BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Ostapenko Karina (Baltic Institute of Psychology and Management Riga, Latvia)
Èmpiričeskoe issledovanie urovnâ refleksivnosti i gibkosti povedeniâ učitelej sredn
Empirical Studies of Reflexivity and Flexibility Level in the Behavior of Secondary School Teachers
De Securitate et Defensione. O Bezpieczeństwie i Obronności, 2015, nr 2, s. 48-56, wykr., tab., bibliogr. 14 poz.
Edukacja młodzieży, Nauczyciele, Jakość kadry nauczycielskiej
Youth education, Teachers, Quality of the teaching staff

The publication content includes the description of methodology and results for empirical research of relationship between secondary school teachers reflexivity and flexibility of behavior. The objective of the research is to describe and to explain the relationship character and mechanisms between reflexivity and flexibility of behavior. The materials used: reflectivity level determination method (А.В. Карпов, В.В. Понаморева, 2000); and the scale «flexibility of behavior» from the selfactualization test (САТ) (Personal Orientation Invento-ry - POI; 1987, E. Shostrom, modified by E. Alyoshina, L. Gozman, M. Zagik, M. Kroz). The selection was defined and reasoned. The achieved empirical data was processed with SPSS 17 software. The results were analyzed and interpreted. Relationship between reflexivity and flexibility of behavior was stated. 80 school teachers were recruited for this research: a group of 30-40-year old people (40 people; age median 37 years) and a group of 50-60-year old people, (40 people; age median 56 years). (original abstract)
Full text
  1. Adams Matthew. 2006. "Hybridizing habitus and reflexivity". Sociology 40 : 511-528.
  2. Archer Margaret S. 2007. Human Reflexivity and Social Mobility. Cambridge University Press.
  3. Barge J. Kevin. 2004. Reflexivity and managerial practice. Communication Monographs Vol 71, Iss 1 : 70-96.
  4. Boud David. 2001. Using journal writing to enhance reflective practice. In English, L. M. and Gillen, M.A. (Eds.) Promoting Journal Writing in Adult Education. New Directions in Adult and Continuing Education No. 90. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass : 9-18.
  5. Donati Pierpaolo. 2010. Reflexivity after modernity: From the viewpoint of relational sociol-ogy. In: Margaret Scotford Archer (ed.). Conversations about Reflexivity. London: Routledge.
  6. Dörner Dietrich. 1978. Self-Reflection and Problem Solving. In F. Klix (Ed.): Human and Ar-tificial Intelligence. Berlin: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.
  7. Flavell J. H., Wellman H. M. Metamemory. 1977. In: R. V. Kail, G. W. Hag-en (Eds.) Perspectives on the development of memory and cognition. Hillsdale, N. Y.: Erlbaum.
  8. Reither F. 1980. Selfreflective cognitive processes: Its characteristics and effects. In XXII-nd International Congress of Psychology Vol I. Leipzig.
  9. Бреслав Г. 2011.Основы психологического исследования. Т. 8. № 2. С. 156-160.
  10. Блюменау Н.Ф. 2011. Обработка, анализ и интерпретация данных исследований в психологии и социальных науках.
  11. Карпов А. В., Пономарева В. В. 2000. Психология рефлексивных механизмов управления. Москва: ИП РАН.
  12. Карпов А. В., Скитяева И. М. 2002.Психология рефлексии. Москва: ИП РАН.
  13. Психологическая диагностика. Проблемы и исследования. 1981. Москва: Педагогика.
  14. Степанов С. Ю., Семенов И. Н., Новикова Е. Р.1984. Типы и функции рефлексии в организации принятия решения оператором. - В кн.: Проблемы инженерной психологии.
Cited by
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu