BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Koronkiewicz Grzegorz (University of Bialystok, Poland), Jamróz Paweł (University of Bialystok, Poland)
Comparison of the Tails of Market Return Distributions
Optimum : studia ekonomiczne, 2014, nr 5 (71), s. 103-113, rys., tab., bibliogr. s. 112-113
Rozkład Pareta, Teoria wartości ekstremalnych, Rozkład uogólniony, Zasada Pareto, Rynki giełdowe
Pareto distribution, Extreme Values Theory (EVT), Generalised distribution, Pareto principle, Stock markets
The aim of this study is to analyze the tails of the distributions of stock market returns and to compare the differences between them. It is a well-established fact that the vast majority of stock market return distributions exhibit fat tails (a bigger probability of extreme outcomes then in the case of the normal probability). Apart from that, there seems to be a popular opinion that most market returns are negatively skewed with a fatter left tail. The study utilizes two methods for comparing the tails of a distribution. A simple approached based on the sample kurtosis, with a modification that allows for the calculation of kurtosis separately for the right and the left tail of a single distribution and a more complex approach based on the maximum likelihood fitting of the Generalized Pareto Distribution to both tales of standardized return distributions. The second approach is based on the assumptions of the Extreme Value Theory (EVT) and the Pickands-Balkema-de Haan theorem. Both approaches provide similar conclusions. Results suggest that whether the left or the right tail of the return distribution is bigger varies from market to market. All four major equity indices of the Polish Warsaw Stock Exchange exhibited a fatter left tale. However, in the whole sample it was actually more common for the right tail to be heavier, with 12 indices out of 20 exhibiting a fatter right tail then the left. The sample kurtosis indicated that all stock market return's distributions were heavy tailed, whereas the estimates of Generalized Pareto Distribution parameters did indicate standard or thin tails in two cases. Statistical tests indicate that the differences between the tails of stock market distributions are not statistically significant. (original abstract)
The Library of Warsaw School of Economics
The Library of University of Economics in Katowice
Full text
  1. Bali T.G., Cakici N., Whitelaw R.F. 2013 Hybrid Tail Risk and Expected Stock Returns: When Does the Tail Wag the Dog?, Working Paper No. w19460, National Bureau of Economic Research.
  2. Balkema A.A., De Haan L. 1974 Residual Life Time at Great Age, "The Annals of Probability", pp. 792-804.
  3. Bollerslev T., Todorov V., Li S.Z. 2013 Jump Tails, Extreme Dependencies, and the Distribution of Stock Returns, "Journal of Econometrics", 172(2), DOI 10.1016/j.jeconom. 2012.08.014.
  4. Campbell J.Y., Hentschel L. 1992 No News is Good News: An Asymmetric Model of Changing Volatility in Stock Returns, "Journal of Financial Economics", Vol. 31(3), pp. 281-318.
  5. Cont R. 2001 Empirical Properties of Asset Returns: Stylized Facts and Statistical Issues, "Quantitative Finance", Vol. 1(2), DOI 10.1080/713665670.
  6. Fama E.F. 1965 The Behavior of Stock-Market Prices, "Journal of business", Vol. 3(1), p. 34-105.
  7. Fisher R.A., Tippett L.H.C. 192, Limiting Forms of the Frequency Distribution of the Largest or Smallest Member of a Sample, "Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society", Vol 24(02), DOI 100015681.
  8. Gnedenko B. 1943 Sur la distribution limite du terme maximum d'une serie aleatoire, "Annals of Mathematics", Vol. 44(3), p. 423-453.
  9. Groeneveld R.A. 1998 A Class of Quantile Measures for Kurtosis, "The American Statistician", Vol. 52(4), DOI 10.1080/00031305.1998.10480590.
  10. Groeneveld R.A., Meeden G. 1984 Measuring Skewness and Kurtosis, "Journal of the Royal Statistical Society", Vol. 33(4), 391- 399.
  11. Jarque C.M., Bera A.K. 1987 A test for normality of observations and regression residuals, "International Statistical Review", vol. 55, p. 163-172
  12. Jondeau E. 2010 Asymmetry in Tail Dependence of Equity Portfolios, Working Paper, DOI
  13. Jondeau E., Rockinger M. 2003 Testing for Differences in the Tails of Stock-Market Returns, "Journal of Empirical Finance", Vol. 10(5), DOI 10.1016/S0927-5398(03)00005- 7.
  14. Kahneman D., Tversky A. 1979 Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk, "Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society", Vol. XLVI, DOI 10.2307/ 1914185.
  15. Kanji G. K. 2006 100 Statistical Tests, Sage, London.
  16. Mandelbrot B.B. 1997 The Variation of Certain Speculative Prices, Springer, New York.
  17. Mann H.B., Whitney D.R. 1947 On a Test of whether one of two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the other, "The Annals of Mathematical Statistics", 50-60.
  18. Pickands III J. 1975 Statistical Inference Using Extreme Order Statistics, "The Annals of Statistics", p. 119-131.
  19. Thurner S., Farmer J.D., Geanakoplos J. 2012 Leverage Causes Fat Tails and Clustered Volatility, "Quantitative Finance", Vol. 12(5), DOI 10.1080/14697688.2012.674301.
  20. Wen F., Yang X. 2009 Skewness of Return Distribution and Coefficient of Risk Premium, "Journal of Systems Science and Complexity", Vol. 22(3), p. 360-371.
Cited by
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu