BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Author
Lanfranchi Maurizio (University of Messina, Italy), Giannetto Carlo (University of Messina, Italy), DePascale Angelina (University of Messina, Italy), Khatcharyan Yulia (University ofKemerovo, Russia)
Title
A Cooperative Company in Agriculture: Feasibility Analysis of a Start-up Project
Spółdzielnia w rolnictwie: analiza wykonalności projektu start-up
Source
Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia, 2016, nr 4 (82) Cz.1, s. 113-122, bibliogr. 16 poz.
Issue title
Pomiar i ocena wyników przedsiębiorstw
Keyword
Spółdzielczość rolnicza, Przedsiębiorstwo typu start-up, Rolnictwo
Agricultural cooperation, Startup, Agriculture
Note
streszcz., summ.
Abstract
Cel - Celem badania jest analiza dynamiki gospodarczej i finansowej spółdzielni rolniczej w fazie początkowej. Metodologia - Badanie rozpoczyna się od analizy alternatywnych form produktów marketingowych, które są niezbędne do określenia pola operacyjnego firmy. Finansowanie przedsiębiorstw spółdzielczych zawsze było niezwykle istotną kwestią w zarządzanie tego typu działalności. Istotnie, parametry techniczne i prawne tych firm mają ograniczone możliwości do źródeł finansowania. Oryginalność/wartość - W całej tej pracy, staraliśmy się zaproponować instrumenty finansowe, które najlepiej odpowiadają na potrzeby spółdzielni rolnej w fazie początkowej.(abstrakt oryginalny)

Purpose - The research objective is to analyse the economic and financial dynamics of an agricultural cooperative in a start-up phase. Design/methodology/approach - The research starts from an analysis of the alternative forms of product marketing, which is necessary to identify the operational field of the company that is going to be set up, and focuses on raising those financial resources which are necessary to allow the start and the ordinary course of the business. The financing of cooperative companies has always been a remarkably relevant issue in the management of this type of business. Indeed, the technical and legal features of these companies have limited the access to possible financing sources and, in particular, to venture capital acquisitions. Originality/value - Throughout this work, we tried to suggest the financial instruments best suited to meeting the needs of an agriculture company in a start-up phase and, in this respect, in an economic situation like the present one, assisted finance may represent a useful instrument. However, the opportunities that it offers at different levels are often unknown or not perceived for their complexity and for the lack of clear and homogeneous information.(original abstract)
Accessibility
The Library of University of Economics in Katowice
The Main Library of Poznań University of Economics and Business
Full text
Show
Bibliography
Show
  1. Beierle T.C. (2002). The Quality of Stakeholder-based Decision. Risk Analysis, 22 (4), 739-749.
  2. Bellows A.C.E., Nasr J. (2010). On the past and the future of the urban agriculture movement: reflections in tribute to Jac Smit. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development.
  3. Bernstein P.L. (1998). Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  4. Bodemann M., Olaru, M. (2014). Responsibility to customers in the context of public value management - A German case study. Amfiteatru Economic, 16 (35), 171-186.
  5. Bryson J.M. (2004). What to do when stakeholders matter: A Guide to stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Public Management Review, 6 (1), 21-53.
  6. Clarkson M.B.E., (1995). A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance. The Academy of Management Review, 20 (1), 92-117.
  7. Cooper D.F., Chapman C.B. (1987). Risk Analysis for Large Projects: Models, Methods, and Cases. Chichester: John Wiley.
  8. Crescimanno M., Galati A., Bal T. (2014). The role of the economic crisis on the competitiveness of the agri-food sector in the main Mediterranean countries. Agricultural Economics (Czech Republic), 60 (2), 49-64.
  9. D'Amico M., Coppola A., Chinnici G., Di Vita G., Pappalardo G. (2013). Agricultural systems in the European Union: An analysis of regional differences. New Medit, 12 (4), 28-34.
  10. Eden C., Ackermann F. (1998). Making Strategy. The Journey of Strategic Management. London: Sage Publications.
  11. Frame J.D. (2003). Managing risk in organizations. A guide for managers. Washington: Jossey-Bass.
  12. Lanfranchi M., Giannetto C., De Pascale A. (2014). The role of nature-based tourism in generating multiplying effects for socio economic development of rural areas. Quality - Access to Success, 15 (140), 96-100.
  13. Mǎzǎreanu V.-P. (2013). Considerations on risk in supply chain management information systems implementation. Amfiteatru Economic, 15 (33), 128-139.
  14. Paraschiv D.M., Nemoianu E.L., Langa C.A., Szabó T. (2012). Eco-innovation, responsible leadership and organizational change for corporate sustainability. Amfiteatru Economic, 14 (32), 404-419.
  15. Sgroi F., Candela M., Di Trapani A.M., Foderà M., Squatrito R., Testa R., Tudisca S. (2015). Economic and financial comparison between organic and conventional farming in Sicilian lemon orchards. Sustainability (Switzerland), 7 (1), 947-961.
  16. Wheeler D., Sillanpaa M. (1997). The Stakeholder Corporation: a blueprint for maximising stakeholder value. London: Pitman Publishing.
Cited by
Show
ISSN
2450-7741
Language
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.18276/frfu.2016.4.82/1-09
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu