BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Author
Sosnowska Honorata (Warsaw School of Economics, Poland)
Title
The Rules for the Jury of the Fryderyk Chopin Piano Competition as a Non Standard Voting Rule
Regulamin obrad Jury Konkursu Chopinowskiego jako przykład niestandardowej metody głosowania
Source
Roczniki Kolegium Analiz Ekonomicznych / Szkoła Główna Handlowa, 2013, nr 32, s. 23-31, tab., bibliogr. 11 poz.
Issue title
Mechanism design and related topics
Keyword
Głosowanie, Konkursowy dobór kadry kierowniczej, Zastosowanie teorii gier
Voting, Competitive selection of management, Application of game theory
Note
streszcz., summ.
Abstract
W teorii gier zwykle zajmuje sie standardowymi metodami głosowania, takimi jak głosowanie wiekszoscia czy głosowanie aprobujace. W praktyce pewne nie standardowe, skomplikowane metody głosowania sa uzywane. W tej pracy prezentujemy metode głosowania jury Miedzynarodowego konkursu im. Fryderyka Chopina. Jest ona bardzo skomplikowana i niejasna. Pokazujemy pewne nieoczekiwane rezultaty tak skomplikowanej metody. (abstrakt oryginalny)

Game theoreticians usually deal with some standard voting methods such as plurality voting or approval voting. In reality however, some non standard more complex voting methods are used. In this paper we shall present the voting method used by the jury of the International Fryderyk Chopin Piano Competition. The voting method is very complicated and unclear. We present some unexpected effects of such a complicated voting rule. (original abstract)
Accessibility
The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics
The Library of Warsaw School of Economics
The Library of University of Economics in Katowice
The Main Library of Poznań University of Economics and Business
The Main Library of the Wroclaw University of Economics
Bibliography
Show
  1. Brams S., Fishburn P. (1983), Approval Voting, Boston, Birkkh¨aser.
  2. Gambarelli G. (2008), The 'coherent majority average' for juries' evaluation processes, "Journal of Sports Sciences" 26, pp. 1091-1095.
  3. Gambarelli G., Iaquinta G., Piazza M. (2012), Anti-collusion indices and Averages for the evaluation of performanves and judges, "Journal of Sports Sciences" 30, pp. 411-417.
  4. Łój A. (2011), Social choice method in 16th International Fryderyk Chopin Piano Competition, Master Thesis, Warsaw School of Economics (in Polish).
  5. Malawski M., Przybyszewski K., Sosnowska H. (2010), Cognitive effort of voters under three different voting methods - an experimental study, "Badania Operacyjne i Decyzje", (Operations Research and Decisions) 3-4 (2010), pp. 1-12.
  6. Nurmi H. (1987), Comparing Voting Systems, Dordrecht, D. Reidel.
  7. Przybysz D. (2000), Aggregation of the (sport) judges marks as a form of collective decision making, "Studia Socjologiczne" 1-2, pp. 105-136, (in Polish).
  8. Stec A. (2012), Theory of social choice. The offer of travel agencies, Bachelor Thesis, Warsaw School of Economics (in Polish).
  9. Tyszka T., Wielochowski M. (1991), Must boxing verdicts be biased, "Journal of Behavioral Decision Making" 4, pp. 283-295.
  10. Web 1: rules of the competition jury http://konkurs.chopin.pl/en/edition/xvi/rules/965 rules of the competition jury.
  11. Web 2: The Competition Newspaper, "Chopin Express 02", http://nifc.pl/ files/konkurs/chopin express/chopin express nr 0.
Cited by
Show
ISSN
1232-4671
Language
eng
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu