BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Szaniszló Inocent-Mária V. (Inštitút aplikovanej etiky Alexandra Spesza, Teologicka Fakulta, Katolícka Univerzita Ružomberok v Košiciach, Slovakia)
Novonarodenci versus opice. Pokus o kritiku znovuobjavenej teórie druhizmu
Novonarodenci Versus Monkey. An Attempt to Critique the Newly Discovered Theory Druhizmu
Humanum. Międzynarodowe Studia Społeczno-Humanistyczne, 2011, nr 7 (2), s. 71-78, bibliogr. 16 poz.
Humanum. International Social and Humanist Studies
Bioetyka, Etyka
Bioethics, Ethics
Recently, in our Slovakian companies, a lively debate on the protection of human life and the need to seek a proper relation to the handling of human embryos.Many media controversy dealt with the issue, since the man in their embryonicdevelopment deserve protection, and since (if at all) we can talk about some earlyhuman life. Many times we can not find a satisfactory answer that would satisfyboth opinions, but in practice we should be looking to ensure that all biomedicalpractices that are currently in use were in accordance with the ethics and (moral)natural law. But today, despite the belief that each person's life should be protected under that law, which protects the life and honor, and also echo the view that in certainspecial cases that can break the law. Eg. induced abortion, artificial insemination,cloning, euthanasia, and the like. If one were to judge when a human life worth more or less, as their time Peter Singer has argued, we would admit that life itselfand therefore man is not always the same price. The consequence would be that a person can be deprived of life at any time, without us ever broke the law. It istherefore necessary to think more deeply about it and stressed that human life isalways the same value from the beginning until its end. And therefore, certainly notonly such, as it has for decades advocated druhizmu Singer theory. (original abstract)
Full text
  1. ALGERMISSEN: Embryo entwickelt sich ´als Mensch, nicht zum Menschen´, (28.11.2010)
  2. Inštrukcia Kongregacie pre nauku viery z 8.12.2008: Dignitas Personae. O niektorych otazkach bioetiky. /dbk2.vas/ve_183.pdf (27. 12. 2008)
  3. MOORE, G. E.: Principio Ethica. Stuttgart: Reclam 1970.
  4. SCHLEGEL, A.: Die Indentitat der Person. Eine Auseinandersetzung mit Peter Singer. Fribourg: Academic Press Fribourg+Herder 2007.
  5. SCHOCKENHOFF, E.: Ethik des Lebens. Mainz: Matthias Gruenewald 1993.
  6. SCHOCKENHOFF E., Ethik des Lebens. Grundlagen und neue Herausforderungen. Freiburg: Herder 2009.
  7. SINGER, P.: Praktische Ethik. Stuttgart: Ditzingen Reclam 1984.
  8. SINGER, P.: Befreiung der Tiere. Mnichov: Hirthammer 1982
  9. SINGER P.: Spisy o etickom žiti. Bratislava: Vydavateľstvo Spolku slovesnkych spisovateľov 2008.
  10. SZANISZLO, I.-M. V.: Su naboženstva ohrozenim, alebo nadejou pre dnešny svet? In: Duchovny pastier. Revue pre teologiu a duchovny život, č. 2, 2009, s. 100-105.
  11. SYKORA, P.: Prečo život každej ľudskej zygoty netreba bezpodmienečne chraniť? In: Filozofia, roč. 63, 2008, č. 9, s. 804-816.
  12. SYKORA, P.: Treba život každej ľudskej zygoty bezpodmienečne chraniť? In Filozofia, roč. 61, 2006, č. 7, s. 562-568.
  13. VIRT, G.: Das Menschenleben an seinem Beginn. In: GRUNDEL (ed.), Leben aus christlicher verantwortung. Ein Grundkurs der Moral. Dusseldorf: Patmos-Verl. Diel III. 1991.
  14. WEBER, H.: Spezielle Moraltheologie. Graz: Styria 1999.
  15. WILDFEUER, A. G.: "Person" und "Mensch". Anmerkung zu einer folgenreichen
  16. Unterscheidung in der aktuellen Diskussion um Leben und Tod. In: Arzt und Christ. r. 38 s. 201-211, Nove vydanie in SCHOCKENHOFF, E. (ed.): Medizinische Ethik im Wandel. Grundlagen-Konkretionen-Perspektiven, Ostfildern: Schwabenverlag 2005, s. 86-96.
Cited by
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu