- Author
- Gołębiowski Tomasz (Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie)
- Title
- Wpływ zakorzenienia przedsiębiorstwa na przewagę konkurencyjną - perspektywa korporacji transnarodowej
Influence of Firm's Embeddedness on Competitive Advantage - a Transnational Corporation Perspective - Source
- International Business and Global Economy, 2014, nr 33, s. 495-505, bibliogr. 44 poz.
Biznes Międzynarodowy w Gospodarce Globalnej - Issue title
- European Union - 10 Years after Enlargement
- Keyword
- Przewaga konkurencyjna, Korporacje międzynarodowe
Competitive advantage, International corporation - Note
- summ., streszcz.
- Abstract
- Artykuł poświęcono analizie koncepcji zakorzenienia (embeddedness) i jego wpływu na przewagę konkurencyjną przedsiębiorstwa w świetle teorii zasobowej, teorii sieci oraz teorii biznesu międzynarodowego. Zakorzenienie przedsiębiorstwa jest określone przez zakres funkcjonalny jego relacji z podmiotami otoczenia i liczbę tych partnerów, intensywność i trwałość więzi oraz współzależność partnerów. Właściwy poziom zakorzenienia ma istotny wpływ na powiększanie i wykorzystywanie zasobów wiedzy przedsiębiorstwa. Z tego względu jest ono uznawane za ważną determinantę trwałej przewagi konkurencyjnej przedsiębiorstw na rynku międzynarodowym. W artykule omówiono specyfikę zarządzania relacjami,w tym także kwestie odnoszące się do poziomu i charakteru zakorzenienia, w korporacjach transnarodowych (KTN). Uwzględniono przy tym zarówno zakorzenienie wewnętrzne, tj. w relacjach między podmiotami tworzącymi wewnętrzną sieć KTN, jak i zakorzenienie zewnętrzne, tj. w relacjach centrali korporacji, a zwłaszcza filii zagranicznych z niezależnymi podmiotami w kraju goszczącym. (abstrakt oryginalny)
The paper is aimed at the analysis of the concept of firm's embeddedness and its influence on firm's competitive advantage in the context of resource-based view of a firm, business networks theory, and international business theories. Embeddedness is characterized by the number of functional areas of the firm involved with external partners and the number of these partners, intensity and sustainability of linkages, and interdependence of relationships' actors. The right level of embedding is crucial for augmenting and exploitation of the knowledge available to the firm. Therefore, embeddedness has been recognized as a significant determinant of firm's sustainable competitive advantage in international markets. The paper discusses the specific issues related to relationship management, incl. those connected with the level and nature of embeddedness in transnational corporations (TNC). Analysis covers both the internal embeddedness, i.e. in linkages within the internal TNC network, and the external embeddedness, i.e. in relationships of headquarters or foreign subsidiaries with independent actors in a host country. (original abstract) - Full text
- Show
- Bibliography
- Ambos T. C., Ambos B., Schlegelmilch B. B., 2006, Learning from foreign subsidiaries. An empirical investigation of headquarters' benefit from reverse knowledge transfers, International Business Review, vol. 15, issue 2.
- Andersson U., Forsgren M., Holm U., 2001, Subsidiary embeddedness and competence development in MNCs. A multi-level analysis, Organization Studies, vol. 22, issue 6.
- Andersson U., Forsgren M., Holm U., 2007, Balancing subsidiary influence in the federative MNC - a business network perspective, Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 38, issue 5.
- Birkinshaw J., Hood N., 1998, Multinational subsidiary evolution. Capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies, Academy of Management Review, vol. 23, issue 4.
- Bleeke J., Ernst D. (eds.), 1993, Collaborating to compete, J. Wiley, New York.
- Buckley P. J., Carter M., 2004, A formal analysis of knowledge combination in multinational enterprises, Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 35, issue 5.
- Buckley P. J., Hashai N., 2009, Formalizing internationalization in the eclectic paradigm, Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 40, issue 1.
- Ciabuschi, F., Forsgren M., Martin Martin O., 2012, Headquarters involvement and efficiency of innovation development and transfer in multinationals. A matter of sheer ignorance?, International Business Review, vol. 21, issue 2.
- Ciabuschi F., Martin Martin O., 2011, Effects of subsidiary autonomy on innovation development and transfer intensities, [w:] A. Verbeke, A. T. Tavares-Lehmann, R. Van Tulder, Entrepreneurship in the Global Firm, Emerald Publishing Group, Bingley.
- Danik L., Gołębiowski T., 2013, Przepływy wiedzy w korporacjach transnarodowych - perspektywa filii zagranicznej, [w:] Przedsiębiorstwo na rynku globalnym, red. J. Schroeder, R. Śliwiński, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu, Poznań.
- Doz Y., Santos J., Williamson P., 2001, From Global to Metanational. How Companies Win in the Knowledge Economy, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
- Dunning J. H., Lundan S. M., 2008, Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy, 2nd ed., Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
- Dyer J. H., Singh H., 1998, The relational view. Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganisational competitive advantage, Academy of Management Review, vol. 23, issue 4.
- Forsgren M., Holm U., Johanson J., 2005, Managing the Embedded Multinational. A Business Network View, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
- Foss N. J., Knudsen Ch. (eds.), 1996, Towards a Competence Theory of a Firm, Routledge, London.
- Frost T. S., Birkinshaw J. M., Ensign P. C., 2002, Centers of excellence in multinational corporations, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 23, issue 11.
- Gammelgaard J., McDonald F., Stephan A., Tüselmann H., Dörrenbächer Ch., 2012, The impact of increases in subsidiary autonomy and network relationships on performance, International Business Review, vol. 21, issue 6.
- Ghoshal S., Bartlett Ch. A., 1990, The multinational corporation as an interorganizational network, Academy of Management Review, vol. 15, issue 4.
- Gołębiowski T., 2013, Positioning of foreign subsidiaries in multinational enterprise network. Does the local embeddedness matter?, Journal of Economics and Management, vol. 14 (University of Economics in Katowice).
- Granovetter M., 1985, Economic action and social structure. The problem of embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 91.
- Gupta A., Govindarajan V., 2000, Knowledge flow within multinational corporations, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 21, issue 4.
- Hakansson H., Snehota I. (eds.), 1995, Developing relationships in business networks, Routledge, London.
- Halinen A., Törnroos J.-A., 1998, The role of embeddedness in the evolution of business networks, Scandinavian Journal of Management, vol. 14, issue 3.
- Harzing A.-W., Noorderhaven N., 2006, Knowledge flows in MNCs. An empirical test and extension of Gupta/Govindarajan's typology of subsidiary roles, International Business Review, vol. 15, issue 3.
- Holm U., Pedersen T. (eds.), 2000, The Emergence and Impact of MNC Centers of Excellence. A Subsidiary Perspective, Macmillan, Basingstoke.
- Johanson J., Mattson L. G., 1988, Internationalisation in industrial systems - a network approach, [w:] Strategies in Global Competition, ed. N. Hood, J. E. Vahlne, Crom Helm, London.
- Kumar A. J., Ganesh L. S., 2009, Research on knowledge transfer in organizations. A morphology, Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 13, no. 4.
- Lechner C., Dowling M., 2003, Firm networks. External relationships as sources for the growth and competitiveness of entrepreneurial firms, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, vol. 15, issue 1.
- Meyer K. E., Mudambi R., Narula R., 2011, Multinational enterprises and local contexts. The opportunities and challenges of multiple embeddedness, Journal of Management Studies, vol. 48, issue 2.
- Monteiro F. L., Arvidsson N., Birkinshaw J., 2008, Knowledge flows within MNC. Explaining subsidiary isolation and its performance implication, Organization Science, vol. 19, issue 1.
- Mu S. C., Gnyawali D. R., Hatfield D. E., 2007, Foreign subsidiaries' learning from local environments. An empirical test, Management International Review, vol. 47, issue 1.
- Narula R., 2013, Exploring the paradox of competence-creating subsidiaries. Balancing bandwidth and dispersion in MNEs, UNU-MERIT Working Paper Series no. 2013-046.
- Nelson R., Winter S., 1982, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
- Peng M. W., 2001, The resource-based view and international business, Journal of Management, vol. 27, issue 6.
- Peng M. W., 2009, Global Strategic Management, 2nd ed., South-Western, Cengage Learning.
- Phene A., Almeida P., 2008, Innovation in multinational subsidiaries. The role of knowledge assimilation and subsidiary capabilities, Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 39, issue 5.
- Rugman A. M., Verbeke A., 2001, Subsidiary-specific advantages in multinational enterprises, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 22, issue 3.
- Schmid S., Hartmann S., 2011, Product innovation processes in foreign subsidiaries. The influence of local embeddedness, 37th EIBA Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania.
- Tallman S., Phene A., 2007, Leveraging knowledge across geographic boundaries, Organization Science, vol. 18, issue 2.
- Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A., 1997, Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18, issue 7.
- Thorelli H. B., 1986, Networks. Between markets and hierarchies, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 7, issue 1.
- Wit B. de, Meyer R., 2007, Synteza strategii, Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, Warszawa.
- Vahlne J. E., Johanson J., 2013, The Uppsala model on evolution of the multinational business enterprise - from internalization to coordination of networks, International Marketing Review, vol. 30, issue 3.
- Zorska A., 2013, Knowledge development and transfer in foreign subsidiaries and their parent transnational corporations, International Journal of Management and Economics, no. 40 (dawniej: Zeszyty Naukowe Kolegium Gospodarki Światowej SGH).
- Cited by
- ISSN
- 2300-6102
- Language
- pol
- URI / DOI
- http://dx.doi.org/10.4467/23539496IB.13.036.2421