BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Author
Hashmi Hira (Iqra University, Karachi, Pakistan), Khan Naveed R. (Iqra University, Karachi, Pakistan), Haq Mirza A. (Iqra University, Karachi, Pakistan)
Title
The Impact of Lean Management Implementation on Organizational Operational Performance
Wpływ wdrożenia zarządzania typu lean na działania operacyjno-organizacyjne
Einfluss der Einführung von Lean-Management Auf Operativ-Organisatorisches Handeln
Source
LogForum, 2015, vol. 11, nr 4, s. 375-385, tab., rys., bibliogr. 19 poz.
Keyword
Działalność operacyjna, Harmonogram, Produkcja, Odchudzone zarządzanie, Regresja wielokrotna
Operating activities, Schedule, Production, Lean management, Multiple regression
Note
summ., streszcz., zfsg.
Abstract
    Wstęp: Celem pracy jest opracowanie konsensusu pomiędzy różnymi operacyjnymi strategiami usprawniającymi w celu znalezienia zależności pomiędzy operacyjnymi cechami organizacji a jej postępowaniem operacyjnym.
    Metody: Zmienne niezależne, które zostały użytego dla uzyskania zmiennej zależnej to działalność operacyjna, przestrzeganie dziennego harmonogramu, powtarzalność produkcji oraz schemat przepływu. Dane zostały poddane analizie korelacji i regresji wielokrotnej. Celem tych analiz był zbadanie zależności pomiędzy strategią Lean a działalnością operacyjną.
    Wyniki wnioski: Stwierdzono pozytywną zależność pomiędzy działalnością operacyjną a przestrzeganiem dziennego harmonogramu, powtarzalnością produkcji oraz schematem przepływu. Powinno to służyć jako wskazówka dla zarządzających łańcuchem dostaw aby dążyli do powtarzalności w swojej pracy, co pozwoli na osiągnięcie efektywności produkcji. Należy osiągnąć optymalny poziom, przy którym poziom strat będzie najniższy a poziom produkcji najwyższy. (abstrakt oryginalny)


    Background: The research aims to develop the consensus between different operational improvement strategies, to address the relationship between the operational characteristics (lean) and operational performance of the organization.
    Methods: Variables from which the extraction of the outcomes has been established include operational performance, daily schedule adherence, repeat production and flow oriented layout. The technique of data analysis is selected to be Correlation and multiple regressions. The aim for performing these tests is to highlight association of lean strategy with the operational performance.
    Results and conclusions: The positive association is being established amongst the operational performance and the daily schedule adherence, flow oriented layout and the repeat production. It is suggested to the supply chain management that they must entail their production team for having repetition in their work and become efficient in their production. They must be reached to their optimization level, where they have to extract less waste and have high level of the production. (original abstract)
Full text
Show
Bibliography
Show
  1. Aitken J., Christopher M., Towill D., 2002. Understanding, implementing and exploiting agility and leanness. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 5(1), 59-74.
  2. Angel M.S., Manuela P.P., 2001. Lean indicators and manufacturing strategies. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(11), 1433 - 1452.
  3. Azharul K., Kazi A., 2013. A methodology for effective implementation of lean strategies and its performance evaluation in manufacturing organizations. Business Process Management Journal, 19(1), 169 - 196.
  4. Carmen R., Wilson V.V., Betsy L.M., 2007. Understanding Power and Rules of Thumb for Determining Sample Sizes.Tutorials in Quantitative 3(2), 43-50.
  5. Dávid L., Krisztina D., 2013. Lean production and business performance: international empirical results. Competitiveness Review, 23 (3), 218 - 233.
  6. Dharmasri W., Vathsala W., 2012. Effects of perceived organizational support on participation in decision making, affective commitment and job satisfaction in lean production in Sri Lanka. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 23(2), 157 - 177.
  7. Jagdeep S., Harwinder S., 2012. Continuous improvement approach: state-of-art review and future implications. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 3(2), 88 - 111.
  8. Jamshed H.K., 2003. Impact of total quality management on productivity. The TQM Magazine, 15(6), 374 - 380.
  9. Jan S.A., Per V.F., 2013. Evidence of lean: a review of international peer-reviewed journal articles. European Business Review, 25(2), 174 - 205.
  10. Ki-Hoon L., In M., 2011. Measuring a carbon footprint and environmental practice: the case of Hyundai Motors Co. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 111(6), 961 - 978.
  11. Lokman M., Lanita W., 2014. Manufacturing strategy and organizational performance: The role of competition and MAS information. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 10(1), 83 - 115.
  12. Mattias H., Jan O., 2009. Lean and agile manufacturing: external and internal drivers and performance outcomes. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 29(10), 976 - 999.
  13. Mohamad A.N., Hom D., Ashraf L., Nick B., 2013. Lean readiness level within Kuwaiti manufacturing industries. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 4(3), 280 - 320.
  14. Peter H., Anders B., Per L.J., Pia B., 2012. Lean and the working environment: A review of the literature. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32(7), 829 - 849.
  15. Richard C., 2002. Is "lean" a universal production system?: Batch production in the automotive industry. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(10), 1130 - 1147.
  16. Sanjay B., 2011. Measuring the Leanness of an organization. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 2(1), 55 - 74.
  17. Sanjay B., 2013. Analysis of whether Lean is viewed as an ideology by British organizations. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 24(4), 536 - 554.
  18. Todd A.B., Maike S., Ian S., 2011. Learning to be lean: the influence of external information sources in lean improvements. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 22(5), 587 - 603.
  19. Veera P.K.S., Abdul R.I.V.G., Chandran G., 2011. Supply chain management practices in the electronics industry in Malaysia: Consequences for supply chain performance. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 18(6), 834 - 855.
Cited by
Show
ISSN
1895-2038
Language
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.17270/J.LOG.2015.4.6
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu