BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Niklewicz-Pijaczyńska Małgorzata (University of Wroclaw, Poland)
Patent Activity of Companies Located in Wroclaw Technology Park
Business and Non-profit Organizations Facing Increased Competition and Growing Customers' Demands, 2017, vol. 16, s. 543-552, tab., bibliogr. 31 poz.
Patenty, Park nauki i technologii, Innowacje, Prawo własności przemysłowej
Patent, Science and Technology Park, Innovations, Industrial property law
The article addresses the issue of patent activity of enterprises concentrated in the structure of technology park. The purpose of this publication was to determine whether the status of a technology park tenant activates the inventive activity of enterprises and the degree of internal absorption of knowledge, which is measured by patent applications filed with the Polish Patent Office. The scope of the research covered the Wroclaw Technology Park and its business area. The subject scope covered patent applications of one hundred and sixty companies from the Wroclaw Technology Park and for quantitative and qualitative analysis of inventive activity, they used methods characteristic for the so-called patent statistics. Conclusions from the research indicate that in the analyzed period inventive activity of enterprises located in the Wroclaw Technology Park had an individual character and was based primarily on external sources, not on knowledge sources from the network. (original abstract)
Full text
  1. Alaei, A. (2004). Planning for the establishment of science and technology parks. Journal of Rooyesh, 65, 34-49.
  2. Appold, S. J. (2004). Research parks and the location of industrial research laboratories: An analysis of the effectiveness of a policy intervention. Research Policy, 33(2), 225-243.
  3. Audretsch, D., & Feldman, M. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. The American Economic Review, 86(3), 630-640.
  4. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management,17(1), 99-120.
  5. Blyler, M., & Coff, R. W. (2003). Dynamic capabilities, social capital, and rent appropriation: Ties that split pies. Strategic Management Journal, 24(7), 677-686.
  6. Bulsara, H. P., Gandhi, S., & Porey, P. D. (2010). Commercialization of technology innovations and patents: Issues and challenges. Asia-Pacific Tech Monitor, 27, 12-18.
  7. Colombo, M. G., & Delmastro, M. (2002). How effective are technology incubators? Research Policy,31(7), 1103-1122.
  8. Edwards, T., & Jones, O. (2008). Failed institution building: Understanding the interplay between agency, social skill and context. Scandinavian Journal of Management,24(1), 44-54.
  9. Edquist, C. (2002). The systems of innovation approach and innovation policy: An account of the state of the art. GeoJournal, 53, 29-38.
  10. Etzkowitz, H. (2017). Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation in Action. Oxford: Routledge.
  11. Fukugawa, N. (2006). Science parks in Japan and their value-added contributions to new technology-based firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24(2), 381-400.
  12. Hansson, F., Husted, K., & Vestergaard, J. (2005). Second generation science parks: From structural holes jockeys to social capital catalysts of the knowledge society. Technovation, 25(9), 1039-1049.
  13. Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577-598.
  14. Jimenez-Moreno, J. J., Martinez-Canas, R., Ruiz-Palomino, P., & Saez-Martinez, F. J. (2013). The role of science and technology parks in the generation of firm level social capital through university-firm relations: An empirical study in Spain. In J.J.M. Ferreira, M. Raposo, R. Rutten & A. Varga (Eds.), Cooperation, Clusters and Knowledge Transfer. Universities and Firms Towards Regional Competitiveness. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  15. Klincewicz, K. (2008). Polska Innowacyjność : Analiza Bibliometryczna. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarzą dzania Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
  16. Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2003). U.S. science parks: The diffusion of an innovation and its effects on the academic missions of universities. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(9), 1323-1356.
  17. Lofsten, H., & Lindelof, P. (2001). Science parks in Sweden - industrial renewal and development? R & D Management, 31(3), 309-322.
  18. Lindelöf, P., & Löfsten, H. (2002). Growth, management and financing of new technology-based firms-assessing value-added contributions of firms located on and off Science Parks. Omega, 30(3), 143-154.
  19. Löfsten, H., & Lindelöf, P. (2002). Science Parks and the growth of new technology-based firms-academic-industry links, innovation and markets. Research Policy, 31(6), 859-876.
  20. Monck, C. S. (1988). Science Parks and the Growth of High Technology Firms. London: Croom Helm.
  21. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
  22. Niklewicz-Pijaczyńka, M. (2015). Rola systemu patentowego w dyfuzji wiedzy. Studia Ekonomiczne, Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, 214, 242-252.
  23. Park, S., Lee, J., & Kim, T. (2001). Learning by doing and spillovers: an empirical study on the TFT-LCD industry. IEMC 03 Proceedings. Managing Technologically Driven Organizations: The Human Side of Innovation and Change.
  24. Phillimore, J. (1999). Beyond the linear view of innovation in science park evaluation. An analysis of Western Australian Technology Park. Technovation, 19(11), 673-680.
  25. Siegel, D. S., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2003). Assessing the impact of university science parks on research productivity: Exploratory firm-level evidence from the United Kingdom. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(9), 1357-1369.
  26. Wachowska, M., & Niklewicz-Pijaczyńka, M. (2015). Potencjał rynkowy patentów akademickich: analiza "martwych" patentów. Nierówności Społeczne a Wzrost Gospodarczy, 41, 448-460.
  27. Westlund, H. (2008). Social capital in the knowledge economy: Theory and empirics. Journal of Regional Science, 48(3), 675-677.
  28. Velho, L., & Saenz, T. (2002). Regional innovation strategies in the knowledge-based economy. Public and private R&D in Brazil: Complements or substitutes? Discussion Paper, 8.
  29. Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464-476.
  30. Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E., & Sapienza, H. J. (2001). Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 587-613.
  31. Vilà, P.C., & Pagès, J.L. (2008). Science and technology parks. Creating new environments favourable to innovation. Paradigmes, 5, 141-149.
Cited by
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu