BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Author
Najda-Janoszka Marta (Jagiellonian University, Poland)
Title
Industry Transition - Challenges for Value Capture
Source
Business and Non-profit Organizations Facing Increased Competition and Growing Customers' Demands, 2017, vol. 16, s. 529-542, tab., bibliogr. 60 poz.
Keyword
Przemysł, Cykl życia, Wartości w biznesie
Industry, Life cycles, Values ​​in business
Note
summ.
Abstract
The transition period in the industry life cycle induces a profound reconfiguration in the competitive landscape. A shift from an early, fluid state to a mature stage generates both strategic threats and opportunities for capturing value by incumbents as well as new entrants. Thus the challenge is to identify early harbingers of that transition in order to formulate an appropriate strategic response allowing for protecting and strengthening captured value streams. Existing gaps regarding causal explanations of industry transformation and the processual nature of value appropriation ignited the discussion presented in the article. The aim of this study is to enhance the understanding of the dynamics of the value capture process by examining the features of industry transition. A thorough review of the theoretical and empirical studies on the subject matter enabled formulation of propositions that refer to the problem of identifying the transition signals and relate the competitive dynamics of the transition period with the value capture practices. (original abstract)
Full text
Show
Bibliography
Show
  1. Abernathy, W.J., & Utterback, J.M. (1978). Patterns of Industrial Innovation. Technology Review, 80(7), 41-47.
  2. Agarwal, R., Sarkar, M. B., & Echambadi, R. (2002). The conditioning effect of time on firm survival: An industry life cycle approach. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 971-994.
  3. Afuah, A. (2014). Business Model Innovation: Concepts, Analysis, and Cases. New York: Routledge.
  4. Aldrich, H. E., & Pfeffer, J. (1976). Environments of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 79-105.
  5. Anderson, P., & Tushman, M. L. (1990). Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 604-633.
  6. Argyres, N., Bigelow, L., & Nickerson, J. (2015). Dominant designs, innovation shocks and the follower's dilemma. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 216-234.
  7. Audretsch, D. B., Houweling, P., & Thurik, A. R. (2004). Industry evolution: diversity, selection and the role of learning. International Small Business Journal, 22, 331-348.
  8. Baldwin, C., & Henkel, J. F. (2015). Modularity and intellectual property protection. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 1637-1655.
  9. Baum, J., Korn, H., & Kotha, S. (1995). Dominant designs and population dynamics in telecommunication services: Founding and failure of facsimile transmission service organizations 1965-1992. Social Science Research, 24, 97-135.
  10. Baum, J. A. C., & Oliver, C. (1991). Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 187-218.
  11. Bigelow, L. S., & Argyres, N. S. (2008). Transaction costs, industry experience and make-or-buy decisions in the population of early U.S. auto firms. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 66, 791-807.
  12. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. (1996), Co-opetition. New York: Doubleday.
  13. Breschi, S., Malerba, F., & Orsenigo, L. (2000). Technological regimes and Schumpeterian patterns of innovation. The Economic Journal, 110, 388-410.
  14. Chesbrough, H. W. (2006) Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  15. Christensen, C. M., Suarez, F. F., & Utterback, J. M. (1998). Strategies for survival in fast-changing industries. Management Science, 44, 207-220.
  16. Coff, R. W. (2010). The co-evolution of rent appropriation and capability development. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 711-733.
  17. Cohen, W. M., & Klepper, S. (1996). Firm Size and the nature of innovation within industries: The case of process and product R&D. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 78, 232-243.
  18. Cusumano, M. A., Kahl, S. J., & Suarez, F. F. (2015). Services, industry evolution, and the competitive strategies of product firms. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 559-575.
  19. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hyper Competition. Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering. New York: The Free Press.
  20. Deans, G., Kroeger, F., & Zeisel, S. (2003). Winning the Merger Endgame: A Playbook for Profiting From Industry Consolidation. New York: McGraw Hill Professional.
  21. Filson, D. (2001). The nature and effects of technological change over the industry life-cycle, Review of Economic Dynamics, 4, 460-494.
  22. Fischer, T. (2011). Managing Value Capture: Empirical Analyses of Managerial Challenges in Capturing Value. Heidelberg: Gabler Verlag - Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH.
  23. Geroski, P. A. (1995). What do we know about entry? International Journal of Industrial Organization,13, 421-440.
  24. Gupta, S., Jain, D. C., & Sawhney, M. S. (1999). Modeling the evolution of markets with indirect network externalities: An application to digital television. Marketing Science, 18, 396-416.
  25. Hannan, M. T., & Carroll, G. R. (1992). Dynamics of Organizational Populations: Density, Competition, and Legitimation. New York: Oxford University Press.
  26. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1989). Organizational Ecology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  27. Helfat, C. E. (2015). Vertical firm structure and industry evolution. Industrial and Corporate Change, 24, 803-818.
  28. Jovanovic, B., & MacDonald, G. M. (1994). The life cycle of a competitive industry. The Journal of Political Economy, 102, 322-347.
  29. Kaa van de, G. Ende van de, J., Vries de, H. J., & Heck van, E. (2011). Factors for winning interface format battles: A review and synthesis of the literature. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78, 1397-1411.
  30. Kapoor, R. (2013). Persistence of integration in the face of specialization: How firms navigated the winds of disintegration and shaped the architecture of the semiconductor industry. Organization Science, 24, 1195-1213.
  31. Katkalo, V. S., Pitelis, Ch., & Teece, D. J. (2010). Introduction: On the nature and scope of dynamic capabilities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19, 1175-1186.
  32. Klepper, S., (1996). Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over the product life cycle. American Economic Review, 86(3), 562-583.
  33. Klepper, S., & Graddy, E. (1990). The evolution of new industries and determinants of market structure. RAND Journal of Economics, 21(1), 27-44.
  34. Klepper, S., & Miller, J. H. (1995). Entry, exit, and shakeouts in the United States in new manufactured products. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13, 567 - 91.
  35. Klepper, S., & Simons, K.L. (2005). Industry shakeouts and technological change. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 23, 23-43.
  36. Malerba, F. (2006). Innovation and the evolution of industries. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 16, 3-23.
  37. Malerba, F., & Orsenigo, L. (1996). The dynamics and evolution of industries. Industrial and Corporate Change, 5, 51-87.
  38. McGahan, A. M., & Silverman, B. (2001). How does innovative activity change as industries mature? International Journal of Industrial Organization, 19, 1141-1160.
  39. Miles, G., Snow, C.C., & Sharfman, M. P. (1993). Industry variety and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 163-177.
  40. Murmann, J. P., & Frenken, K. (2006). Toward a systematic framework for research on dominant designs, technological innovations, and industrial change. Research Policy, 35, 925-952.
  41. Najda-Janoszka, M. (2016a). Dynamic perspective of value appropriation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 230, 14-21.
  42. Najda-Janoszka, M. (2016b). Responding to discontinuities - alternating action patterns of value appropriation. In A. Zbuchaea, C. Bratianu, F. Pinzaru & R.D. Leon (Eds.) Strategica 2016: Opportunities and Risks in the Contemporary Business Environment (pp. 483-494). Bucharest: Tritonic.
  43. Najda-Janoszka, M. (2016c). Dynamic capability-based approach to value appropriation. Krakow: Jagiellonian University Press.
  44. Najda-Janoszka, M. (2012). Matching imitative activity of high-tech firms with entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 8, 52-67.
  45. Peltoniemi, M. (2011). Reviewing industry life-cycle theory: Avenues for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13, 349-375.
  46. Pitelis, Ch. N. (2009). The co-evolution of organizational value capture, value creation and sustainable advantage. Organization Studies, 30, 1115-1139.
  47. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy. New York: Free Press.
  48. Riegman, T., & Vries, H. J. de (2013). Establishing a dynamic model for factors favouring multiple designs. In B. Sandalski, M. Vicheva & R. Dimitrova (Eds.), Standardization and Related Activities - A Means of International and Balkan Collaboration (pp. 39-49). Sofia, Bulgaria: Publishing House of Technical University of Sofia.
  49. Rothaermel, F. T., & Hess, A. M. (2007). Building dynamic capabilities: Innovation driver by individual, Firm, and network level effects. Organization Science, 18, 898- 921.
  50. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. In R. Lamb (Ed.) Competitive Strategic Management (pp. 556-570.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  51. Srinivasan, R., Lilien, G. L., & Rangaswamy, A. (2006). The emergence of dominant designs. Journal of Marketing, 70, 1-17.
  52. Stigler, G. J. (1951). The division of labor is limited by the extent of the market. The Journal of Political Economy, 59(3), 185-193.
  53. Suarez, F. F. (2004). Battles for technological dominance: an integrative framework. Research Policy, 33, 271-286.
  54. Suarez, F. F., Grodal, S., & Gotsopoulos, A. (2015), Perfect timing? Dominant category, dominant design, and the window of opportunity for firm entry. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 437-448.
  55. Suarez, F. F., & Utterback, J. M.( 1995). Dominant designs and the survival of firms. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 415-430.
  56. Teece, D. J., (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15, 285-305.
  57. Utterback, J. M., & Abernathy, W. J. (1975). A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega, 3, 639-656.
  58. Vries, H. J. de, Ruijter, J. P. M. de., & Argam, N. (2011). Dominant design or multiple designs: The flash memory card case. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 21, 263-276.
  59. Wade, J. (1995). Dynamics of organizational communities and technological bandwagons - an empirical-investigation of community evolution in the microprocessor market. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 111-133.
  60. Weck de, O., Eckert, C., & Clarkson, J. P. (2007). Classification of Uncertainty for early Product and System Design. Paris: ICED.
Cited by
Show
ISSN
2543-540X
Language
eng
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu