BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Akhter Adnan (Lecturer, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan), Butt Shahzad (Lecturer-Bahria University, Islamabad, Pakistan), Chaudhary Shumaila (Graduates- PMAS-Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan), Kiyani Junaid (Graduates- PMAS-Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan)
Neglected Firm Effect and Stylized Equity Returns: Evidence from Pakistan
International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (ILSHS), 2015, vol. 50, s. 100-106, tab., bibliogr. 18 poz.
Akcje, Rynek akcji, Giełda
Shares, Equity market, Stock exchange
The neglected stock effect is the phenomenon where less researched stock earns more return than that predicted by the traditional CAPM. The aim of this study is to reveal the bonding between neglected stock premium and equity returns in the stock market of Pakistan by using Fama and French (1992 & 1993) methodology. This study is unique with respect to Pakistan that checks the relationship among neglected stock premium and equity returns on a sample of 200 stocks listed the largest stock market of Pakistan KSE. It is corroborated that neglected firm effect is present in market and priced by the market. This manifests that those stocks which are neglected, less researched and got less analyst coverage earn higher return in comparison to popular stocks that got more analyst coverage. The results also revealed that two factor model has greater explanatory power in comparison to Traditional CAPM. The results of this study are in line with the findings of Arbel and Strebel (1980) and Bertin, Michayluk and Prather (2008) for the USA equity market. Lower research analyst coverage increases the uncertainty for investor that how the company will perform in the future, which ultimately increase the risk factor and so the demand of return from the investors. The decision makers must consider this anomaly while making decisions regarding financing, investing etc. This study will facilitate the investors in taking effective investment decision and for efficient resource allocation.(original abstract)
Full text
  1. Akkoc S., Kayali M.M and Ulukoy M. The neglected firm effect and an application in Istanbul Stock Exchange. Banks and Bank Systems, vol 4(3).pp. 53-58, 2009.
  2. Arbel A. and Strebel P. (1982). The Neglected and Small Firm Effects. The Financial Review, vol 17(4), pp. 201-218, 1982.
  3. Bertin, J.W., Michayluk, P., & Prather, L. Liquidity issues surrounding neglected firm. Investment management and financial innovation ,vol 5,pp. 57-65, 2008.
  4. Bjerring J.H, Lakonishok J, and Vermaelen T. Stock Prices and Financial Analysts' Recommendations. The Journal of Finance, vol 38 (1), pp. 187-204, 1983.
  5. Black, F., Jensen, M. C., & Scholes, M. The capital asset pricing model: Some empirical test. New York pragear, pp. 79-121, 1972.
  6. Chen, N., Roll, R., & Ross, R.S. Economic Forces and stock market. Journal of Business, vol 59(3), pp. 383-403, 1986.
  7. Demiroglu and Ryngaert. The First Analyst Coverage of Neglected Stocks. Financial Managemen, pp. 555 - 584, 2010.
  8. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. The cross section of expected stock return. Journal of Finance, vol 47(2), pp. 427-465, 1992.
  9. Fama, F.E & Macbeth, J.D. Risk, return and equilibrium:Empirical results. The journal of political economy, vol 81(3), pp. 607-636, 1973.
  10. Fama.(1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and capital work. Journal of Finance,vol 25(2), pp. 383-417, 1970.
  11. Lee H.W, Sharma V, Cai K. N. Are stocks dumped or neglected by analysts' inferior investments to covered stocks? Journal of Business Research vol 64, pp. 501-507, 2010.
  12. Lintner, J. The valuation of risky assets and the selection of risky investment in stock portfolio and capital budgets. The review of economics and stats, vol 47, pp. 13-37, 1965a.
  13. Lintner, J. Securities prices, risk and maximal gain from diversification. The journal of finance, vol 20(4), pp. 587-615, 1965b.
  14. Mossin, J. Equilibrium in capital markets. Econometricia,vol 34(4), pp. 768-783, 1966.
  15. Ross., S. The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing. Journal of economic theory, vol 13(3), pp. 341-360, 1976.
  16. Sharpe, W.F.Capital asset pricing: A theory of market equilibrium under condition of risk. The journal of finance, vol 19(3), pp. 425-442, 1964.
  17. Treynor, J.L.Toward a theory of market value and risky assets. London risk books, pp. 15- 22, 1962.
  18. Womack K.L. Do Brokerage Analysts' Recommendations Have Investment Value? The journal of finance, vol 51(1), pp. 137-167, 1996.
Cited by
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu