BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Author
Bartłomowicz Tomasz (Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we Wrocławiu)
Title
Analiza porównawcza pakietów metody Analytic Hierarchy Process programu R
Comparative Analysis of Analytic Hierarchy Process R Packages
Source
Informatyka Ekonomiczna / Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we Wrocławiu, 2016, nr 3 (41), s. 9-18, rys., tab., bibliogr. 22 poz.
Business Informatics / Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we Wrocławiu
Keyword
Analityczny proces hierarchiczny, Informatyka ekonomiczna, Podejmowanie decyzji
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Business informatics, Decision making
Note
streszcz., summ.
Abstract
Jedną z metod wspomagających podejmowanie decyzji w warunkach złożonego problemu decyzyjnego, który zawiera więcej niż jedno kryterium decyzyjne, jest metoda Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Metoda doczekała się wielu implementacji zarówno komercyjnego, jak i niekomercyjnego oprogramowania komputerowego. Przykładami tego ostatniego, w postaci pakietów ahp oraz AHPmethod, są moduły programu R. W artykule dokonano porównania możliwości obu pakietów, wskazując zalety i wady każdego z rozwiązań. W ocenie m.in. rodzaju, układu oraz poprawności uzyskiwanych wyników w analizie wykorzystano internetowy przykład problemu decyzyjnego.(abstrakt oryginalny)

Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is one of the methods which is used in the analysis of complex decision-making problems where there are more than one decision criterion. The method has been programmed in many commercial and non-commercial software programs. Ahp and AHPmethod packages are examples of implementation of AHP method in non-commercial R program. The paper presents the comparision of both R packages indicating the advantages and disadvantages of each solution. The packages' evaluation includes the type, layout and compatibility of calculation results. The paper presents Tom-Dick-Harry decision-making problem from the Internet.(original abstract)
Accessibility
The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics
The Library of Warsaw School of Economics
The Library of University of Economics in Katowice
The Main Library of Poznań University of Economics and Business
The Main Library of the Wroclaw University of Economics
Full text
Show
Bibliography
Show
  1. Bartłomowicz T., 2015, Pomiar preferencji konsumentów z wykorzystaniem metody Analytic Hierarchy Process, Taksonomia, nr 27, s. 20-29.
  2. Bartłomowicz T., 2016, AHPmethod R package, http://keii.ue.wroc.pl/AHPmethod/.
  3. Chuang P.T., 2001, Combining the Analytic Hierarchy Process and quality function development for a location decision from a requirement perspective, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, no. 18, s. 842-849.
  4. Glur Ch., 2016, Ahp R package, https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ahp/.
  5. Gao S., Zhang Z., Cao C., 2009, New Methods of Estimating Weights in AHP, Proceedings of the ISIP, Huangshan.
  6. Holder R.D., 1990, Some comment on the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Journal of the Operational Research Society, no. 41, s. 1073-1076.
  7. http://yaml.org.
  8. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4180.
  9. McCaffrey J., 2005, Test Run: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, MSDN Magazine.
  10. R Development Core Team, 2011, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, http://cran.r-project.org/.
  11. Saaty T.L., 1977, A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, no. 15, s. 234-281.
  12. Saaty T.L., 1980, The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning. Priority Setting. Resource Allocation, McGraw-Hill, New York International Book Company, New York.
  13. Saaty T.L., 1990, How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 48. 1.
  14. Saaty T.L., 1997, That is not the analytic hierarchy process: what the AHP is and what it is not; Journal of Multi-Criteria decision analysis; John Willey&Sons Ltd.; November 1997, Volume 6, Issue 6, s. 309-363.
  15. Saaty T.L., 2001, Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.
  16. Saaty T.L., 2008, Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making: Why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors, The Analytic Hierarchy/Network Process, Royal Academy of Exact. Physical and Natural Sciences, Series A: Mathematics (RACSAM) 102 (2), s. 251-318.
  17. Saaty T.L., 2010, Economic forecasting with tangible and intangible criteria: the analytic hierarchy process of measurement and its validation, Ekonomski Horizonti 12 (1); s. 5-45.
  18. Saaty T.L., Alexander J.M., 1989, Group Decision Making and The AHP, [w:] Golden B.L., Wasil E.A., Harker P.T., The Analytic Hierarchy Process and Studies, Spirnger-Verlag, Wiesbaden.
  19. Trzaskalik T., 2014, Wielokryterialne wspomaganie decyzji. Przegląd metod i zastosowań, Organizacja i Zarządzanie, nr 74, s. 239-263.
  20. Trzaskalik T. (red.), 2014, Wielokryterialne wspomaganie decyzji. Metody i zastosowania, PWE, Warszawa.
  21. Whitaker R., 2007, Validation examples of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Analytic Network Process, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 46, s. 840-859.
  22. Yuen K.K.F., 2009, On Limitations of the Prioritization Methods in Analytic Hierarchy Process: A Study of Transportation Selection Problems, Proceedings of the IMECS, Hong Kong.
Cited by
Show
ISSN
1507-3858
Language
pol
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/15611/ie.2016.3.01
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu