BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Author
Odrobina Anna (Cracow University of Economics, Poland / Wydział Ekonomii i Stosunków Międzynarodowych)
Title
Patent Pools in Light of European Union Competition Law
Source
Ekonomia i Prawo, 2014, t. 13, nr 4, s. 523-532, bibliogr. 20 poz.
Economics and Law
Keyword
Patenty, Ochrona patentowa, Transfer technologii, Polityka antymonopolowa, Prawo konkurencji
Patent, Patent protection, Technology transfer (TT), Antitrust policy, Competition law
Note
summ.
Company
Unia Europejska (UE)
European Union (EU)
Abstract
The functioning of patent pools leads to specific benefits in the transfer of technologies, and it accelerates technological advancement and provides easy access to technologies. Therefore, one could expect that the European Union (EU) - an organization which attempts to gain competitive advantage of its economy on the basis of knowledge and technology - should support patent pools. However, due to the possibility of anti-competitive practices, the functioning of patent pools is subject to EU legislation and competition laws. In this context patent pools pose a challenge in the area of reconciling the process of supporting technological advancement with the protection of fair competition. The paper presents an analysis of EU regulations in the area of patent pools. The author assesses the pro- and anti-competitive effects of activities carried out by patent pools. The further part of the paper discusses an evolution of the EU's approach to such organizations, presenting specific patent pool laws in the context of technology transfer agreements. Finally, the author presents some specific problems and future changes related to EU competition laws with respect to patent pools. (original abstract)
Full text
Show
Bibliography
Show
  1. Clark J., Stanton B., Tyson K., Patent pools: a solution to the problem of access in biotechnology patents?, USPTO, Alexandria 2000.
  2. Craig P., de Burca G., The Evolution of EU Law, Oxford University Press, New York 2011.
  3. European Commission, Commission consults on proposal for revised competition regime for technology transfer agreements, "Memo" 13/120, Brussels 2013.
  4. European Commission, Guidelines on the application of Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to technology transfer agreements, European Union, Brussels 2013.
  5. European Commission, Guidelines on the Application of Article 81 of the EC Treaty to Technology Transfer Agreements, OJ C 101/2004.
  6. European Union, Consolidated Versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, OJ C 83/01 Vol. 53/2010.
  7. Gilbert R.J., Antitrust for Patent Pools: A Century of Policy Evolution, "Stanford Technology Law Review", No. 3/2004, http://stlr.stanford.edu/STLR/Articles /04_ STLR_3 (10.09.2013).
  8. Komisja Europejska, Wytyczne w sprawie stosowania art. 101 Traktatu o funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej do porozumień o transferze technologii, Projekt Komunikatu Komisji, Bruksela 2013, C(2013)924.
  9. Lerner J., Strojwas M., Tirole J., The Design of Patent Pools: The Determinants of Licensing Rules, "RAND Journal of Economics", Vol. 38, No. 3/2007, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0741-6261.2007.00103.x.
  10. Lerner J., Tirole J., Efficient patent pools, NBER Working Paper, No 9175/2002.
  11. Odrobina A., Wspólnotowa polityka konkurencji wobec kwestii transferu technologii, [in:] E. Molendowski (ed.), Globalizacja i regionalizacja we współczesnym świecie, Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie, Kraków 2012.
  12. Regibeau P., Rockett K., Assessment of potential anticompetitive conduct in the field of intellectual property rights and assessment of the interplay between competition policy and IPR protection, European Union, Luxembourg 2011.
  13. Rozporządzenie Komisji nr 240/96 w sprawie stosowania art. 85, ust. 3 Traktatu do niektórych kategorii porozumień o transferze technologii, OJ L 031, 9.02.1996.
  14. Rozporządzenie Komisji nr 772/2004 w sprawie stosowania art. 81, ust. 3 Traktatu do kategorii porozumień o transferze technologii, OJ L 123/11, 27.04.2004.
  15. Rozporządzenie Rady nr 19/65/EWG w sprawie stosowania art. 85, ust. 3 do pewnych kategorii porozumień i praktyk uzgodnionych, DUWE 36/533, 6.03.1965.
  16. Sikorski R., Funkcjonowanie zasobów patentowych w prawie konkurencji Unii Europejskiej, Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck, Warszawa 2013.
  17. Sikorski R., Zwolnienia grupowe umów transferu technologii we wspólnotowym prawie konkurencji, [in:] C. Banasiński (ed.), Aktualne problemy polskiego i europejskiego prawa ochrony konkurencji, UOKiK, Warszawa 2006.
  18. Ullrich H., Patent pools: Approaching a patent law problem via competition policy, European University Institute, Florence 2005.
  19. Vakili K., Competitive Effects of Modern Patent Pools: The Effect of the MPEG-2 Pool on Incumbents? Innovative Performance, http://druid8.sit.aau.dk/acc_papers/ 95bqm6ond.pdf (10.09.2013).
  20. Verbeure B., van Zimmeren E., Mtthijs G., Van Overwalle G., Patent pools and diagnostic testing, "Trends in Biotechnology", Vol. 24, No. 3/2006, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.01.002.
Cited by
Show
ISSN
1898-2255
Language
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2014.037
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu