BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Author
Fliegner Wojciech (Poznań University of Economics and Business)
Title
Analysis of The Business Model Elements and Their Relationships
Analiza elementów modelu biznesowego i ich zależności
Source
Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 2017, nr 474, s. 53-64, rys., bibliogr. 23 poz.
Research Papers of Wrocław University of Economics
Issue title
Global Challenges of Management Control and Reporting
Keyword
Rachunek kosztów, Cykl życia, Modele biznesowe
Cost accounting, Life cycles, Business models
Note
JEL Classification: L25, M10
streszcz., summ.
Abstract
Model biznesowy, który odwzorowuje tworzenie i dostarczanie wartości przez organizację, powinien stanowić podstawę każdego systemu pomiaru dokonań i powinien wyjaśniać, w jaki sposób istotne zmienne niefinansowe i finansowe w systemie pomiaru dokonań są ze sobą powiązane. Ze względu na brak badań w tej dziedzinie, zaproponowano ramy koncepcyjne analizy elementów modelu biznesowego i relacji między nimi. W artykule zaprezentowano również koncepcję cyklu życia modelu biznesowego i controlling jako składową tej koncepcji. Zaproponowano zasobowo-procesowy rachunek kosztów jako metodę analizy modeli biznesowych. Jego składowe (zasoby, działania, produkty/usługi, klienci) są jednocześnie elementami związanymi z szablonem modelu biznesowego (BMC) Osterwaldera(abstrakt oryginalny)

Business model that articulates the economic logic of how an organization creates and delivers value should underlie every performance measurement system and should explain how the important nonfinancial and financial variables in the performance measurement system are related to each other. Due to the lack of research in this area, the conceptual framework for analyzing elements of the business model and relations between them has been proposed. This paper explores also the concept of business model life cycle and controlling as a part of this concept. For analysis of business models this study proposes resource and process consumption accounting (RPCA) method. Its components (resources, activities, products/services, customers) are at the same time elements associated with the Osterwalder's Business Model Canvas (BMC)(original abstract)
Accessibility
The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics
The Library of Warsaw School of Economics
The Library of University of Economics in Katowice
The Main Library of Poznań University of Economics and Business
Full text
Show
Bibliography
Show
  1. Afuah A., 2014, Business Model Innovation: Concepts, Analysis and Cases, Routledge, New York.
  2. Ammar O., Ouakouak M.L., 2015, The business model as a configuration of value: Toward a unified conception, Journal of Business and Management Sciences, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 78-84.
  3. Campbell D., Datar S.M., Kulp S.L., Narayanan V.G., 2015, Testing strategy with multiple performance measures, Journal of Management Accounting Research, vol. 27, no. 2, p. 39-65.
  4. Cavalcante S.A., Kesting P., Ulhøi J.P., 2011, Business model dynamics and innovation: (Re)establishing the missing linkages, Management Decision, vol. 49, no. 8, p. 1327-1342.
  5. CGMA, 2013, CGMA Report: Building Resilience - An Introduction to Business Models, Chartered Global Management Accountant, July 2013.
  6. Chroneer D., Johansson J., Malmstrom M., 2015, Business model management typologies - cognitive
  7. mapping of business model landscapes, International Journal of Business and Management, vol. 10, no. 3, p. 67-80.
  8. Dikolli S.S., Sedatole K.L., 2007, Improvements in the information content of non-financial forward- looking performance measures: A taxonomy and application, Journal of Management Accounting Research, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 71-104.
  9. Hienerth C., Keinz P., Lettl C., 2011, Exploring the nature and implementation process of user-centric business models, Long Range Planning, vol. 44, no. 5/6, p. 344-374.
  10. Ittner C.D., Larcker D.F., 2003, Coming up short on nonfinancial performance measurement, Harvard Business Review, vol. 81, no. 11, p. 88-95.
  11. Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P., 1992, The Balanced Scorecard: Measures That Drive Performance, Harvard Business Review, vol. 70, no. 1, p. 71-79.
  12. Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P., 2004, Strategy Maps, Harvard Business Review Press, Boston.
  13. Keys D.E., van der Merwe A., 2002, The case for resource consumption accounting, Strategic Finance, April, p. 30-36.
  14. Morris M., Schindehutte M., Allen J., 2005, The entrepreneur's business model: Toward a unified perspective, Journal of Business Research, vol. 58, no. 6, p. 726-735.
  15. Müller H., 2002, Prozeßkonforme Grenzplankostenrechnung: Stand, Nutzanwendung, Tendenzen, Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden.
  16. Osterwalder A., 2004, The Business Model Ontology - A Proposition in a Design Science Approach, PhD thesis, Université de Lausanne.
  17. Osterwalder A., Pigneur Y., 2010, Business Model Generation, Wiley, New York.
  18. Osterwalder A., Pigneur Y., Tucci C.L., 2005, Clarifying Business Models: Origins, Present, and Future of the Concept, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 16, p. 1-25.
  19. Pateli A.G., Giaglis G.M., 2004, A research framework for analysing business models, European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 302-314.
  20. Teece D.J., 2010, Business models, business strategy and innovation, Long Range Planning, vol. 43, no. 2/3, p. 172-194.
  21. Wirtz B.W., 2011, Business Model Management: Design - Instruments - Success Factors, Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden.
  22. Zieliński T.M., 2014, Zasobowo procesowy rachunek kosztów, PhD thesis, Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu.
  23. Zott C., Amit R., 2010, Business model design: An activity system perspective, Long Range Planning, vol. 43, no. 2/3, p. 216-226.
Cited by
Show
ISSN
1899-3192
Language
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.15611/pn.2017.474.05
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu