BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Author
Jarosz-Angowska Aneta (University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Poland), Kąkol Magdalena Katarzyna (Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin, Poland)
Title
Comparative Analysis of Support to Agriculture in the QUAD Countries in 1986-2014
Source
Zeszyty Naukowe SGGW w Warszawie. Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, 2016, t. 16(31), z. 4, s. 140-154, tab., bibliogr. 28 poz.
Scientific Journal Warsaw University of Life Sciences SGGW - Problems of Word Agriculture
Keyword
Wspieranie rolnictwa, Dotacje
Agriculture support, Subsidies
Note
streszcz., summ.
Company
Unia Europejska (UE)
European Union (EU)
Country
Japonia, Stany Zjednoczone Ameryki, Kanada, Kraje OECD
Japan, United States of America (USA), Canada, OECD countries
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is a comparative analysis of support provided to agriculture sector by the QUAD countries in 1986-2014. The authors examined the changes in levels and structures of this support and tried to assess it from the point of view of its impact on the QUAD economies and markets. In the analysis conducted there were used especially the OECD data and indexes measuring state support to agriculture including: Total Support Estimate, Producer Support Estimate, General Services Support Estimate and Consumer Support Estimate. In the last three decades in all the examined economies, there has been a reduction in agricultural support in relation to GDP, although no distinct change has occurred in terms of the amount of aid in absolute terms (in the US its value even increased almost twice). As regards the changes in structure of support, the most favorable tendencies took place in the European Union where the market price support (MPS), i.e. the most distorting aid to the functioning of the market mechanism, was significantly reduced. One can also positively assess the support structure in the United States where about half of the agricultural budget is earmarked to consumers. Canada has very good economic outcomes as regard the agriculture sector even though it allocates the least amount of financial resources to support agriculture in relation to GDP among all the QUAD economies. However, despite a large part of this support is in the form of general services (GSSE), the country is characterized by an unfavorable trend of increasing expenditure on price support. Throughout the period considered the most harmful support policy from the point of view of market competition was led by Japan though it has affected to a lesser extent the functioning of international agri-food markets due to the lower importance of Japanese agricultural production and exports in the world economy in comparison to the EU and the US. (original abstract)
Full text
Show
Bibliography
Show
  1. Baldwin, R., Wyplosz, C. (2009). The Economics of European Integration. Third Edition. McGraw-Hill Higher Education Publishing, 353-378.
  2. Czyżewski, A., Poczta-Wajda, A. (2011). Polityka rolna w warunkach globalizacji. Doświadczenia GATT/WTO. PWE, Warszawa.
  3. Edwards, C. (2009). Agricultural Subsidies. CATO Institute. [Available at:] http://circle.org/jsource/agriculturalsubsidies- by-chris-edwards/. [Access: November 2015].
  4. El-Agraa, A.M. (2001). The European Union. Economics & Policies. Sixth edition. Pearson Education Ltd.
  5. European Commission (2015). Price developments and links to food security - price level and volatility. EU Agricultural Markets Briefs. No 5/June.
  6. FAO (2016). FAOstat database. [Available at:] http://faostat3.fao.org/download/Q/QV/E. [Access: July 2016].
  7. Hillman, J.S., Rothenberg, R.A. (1985). Wider Implications of Protecting Japan's Rice Farmers. The World Economy Vol. 8, 43-62, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9701.1985.tb00377.x.
  8. Jones, R.S., Kimura, S. (2013). Reforming Agriculture and Promoting Japan's Integration in the World Economy, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1053,OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k46957l0rf4-en.
  9. Mucha-Leszko, B. (2004). Ewolucja wspólnej polityki rolnej UE - przesłanki i uwarunkowania zmian systemowych. Annales UMCS. Sectio H, Vol. XXXVIII, 25-44.
  10. OECD (2015a). Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation 2015.
  11. OECD (2015b). Introduction to the OECD Producer Support Estimate and related indicators of agricultural support. [Available at:] http://www.oecd.org/tad/agricultural-policies/pse-introduction-august-final.pdf [Access: November 2015].
  12. OECD (2015c). Producer and Consumer Support Estimates. OECD Agriculture statistics (database). DOI: dx.doi.org/10.1787/agr-pcse-data-en. [Available at:] http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/agriculture-and-food/data/oecd-agriculture-statistics_agr-data-en. [Access: November 2015].
  13. OECD (2016a). Evolving Agricultural Policies and Markets: Implications for Multilateral Trade Reform. OECD Publishing, Paris. [Available at:] http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264264991-en. [Access: November 2016].
  14. OECD (2016b). Innovation, Agricultural Productivity and Sustainability in the United States. OECD Food and Agricultural Reviews. OECD Publishing, Paris, forthcoming. [Available at:] http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264264120-en. [Access: November 2016].
  15. OECD (2016c). Purchasing Power Parities (PPP) Statistics. OECD.Stat Database. DOI: 10.1787/data-00285-en. [Available at:] http://stats.oecd.org.00001cmm07e5.han.bg.umcs.edu.pl/index.aspx?r=862214. [Access: November 2016].
  16. Pelkmans, J. (2001). European Integration. Methods and Economic Analysis. Second edition. Pearson Education Ltd.
  17. Rieger. E. (2005). Agricultural policy. Constrained reforms [in:] Policy-Making in the European Union. Edited by Wallace Helen, Wallace William & Pollack Mark A. Fifth Edition. Oxford University Press, pp. 161-190.
  18. Swinnen, J. (2015). The Political Economy of the 2014-2020 Common Agricultural Policy. An Imperfect Storm. Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), Brussels.
  19. USDA (2016). Economic Research Service, International Agricultural Productivity: Agricultural total factor productivity growth indices for individual countries, 1961-2013. Updated on 10.7.2016. [Available at:] http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/international-agricultural-productivity.aspx. [Access: July 2016].
  20. Winters, L.A. (1987). The Economic Consequences of Agricultural Support: a Survey. OECD Economic Studies No. 9. OECD Publishing, 7-54.
  21. Winters, L.A. (1988). The So-Called "Non-Economic" Objectives of Agricultural Policy. OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 52. OECD Publishing, DOI: 10.1787/148132766818.
  22. Wojtas, M. (2007). Koszty wspólnej polityki rolnej a problem transferów finansowych i dochodów zatrudnionych w rolnictwie [in:] Biuletyn Europejski - Wydanie Specjalne, 50 lat Traktatów Rzymskich. Sukcesy i trudne realia integracji europejskiej. Edited by Mucha-Leszko Bogumiła. Wyd. UMCS, Lublin.
  23. World Bank (2016a). World Bank Commodity Price Data (The Pink Sheet). Updated on November 02, 2016. [Available at:] http://www.worldbank.org/en/research/commodity-markets. [Access: November 2016].
  24. World Bank (2016b). World Development Indicators Database. [Available at:] http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=world-development-indicators. [Access: July 2016].
  25. WTO (2006). World Trade Report 2006. Exploring the links between subsidies, trade and the WTO.
  26. WTO (2015a). International Trade Statistics 2015.
  27. WTO (2015b). WTO statistical database. [Available at:] http://stat.wto.org/StatisticalProgram/WSDBStatProgram Series.aspx?Language=E. [Access: November 2015].
  28. Yamashita, K. (2006). Food and Agriculture Problems for Japan and the World in the Twenty-first Century. Asia-Pacific Review, Vol. 13, No. 1, 1-16.
Cited by
Show
ISSN
2081-6960
Language
eng
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu