. R., (1996). Evaluating Natural Language Processing Systems: An Analysis and Review. Springer, London.
  22. Stratil, M., Weston, G., Burkhardt, D., (1987b). Exploration of foreign language speech synthesis. Literary and Linguistic Computing 2 (2), 116-119.
  23. TMA Associates, 2003. Nuance: US English. Retrieved from, http://www.tmaa.com/tts/Nuance_USEng.htm.
Cited by
Show
ISSN
2300-2697
Language
eng
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu