BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Author
Daniłowska Alina (Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW, Poland), Ismayilov Altay (Qafqaz University in Baku), Aliyev Khatai (Qafqaz University in Baku)
Title
The Comparative Analysis of Agricultural Financial Systems in Poland and Azerbaijan
Systemy finansowania rolnictwa w Polsce i Azerbejdżanie - ujęcie porównawcze
Source
Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Oeconomia, 2014, R. 13, nr 3, s. 41-53, rys., tab., bibliogr. 16 poz.
Keyword
Pośrednictwo finansowe, Analiza porównawcza, Rolnictwo, System finansowy
Financial intermediation, Comparative analysis, Agriculture, Financial system
Note
streszcz., summ.
Country
Azerbejdżan, Polska
Azerbaijan, Poland
Abstract
W opracowaniu dokonano porównania systemów finansowania rolnictwa w Polsce i Azerbejdżanie. Polska jako członek UE ma rozwinięty system finansowania, który podlega regulacjom w ramach WPR i tak zwanej pomocy krajowej. System w Polsce składa się z pośredników finansowych (banki) państwowych agencji (ARiMR ARR), instrumentów (kredyt i subsydia) oraz regulacji. Dla porównania w Azerbejdżanie system wsparcia rolnictwa jest oparty na subsydiach z agencji państwowych. Udział kredytów rolniczych w portofolio banków i niebankowych instytucji kredytowych jest bardzo mały. Państwowe agencje w Azerbejdżanie stosują kredyt preferencyjny, pośrednie i bezpośrednie subsydia oraz wsparcie technologiczne. Jednak system wsparcia jest mało efektywny. Wykorzystanie polskich dobrych doświadczeń może pomóc zwiększyć efektywność systemu. (abstrakt oryginalny)

This paper makes a comparative analysis of agricultural financial systems in Poland and Azerbaijan. Poland as a member the of EU has developed its system under Common Agricultural Policy of the EU and so-called domestic support. The system is consisted of financial intermediaries, state agencies (ARMA, AMA), instruments (preferential credits, and subsidies) and regulations. In comparison, Azerbaijan's agricultural financial system is mainly based on support by state agencies. Thus, share of agriculture credits in portfolio of banks and non-bank credit organizations is very small. Azerbaijan state agencies use instruments such as preferential credits, direct and indirect subsidies, and technological support. However, there are serious challenges which make agricultural financial system and the support less effective. It is concluded that Azerbaijan should benefit from good experiences of Poland in order to make the system more effective. (original abstract)
Accessibility
The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics
The Library of Warsaw School of Economics
The Library of University of Economics in Katowice
The Main Library of Poznań University of Economics and Business
The Main Library of the Wroclaw University of Economics
Full text
Show
Bibliography
Show
  1. ANSEF, http://anfes.gov.az/en/pages/e250c4ac-d0eb-102d-90d7-0bda273183fc/ ABOUT%20FUND.html
  2. Banski J., 2011. Changes in Agricultural Land Ownership in Poland in the Period of the Market Economy. Journal of Agricultural Economics 57(2), 93-101.
  3. Central Statistical Office. Bilansowe wyniki finansowe banków w 1999, 2001, 2003, Warsaw Central Statistical Office. Monitoring of Banks 2005-2010, 2012. Warsaw.
  4. Central Statistical Office, Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of Poland 2013. Warsaw, 2013.
  5. Central Statistical Office, Statistical Yearbook of Agriculture 2005, 2013. Warsaw 2005, 2013.
  6. Chrastinova Z., 1999. Financing of the Agricultural Sector of the Slovak Republic and Credit Infrastructure. [in:] Agricultural Finance and Credit Infrastructure in Transition Economies. OECD Proceedings, 358-364.
  7. Dudwick N., Fock K., Sedik D., 2007. Land Reform and Farm Restructuring in Transition Countries: The Experience of Bulgaria, Moldova, Azerbaijan, and Kazakhstan. World Bank Publications.
  8. Koester U., 2001. Agricultural Finance and Institutional Reforms in Transition Economies: The 1990s and Challenges Ahead. Proceedings of OECD Expert Meeting, Portoroz, Slovenia. OECD, 53-68.
  9. Ministry of Agriculture, http://www.agro.gov.az/index.php?cat=18&ses=59fed
  10. National Bank of Azerbaijan (NBA). General Information about Financial Organizations in Azerbaijan, http://nba.az/assets/2337/Maliyye_teshkilatlari_haqqinda_umumi_melumat.pdf
  11. Silar J., Doucha T., 1999. Credit Support Schemes Provided by the Support and the Guarantee Fund for Farmers and Forestry in the Czech Republic. [in:] Agricultural Finance and Credit Infrastructure in Transition Economies. OECD Proceedings, 263-276.
  12. Spoor M., Visser O., 2001. The State of Agrarian Reform in the Former Soviet Union. Journal of Europe-Asia Studies 53(6), 885-901.
  13. Thomas J., 2006. Property Rights, Land Fragmentation and the Emerging Structure of Agriculture in Central and Eastern European Countries. Journal of Agricultural and Development Economics 3(2), 225-275.
  14. Ulrich A., 1999. The Activities of the Rural Credit Guarantee Foundation in Hungary. [in:] Agricultural Finance and Credit Infrastructure in Transition Economies, OECD Proceedings.
  15. World Bank, 2005. Realizing Azerbaijan's Comparative Advantages in Agriculture. Final Report.
  16. World Bank, http://siteresources.worldbank.org/AZERBAIJANEXTN/Resources/AZ_Ag_Mktg_ Study_Final_Report.pdf
Cited by
Show
ISSN
1644-0757
Language
eng
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu