BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Author
Luterek Aleksandra (Uniwersytet Warszawski)
Title
Proces podejmowania decyzji w gospodarstwie domowym a decydowanie w przedsiębiorstwie - podobieństwa i różnice
Decision-Making Process in Households a Decision in the Company - Relationship and Differences
Source
Acta Universitatis Nicolai Copernici. Zarządzanie, 2017, t. 44, nr 2, s. 171-179, bibliogr. 28 poz.
Keyword
Gospodarstwa domowe, Proces podejmowania decyzji, Przedsiębiorstwo
Households, Decision making process, Enterprises
Note
JEL Classification: D1, D7,
streszcz., summ.
Abstract
Podejmowanie decyzji jest nieodłącznym elementem życia każdego człowieka oraz każdej organizacji funkcjonującej na rynku. Codziennie dokonywane są różne wybory, nie zawsze też w sposób świadomy. Literatura wskazuje jak powinien wyglądać proces, który ostatecznie ma nam pomóc w podjęciu decyzji racjonalnej. Jak się jednak okazuje, w zależności od tego kto daną decyzję podejmuje, skutki są zupełnie inne. Niniejsze opracowanie ma na celu porównanie zachowań i sposobów decydowania przez członków gospodarstwa domowego oraz menedżerów przedsiębiorstwa. (abstrakt oryginalny)

Decision-making is an integral part of life of every person and every organization functioning in the market. Different choices are made every day, not always in a conscious way. Literature shows us how a process that will ultimately help us make rational decisions should look like. As it turns out, depending on who makes the decision, the effects are quite different. This study aims to compare the behavior and ways of deciding of households and businesses. (original abstract)
Full text
Show
Bibliography
Show
  1. Blavatskyy P. R., (2007), Stochastic expected utility theory, "Journal of Risk and Uncertainty", 34(3), 259-286.
  2. Bogdanienko J., (2010), Organizacja i zarządzanie w zarysie, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa.
  3. Byun D., (2001), The AHP approach for selecting an automobile purchase model, "Information and Management", 38(5), 289-297.
  4. Chau, P. Y. K., & Hu P. J., (2002), Investigating healthcare professionals' decisions to accept telemedicine technology: An empirical test of competing theories, "Information and Management", 39(4), 297-311.
  5. Closs D. J., Jacobs M. A., Swink M. & Webb G. S., (2008), Toward a theory of competencies for the management of product complexity: Six case studies, "Journal of Operations Management", 26(5), 590-610.
  6. Courtney J. F., (2001), Decision making and knowledge management in inquiring organizations: Toward a new decision-making paradigm for DSS, "Decision Support Systems", 31(1), 17-38.
  7. Cunha M. R., Lambrecht B. M. & Pawlina, G., (2011), Household liquidity and incremental financing decisions: Theory and evidence, "Journal of Business Finance and Accounting", 38(7-8), 1016-1052.
  8. Edum-Fotwe F. T., & McCaffer R., (2000), Developing project management competency: Perspectives from the construction industry, "International Journal of Project Management", 18(2), 111-124.
  9. Gray P. H., (2001), A problem-solving perspective on knowledge management practices, "Decision Support Systems", 31(1), 87-102.
  10. Hruschka H. & Natter M., (1999), Comparing performance of feedforward neural nets and K-means for cluster-based market segmentation, "European Journal of Operational Research", 114(2), 346-353.
  11. Jaafari A., (2001), Management of risks, uncertainties and opportunities on projects: Time for a fundamental shift, "International Journal of Project Management", 19(2), 89-101.
  12. Jaccard M., Loulou R., Kanudia A., Nyboer J., Bailie A. & Labriet M., (2003), Methodological contrasts in costing greenhouse gas abatement policies: Optimization and simulation modeling of micro-economic effects in Canada, "European Journal of Operational Research", 145(1), 148-164.
  13. Jørgensen S. & Zaccour G., (1999), Price subsidies and guaranteed buys of a new technology, "European Journal of Operational Research", 114(2), 338-345.
  14. Kaiser M. J., & Pulsipher A. G., (2004), The design of a dynamic allocation mechanism for the federal energy assistance program LIHEAP, "European Journal of Operational Research", 158(3), 773-792.
  15. Kim Y., Street, W. N. Russell, G. J. & Menczer F., (2005), Customer targeting: A neural network approach guided by genetic algorithms, "Management Science", 51(2), 264-276.
  16. Nordmoe E. D. & Jain D. C., (2000), Drawing inferences from logit models for panel data, "Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry", 16(2), 127-145.
  17. Pennings J. M. E. & Smidts A., (2000), Assessing the construct validity of risk attitude, "Management Science", 46(10), 1337-1348.
  18. Pullman M. E., Verma R. & Goodale J. C., (2001), Service design and operations strategy formulation in multicultural markets, "Journal of Operations Management", 19(2), 239- 254.
  19. Sasic A. & Habib K. N., (2013), Modelling departure time choices by a heteroskedastic generalized logit (het-GenL) model: An investigation on home-based commuting trips in the greater toronto and hamilton area (GTHA), "Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice", 50, 15-32.
  20. Schwanen T. & Ettema D., (2009), Coping with unreliable transportation when collecting children: Examining parents' behavior with cumulative prospect theory, "Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice", 43(5), 511-525.
  21. Schwarz N. & Ernst A., (2009), Agent-based modeling of the diffusion of environmental innovations - an empirical approach, "Technological Forecasting and Social Change", 76(4), 497-511.
  22. Shaw M. J., Subramaniam C., Tan G. W. & Welge M. E., (2001), Knowledge management and data mining for marketing, "Decision Support Systems", 31(1), 127-137.
  23. Subramoniam R., Huisingh D. & Chinnam R. B., (2009), Remanufacturing for the automotive aftermarket-strategic factors: Literature review and future research needs, "Journal of Cleaner Production", 17(13), 1163-1174.
  24. Timmermans H. J. P. & Zhang J., (2009), Modeling household activity travel behavior: Examples of state of the art modeling approaches and research agenda, "Transportation Research Part B: Methodological", 43(2), 187-190.
  25. Tung L. L. & Rieck O., (2005), Adoption of electronic government services among business organizations in Singapore, "Journal of Strategic Information Systems", 14(4), 417-440.
  26. Van der Aalst W. M. P., (2001), Re-engineering knock-out processes, "Decision Support Systems", 30(4), 451-468.
  27. Wong B. K. & Monaco J. A., (1995), Expert system applications in business: A review and analysis of the literature (1977-1993), "Information and Management", 29(3), 141-152.
  28. Zhang J., Kuwano M., Lee B. & Fujiwara A., (2009), Modeling household discrete choice behavior incorporating heterogeneous group decision-making mechanisms, "Transportation Research Part B: Methodological", 43(2), 230-250.
Cited by
Show
ISSN
2450-7040
Language
pol
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/AUNC_ZARZ.2017.028
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu