BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Heidari-Shahreza Mohammad Ali (Islamic Azad University, Shahreza, Isfahan, Iran)
The Effect of Semantic Clustering on the Acquisition of Quantitative and Qualitative Knowledge of Vocabulary
International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (ILSHS), 2015, vol. 50, s. 1-12, rys., bibliogr. 32 poz.
Nauczanie języków obcych, Edukacja
Foreign language teaching, Education
The present study explored the effects of semantic clustering on the acquisition of vocabulary knowledge. Two methods of vocabulary presentation (and instruction) were taken into account: a) Semantically-related presentation (SRP) which was based on the idea of presenting words in semantic clusters; and b) Semantically-unrelated presentation (SUP) which referred to presenting target words in unrelated sets. The results showed that the learners in the SRP class significantly outperformed their peers in the SUP class in both quantitative and qualitative measures of vocabulary knowledge.In-depth analysis of participants' score variations across levels of vocabulary knowledge also revealed that the SRP method of vocabulary presentation was probably a better facilitator in the learners' progress from a basic familiarity with the target words, to vocabulary knowledge at both reception and production level.The findings of the study are fully discussed and its pedagogical implications for language teachers are drawn upon.(original abstract)
Full text
  1. Anderson, J.R. (1995).Cognitive Psychology and its Implications.New York: W.H. Freeman, 4th ed.
  2. Ang, I. (2014). Rethinking the role of context and definition in second language vocabulary acquisition (SLVA): An assimilation via a cognitive model of concept formation. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 3(1), 33-50.
  3. Baddeley, A. D. (1990). Human Memory Theory and Practice.Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
  4. Balota, D.A., & R.F. Lorch. (1986). Depth of automatic spreading activation: Mediated priming effects in pronunciation but not in lexical decision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 336-45.
  5. Choo, L.B., Lin, D.T.A., &Pandian, A. (2012). Language learning approaches: A review of research on explicit and implicit learning in vocabulary acquisition. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55, 852-860. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.572
  6. Craik, F.I.M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research.Journal of verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-84.
  7. Erten, I. H., &Tekin, M. (2008). Effects on vocabulary acquisition of presenting new words in semantic sets versus semantically unrelated sets.System 36 (3), 407-422.
  8. Finkbeiner, M., &Nicol, J. (2003). Semantic category effects in second language word learning. Appl. Psycholinguistics 24 (3), 283-369.
  9. Hashemi, M., &Gowdasiaei, F. (2005). An attribute-treatment interaction study: lexicalset versus semantically-unrelated vocabulary instruction. RELC Journal, 36, 341-361.
  10. Heidari-Shahreza, M. A., &Tavakoli, M. (2012).The effects of repetition and L1 lexicalization on incidental vocabulary acquisition by Iranian EFL Learners. The Language Learning Journal, 40, 1-16. doi:10.1080/09571736.2012.708051
  11. Heidari-Shahreza, M. A., Moinzadeh, A., Barati, H. (2014a).The effect of exposure frequency on incidental vocabulary acquisition. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 14 (1), 43-55.
  12. Heidari-Shahreza, M. A., Moinzadeh, A., Barati, H. (2014b).A comparative investigation into effects of L1 lexicalization and cultural loadedness on incidental vocabulary acquisition and retention. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 3(5), 83-96.
  13. Heidari-Shahreza, M. A. (2014). The development of productive knowledge of vocabulary through implicit exposure: Non-lexicalized words in focus. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research (JALLR), 1 (1), 1-11.
  14. Hoshino, Y.(2010). The categorical facilitation effects on L2 vocabulary learning in a classroom setting. RELC Journal, 41, 301e312.
  15. Hunt, R. R., & Elliot, J. M. (1980). The role of nonsemantic information in memory: orthographic distinctiveness effects on retention. Journal ofExperimental Psychology: General, 109, 49-74.
  16. Keiffer, M. J., &Lesaux, N.K. (2012). Knowledge of words, knowledge about words: Dimensions of vocabulary in first and second language learners in sixth grade. Reading and Writing 25, 347-373.Doi: 10.1007/s11145-010-9272-9
  17. Lehrer, A. (1974). Semantic Fields and Lexical Structure.North-Holland, Amsterdam.
  18. Min, H-T. (2008). EFL vocabulary acquisition and retention: reading plus vocabulary enhancement activities and narrow reading. Language Learning, 58(1), 73-115.
  19. Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  20. Nation, I.S.P., 2000. Learning vocabulary in lexical sets: dangers and guidelines. TESOL J. 9 (2), 6-10.
  21. Nation, I. S. P. (2013). Vocabulary acquisition in second language acquisition. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. doi: 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1265
  22. Nida, E.A. (1975). Componential analysis of meaning: an introduction to semantic structures. Mouton, The Hague.
  23. Papathanasiou, E. (2009). An investigation of two ways of presenting vocabulary.ELT Journal, 63 (4), 313-322.
  24. Rott, S. (2013). Incidental vocabulary acquisition. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. doi: 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0531
  25. Schneider, V., Healy, A., & Bourne, L.(2002). What is learned under difficult conditions is hard to forget: contextual interference effects in foreign vocabulary acquisition, retention, and transfer. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 419-440.
  26. Stoller, F., &Grabe, W.(1995). Implications for L2 vocabulary acquisition and instruction from L1 vocabulary research. In: Huckin, T., Haynes, M., Coady, J. (Eds.), Second Language Reading and Vocabulary Learning. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJ, pp. 24-45.
  27. Tinkham, T.(1993). The effect of semantic clustering on the learning of second language vocabulary.System 21 (3), 371-380.
  28. Tinkham, T.(1997). The effects of semantic and thematic clustering on the learning of a second language vocabulary.Second Language Research, 13 (2),138-163.
  29. Waring, R.(1997). The negative effects of learning words in semantic sets: a replication. System, 25 (2), 174-261.
  30. Webb, S. (2007). The effects of repetition on vocabulary knowledge.Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 46-65.
  31. Webb, S. (2013). Depth of vocabulary knowledge. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. doi: 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1325
  32. Wilcox, A. & Medina, A. (2013). Effects of semantic and phonological clustering on L2 vocabulary acquisition among novice learners.System 41, 1056-1069
Cited by
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu