BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Pyszka Adrian (University of Economics in Katowice, Poland)
Socially Responsible Innovations (SRI) from a Transactional Cost Perspective - a Chance for Growth and Development or a Waste of Time and Money?
Business and Non-profit Organizations Facing Increased Competition and Growing Customers' Demands, 2012, vol. 11, s. 57-72, tab., bibliogr. 25 poz.
Inwestowanie społecznie odpowiedzialne, Społeczna odpowiedzialność biznesu, Koszty transakcyjne, Otwarte innowacje
Socially responsible investing (SRI), Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Transaction cost, Open innovation
This article is devoted to looking at innovations from the perspective of Transaction Cost Economics (TCE) and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). In analyzing the substance of the theory the author intends to show the potential challenges that will create socially responsible innovation, especially in combination with transaction costs arising from the need to build relationships with stakeholders. The author puts forward a number of proposals in an attempt to integrate presented solutions indicating the objective of the development and implementation of responsible innovation in modern organizations. (original abstract)
Full text
  1. Argyres N.S., Porter Liebeskind J., Contractual Commitments, Bargaining Power, And Governance Inseparability: Incorporating History Into Transaction Cost Theory, Academy of Management Review, 1999, Vol.24, No. 1, 49-63
  2. Bartlett D., Embedding corporate responsibility: the development of a transformational model of organizational innovation, "Corporate Governance", (2009) pp.409-420
  3. Brice J., Millicent Nelson M. White Gunby N., Jr, The Governance Of Telecommuters: An Agency And Transaction Cost Analysis, Academy of Strategic Management Journal, Volume 10, Number 1, 2011
  4. Chesbrough H.W., Garman A.R.,, Otwarta innowacyjność: recepta na trudne czasy, "HBRP" 2010 Listopad
  5. Drucker P.: Natchnienie i fart, czyli innowacja i przedsiębiorczość.Studio Emka, 2004
  6. Geva A., Three Models of Corporate Social Responsibility: Interrelationships between Theory, Research, and Practice, "Business and Society Review", 2008, 113: 1, 1-41
  7. Geyskens I., Steenkamp J-B.E.M., Kumar N., MAKE, BUY, OR ALLY: A TRANSACTION COST THEORY META-ANALYSIS, Academy of Management Journal, 2006, Vol. 49, No. 3, 519-543.
  8. Ghoshal S., Moran P., Bad for Practice: A Critique of the Transaction Cost Theory, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 21, No. 1 (Jan., 1996), pp. 13-47
  9. Grayson D., W poszukiwaniu nowej definicji wartości, "HBRP", Dodatek - Odpowiedzialny Biznes 2010 (wywiad Piłat K.)
  10. Henderson R.M., Clark K.B., Architecturai Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1990): 9-30
  11. Hollender J., Brenn B., (2010), The Responsibility Revolution: How the Next Generation of Business Will Win, Jossey-Bass, [w:] Bielewicz A., (2010), Odpowiedzialność 2.0, "HBRP", dodatek "Odpowiedzialny Biznes 2010", s.10
  12. Husted B.W., Folger R., Fairness and Transaction Costs: The Contribution of Organizational Justice Theory to an Integrative Model of Economic Organization, Organization Science Vol. 15, No. 6, November-December 2004, pp. 719-729
  13. Jenkins H., (2009), A 'Business Opportunity' Model of Corporate Social Responsibility for Small- and Medium- Sized Enterprises, "Business Ethics" Vol. 18, No. 1, January
  14. Kwon I-W. G., Suh T., Factors Affecting the Level of Trust and Commitment in Supply Chain Relationships, Journal of Supply Chain Management, Spring 2004, 40,2
  15. Lohr S., The Crowd Is Wise (When It's Focused),"The New York Times", July 18, 2009,
  16. MacGregor S.P., Fontrodona J.: Exploring The Fit Between CSR And Innovation. Working Paper, WP-759, July, 2008
  17. Meyer Ch., Kirby J., Leadership in the Age of Transparency, HBR, April 2010
  18. Midttun A., Dirdal T., Gautesen K., Omland T., Wenstøp S., Integrating Corporate Social Responsibility and Other Strategic Foci in a Distributed Production System - A Transaction Cost Perspective on the North Sea Offshore Petroleum Industry, BI Norwegian School of Management, Research Report 11/2005
  19. Nidumolu R., Prahalad S.K. i Rangaswami R.: Why Sustainability Is Now The Key Driver Of Innovation. HBR, Sep2009, Vol. 87 Issue 9, pp.56-64
  20. Paauwe J., Boselie P., Challenging 'strategic HRM' and the relevance of the institutional setting, Human Resource Management Journal; 2003; 13, 3; pg. 56-70
  21. Porter M.E., Kramer M.R.: Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility, HBR, Dec 2006,pp. 78-92
  22. Pyszka A., CSR jako narzędzie pobudzania przedsiębiorstwa do innowacyjnego modelu działania, "Współczesne Zarządzanie", 4/2011
  23. Sawhney M., Wolcott R.C., Arroniz I., The 12 Different Ways for Companies to Innovate, MITSloan Management Review, Spring 2006, vol. 47 no. 3
  24. Williamson O.E., Ekonomiczne Instytucje kapitalizmu. Firmy, rynki, relacje kontraktowe. PWN, Warszawa 1998
  25. Wolter C., Veloso F.M., The Effects Of Innovation On Vertical Structure: Perspectives On Transaction Costs And Competences, Academy of Management Review 2008, Vol. 33, No. 3, 586-605
Cited by
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu