BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Author
Yalçin Cem (Dokuz Eylul University)
Title
Challenging the future: the democratic deficit of the EU from a federalist perspective
Source
The Poznań University of Economics Review, 2014, vol. 14, nr 3, s. 23-38, bibliogr. 43 poz.
Keyword
Demokracja, Federalizm, Patriotyzm
Democracy, Federalism, Patriotism
Note
summ.
Company
Unia Europejska (UE)
European Union (EU)
Abstract
Over the decades the European Union (EU) has evolved into a "quasi-state" of roughly 500 million citizens with 28 members. This process has also brought about the so-called 'democratic deficit' arguments arising from the (un)democratic characteristics of the EU institutions (institutional dimension) and lack of a European demos (socio-psychological dimension). Political systems need peoples' recognition, acceptance and understanding of the system and the rulers in order to preserve their existence. Hence, as a political system, as long as the EU does not make necessary reforms in terms of democracy, democratic deficit will be a challenge to the future of the EU. In this context the paper will aim to present answers to both institutional and socio-psychological dimensions of democratic deficit from a federalist perspective. (original abstract)
Accessibility
The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics
The Library of Warsaw School of Economics
The Library of University of Economics in Katowice
The Main Library of Poznań University of Economics and Business
The Main Library of the Wroclaw University of Economics
Full text
Show
Bibliography
Show
  1. Alvarez, M. et al., 1996, Classifying Political Regimes, Studies in Comparative International Development, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 3-36.
  2. Arblaster, A., 1987, Democracy, Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
  3. Bonde, J., 2011, The European Unions Democratic Deficit: How to Fix It, The Brown Journal of World Affairs, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 147-162.
  4. Börzel, T.A., Hosli, M.O., 2003, Brussels between Bern and Berlin: Comparative Federalism Meets the European Union, Governance, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 179-202.
  5. Bowman, J., 2006, The European Union Democratic Deficits: Federalists, Skeptics, and Revisionists, European Journal of Political Theory, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 191-212.
  6. Burgess, M., 2000, Federalism and European Union: The Building of Europe 1950-2000, Routledge, London.
  7. Burgess, M., 2009, Federalism, in: Diez, X, Wiener, A. (eds.), European Integration Theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 25-44.
  8. Burgess, M., Gagnon, A., 2010, Federalism andDemocracy, in: Burgess, M., Gagnon, A. (eds.), Federal Democracies, Routledge, London, pp. 1-26.
  9. Catt, H., 1999, Democracy in Practice, Routledge, London.
  10. Chryssochoou, D.N., 1998, Federalism and Democracy Reconsidered, Regional & Federal Studies, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1-20.
  11. Chryssochoou, D.N., 2009, Europe's Contested Democracy, in: Cini, M. (ed.), European Union Politics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 377-389.
  12. Chryssochoou, D.N., Stavridis, S., Tsinisizelis M.J, 1998, European Democracy, Parliamentary Decline and the 'Democratic Deficit' of the European Union, The Journal of Legislative Studies, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 109-129.
  13. Cordina, G, 2003, Legitimacy: A Growing Necessity for the Future of Europe, Bank of Valletta Review, no. 28, pp. 50-75.
  14. Dahl, R.A., 1971, Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition, Yale University Press, New Haven.
  15. Decker, F., 2002, Governance beyond the Nation-State, Reflections on the Democratic Deficit of the European Union, Journal of European Public Pobcy, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 256-272.
  16. Diedrichs, U, Wolfgang, W, 1997, A New Kind of Legitimacy for a New Kind of Parliament: The Evolution of the European Parliament, European Integration Online Papers, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 1-16.
  17. Eriksen, E.O., 2001, Governance or Democracy? The White Paper on European Governance, in: Jean Monnet Working Paper, Symposium: Mountain or Molehill? A Critical Appraisal of the Commission White Paper on Governance, Joerges, G, Meny, Y, Weiler, J.H.H. (eds.), no. 6, pp. 1-19.
  18. Follesdal, A., 1998, Democracy, Legitimacy and Majority Rule in the European Union, in: Weale, A., Netwich, M. (eds.), Political Theory and the European Union: Legitimacy, Constitutional Choice and Citizenship, Routledge, London.
  19. Follesdal, A., Hix, S., 2006, Why There is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik, Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 533-562.
  20. Ghobadi, S., Valadbigi, A., 2011, Federalism and Perspectives of Democracy, OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 37-44.
  21. Habermas, J., 1994, Citizenship and National Identity, in: v. Staanbergen, B. (ed.), The Condition of Citizenship, Sage Pubbcations, London, pp. 20-35.
  22. Habermas, J., 2000, Crossing Globalization's Valley of Tears, New Perspectives Quarterly, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 51-57.
  23. Habermas, J., 2001, Why Europe Needs a Constitution, New Left Review, no. 11, pp. 5-26.
  24. Horeth, M., 1999, No Way out for the Beast? The Unsolved Legitimacy Problem of European Governance, Journal of European Public Pobcy, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 249-268.
  25. Inanç, H., Ozler, H., 2007, Democratic Deficit in the EU: Is There an Institutional Solution to Over-Institutionalization?, Turkish Journal of International Relations, vol. 6, no. 1-2, pp. 114-138.
  26. Joby, M., 2005, A Demos for the European Union?, Pobtics, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 12-18.
  27. Joby, M., 2007, The European Union and the People, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  28. Karl,T.L., Schmitter, P.C., 1991, What Democracy Is... and Isnot, Journal of Democracy, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 75-88.
  29. Katz, R.S., 2001, Models of Democracy: Elite Attitudes and the Democratic Deficit in the European Union, European Union Pobtics, vol. 2, no. 53, pp. 53-79.
  30. Kim, N., Jung, S., 2010, Democratic Deficit, European Constitution, and a Vision of die Federal Europe: The EU's Path after the Lisbon Treaty, Journal of International and Area Studies, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 53-70.
  31. Kincaid, J., 2010, Federalism and Democracy: Comparative Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives, in: Burgess, M., Gagnon, A. (eds.), Federal Democracies, Routledge, London, pp. 299-324.
  32. Kumm, M., 2005, The Idea of Thick Constitutional Patriotism and Its Implications for die Role and Structure of European Legal History, German Law Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 319-354.
  33. Lacroix, J., 2002, For a European Constitutional Patriotism, Political Studies, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 944-958.
  34. Lord, C., 1998, Democracy in the European Union, Sheffield Academic Press, Sheffield.
  35. Lord, C., 2001, Democracy and Democratization in the European Union, in: Bromley, S. (ed.), Governing the European Union, Sage Publications, London, pp. 165-190.
  36. Lord, C., 2008, Does the EU Suffer from a Democratic Deficit?, Intereconomics, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 316-320.
  37. Majone, G., 1998, Europe's Democratic Deficit: The Question of Standards, European Law Journal, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 5-28.
  38. Marquand, D., 1979, Parliament for Europe, Jonathan Cape, London.
  39. Moravcsik, A., 2002, In Defence of the 'Democratic Deficit': Reassessing Legitimacy in the European Union, Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 603-624.
  40. Przeworski, A., 1991, Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  41. Tbomassen, L., 2010, Habermas: A Guide for the Perplexed, Continuum, London.
  42. Watts, R.L., 2010, Comparative Reflections on Federalism and Democracy, in: Burgess, M., Gagnon, A. (eds.), Federal Democracies, Routledge, London, pp. 325-346.
  43. Zweifel, T.D., 2002,... Who is without the Sin Cast the First Stone: The EU's Democratic Deficit in Comparison, Journal of European Pubbc Policy, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 812-840.
Cited by
Show
ISSN
1643-5877
Language
eng
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu