BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Author
Stefanicki Robert (University of Wrocław, Poland)
Title
The Implications of Adopting the Model of Complete Harmonization (A Case Study)
Source
Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics, 2011, vol. 1, nr 1, s. 1-11
Keyword
Nieuczciwa konkurencja, Ochrona konsumenta, Prawo
Unfair competition, Consumer protection, Law
Note
summ.
Abstract
Significant difficulties in the practical application of the transposed legislation appear in the model of complete harmonization. They cover both the more precisely-defined scope of the Directive on unfair B2C commercial practice, as well as the possibility of maintaining national derogations from the exhaustive list set out in detail concerning absolute prohibitions effective in all conditions. These issues concern the judgment of the Court of Justice in the Mediaprint Zeitungs- und Zeitschriftenverlag GmbH & Co KG case, in which it '...hereby rules, that the Directive must be interpreted as precluding a national provision, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which lays down a general prohibition on sales with bonuses and is not only designed to protect consumers but also pursues other objectives.' It is desirable that those commercial practices which are in all circumstances unfair be identified to provide greater legal certainty. Lists of unfair clauses make it easier for traders, consumers, and courts or authorities to determine the meaning of the general clause. Member States may not adopt stricter rules than those provided for in the Directive, even in order to achieve a higher level of consumer protection. But the far-reaching consequence discussed in the paper justifies posing questions about the best level of consumer protection and which harmonization regime should be chosen for it. (original abstract)
Full text
Show
Bibliography
Show
  1. Christiane Wendehorst, Das deutsche Umsetzungskonzept für die neue Verbraucherkreditrichtlinie (2011) 2 "Zeitschrift für europäisches Privatrechts" 267ff.
  2. Delphine Lahet, Frédérique Julienne, La Directive européenne sur les contrats de crédit aux consommateurs: quelles opportunités pour lesconsommateurs européens et les opérations transfrontières? (2010) 2 "Revue Internationalede Droit Economique" 185.
  3. Case C-261/07 VTB-VAB NV v Total Belgium NV [2009].
  4. C-299/07 Galatea BVBA v Sanoma Magazines Belgium NV [2009] ECR I-2949.
  5. C-304/08 Plus Warenhandelsgesellschaft [2010], not yet published.
  6. http://www.dbj.co.at/VorlesungBrugger/Vorlesung2009/neuntedoppelstunde.pdf, p. 13.
  7. Andreas Wiebe, Georg Kodek, Kommentar zum UWG: Gesetz gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerb (Manzsche Verlags- und Universitätsbuchhandlung 2009).
  8. Joshua Sibble, Recent Developments in Internet Law (2011) 4 "Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal" 15.
  9. Giuseppe Abbamonte, The unfair commercial practices directive and its general Prohibition in Stephen Weatherill, Ulf Bernitz (eds), The regulation of unfair commercial practices under EC Directive 2005/29: New rules and new techniques (Hart Publishing Oregon 2007) 11.
  10. Steffen Huck and Brian Wallace, The impact of price frames on consumer decision Making Office of Fair Trading May 2010 (accessed 7 May2011).
  11. Brian C Hill Measuring media market diversity: concentration, importance, and Pluralism Federal Communications Law Journal (accessed 7 May2011).
  12. Robert Lande, Neil Averitt, Consumer Sovereignty: A Unified Theory of Antitrust and Consumer Protection Law (1997) 2 "Antitrust Law Journal" 713.
  13. Robert Lande, Neil Averitt, Using the Consumer Choice Approach to Antitrust Law (2007) 1 "Antitrust Law Journal" 175.
  14. Deborah Garza, Jonathan Yarowsky, Bobby Burchfield, Stephen Cannon,Dennis Carlton, Makan Delrahim, Jonathan Jacobson, Donald Kempf, Stanford Litvack, John Shenefield, Debra Valentine, John Warden, Antitrust Modernization Commission Report and Recommendations (Stratford, Connecticut 2007) 322.
  15. C Twigg-Flesner, D Parry, The challenges posed by the implementation of the directive into domestic law- UK perspective in Stephen Weatherill, Ulf Bernitz (eds) The regulation of unfair commercial practices under EC Directive 2005/29: New rules and new techniques (Hart Publishing Oregon 2007) 215.
  16. R Stefanicki, Prawo reklamy w świetle przepisów ustawy o zwalczaniu nieuczciwej konkurencji na tle prawnoporównawczym (Ars boni et aequi 2003) 59.
  17. Ch Wendehorst, B Zöchling-Jud, Verbraucherkreditrecht (Manzsche Verlags und Universitätsbuchhandlung 2010) 5.
  18. Bartosz Kurcz, Dyrektywy Wspólnoty Europejskiej i ich implementacja do prawa krajowego (Zakamycze 2004) 86ff.
  19. Jules Stuyck, The interaction between the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive and Competition Law in R Stefanicki (ed) Current Tendencies in Consumer Law (Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego 2010) 211.
  20. Case C-96/95 Commission v Germany [1997] ECR I-1653.
  21. Commission v Italy (C-49/00) [2001] ECR I-8575.
  22. Commission v Italy (C-410/03) [2005] ECR I-3507.
  23. Huge Collins, Harmonization by example: European laws against unfair commercial practices (2010) 1 "Modern Law Review" 103.
  24. Geraint Howells, Co-regulation's Role in the Development of European Fair Trading Laws in Huge Collins (ed), The Forthcoming EC Directive on Unfair Commercial Practices: Contract, Consumer & Competition Law Implications (Kluwer Law International2004) 124.
  25. Jules Stuyck, Evelyne Terryn, Tom Van Dyck, Confidence through fairness? The new directive on unfair business-to-consumer practices in the internal market (2006) 43 "Common Market Law Review" 130.
  26. Norbert Reich, Full harmonization of EU consumer law - fiction or friction? - Some problem areas in Robert Stefanicki (ed) Current Tendencies in Consumer Law (Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego 2010)145.
  27. Hans-Wolfgang Micklitz, Jules Stuyck, Evelyne Terryn, Cases, Materials and Text on Consumer Law (Hart Publishing 2010) 591.
  28. http://ochronakonsumenta.prawo.uni.wroc.pl/forum/index.php?topic=337.0
  29. Robert Stefanicki, Nieuczciwe praktyki handlowe w świetle prawodawstwa Unii Europejskiej -dyrektywa 2005/29 (Difin S.A. 2007) 203.
  30. Oliver Castendyk, Egbert Dommering, Alexander Scheuer, European media law (Kluwer Law International 2008) 53.
  31. Lautsi and others v Italy, applicationno. 30814/06 (ECHR, 11 March 2011), http://www.echr.coe.int/echr/resources/hudoc/lautsi_and_others_v__italy.pdf (accessed 7May 2011).
  32. Case C-522/08 Polish Telecom SA in Warsaw v President of the Office of Electronic Communications not yet published.
  33. Brigitta Jud, Christiane Wendehorst, Neuordnung des Verbraucherprivatrechts in Europa? Zum Vorschlag einer Richtlinie über Rechte der Verbraucher (MANZ'sche 2009)2.
  34. Most recent judgement of the Court on 16 June 2011 in case C-65/09 Gebr. Weber GmbH v Jürgen Wittmer, and C-87/09 Ingrid Putz v Medianess Electronics GmbH, not yet published.
  35. Most recent judgment of the Court on 12 May 2011 in Case C-122/10 I, not yet published.
  36. Michael Martinek, Unsystematische Überregulierung undkontraintentionale Effekte im Europäischen Verbraucherschutzrecht oder: Weniger wäremehr, in Systembildung und Systemlücken in Stefan Grundmann (ed), Kerngebieten des Europäischen Privatrechts (Mohr Siebeck 2000) 530.
  37. Report: Schwab (A7-0038/2011), P7_TA-PROV(2011) 0293.
  38. Commission staff working document accompanying the proposal for a directive onconsumer right, Impact Assessment Report, http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/rights/docs/impact_assessment_report_en.pdf (accessed 7May 2011).
  39. Fernando Gomez Gomez, Juan José Ganuza, An Economic Analysis of Harmonization Regimes: Full Harmonization, Minimum Harmonization or Optional Instrument?, Conference in Leuven, 14-15 January 2011: A European Optional Contract Law: Policy Choices (conference materials).
Cited by
Show
ISSN
2084-1264
Language
eng
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu