BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Author
Gliszczyńska-Grabias Aleksandra (Institute of Legal Studies of Polish Academy of Sciences), Śledzińska-Simon Anna (University of Wrocław, Poland)
Title
Victimhood of the Nation as a Legally Protected Value in Transitional States - Poland as a Case Study
Source
Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics, 2016, vol. 6, nr 2, s. 45-61, bibliogr. 30 poz.
Keyword
Prawo karne, Tożsamość narodowa
Criminal Law, National identity
Note
summ.
Abstract
The memory of the past is always vital for building national identity in transitional contexts. Yet, the preservation of a particular representation of the national history may lead not only to distortion of the self-identification process, but also to distortion of rights protection. Taking Poland as a case study, we aim to explain mechanisms of using criminal laws for historical assessment and show instances when victimhood became a legally protected value used to justify limitations of free speech and academic research. We argue that the law criminalising defamation of the Polish Nation, and also the decision of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal, were symptoms of frustration and fear against opening and engaging in an honest public debate on recent history, which is necessary for establishing not only the fundamentals of transitional justice, but more importantly, for building mutual trust in a democratic society.(original abstract)
Full text
Show
Bibliography
Show
  1. Belavusau U, Freedom of Speech. Importing European and US Constitutional Models in Transitional Democracies (Routledge 2013).
  2. Benjamin W, One-Way Street and Other Writings (New Left Books 1979).
  3. Engelking B, Leociak J, Warsaw Ghetto. The Guide through the Perished City (Yale University Press 2009).
  4. Grabowski J, Rescue for Money: 'Paid Helpers' in Poland, 1939-1945 (Search and Research Series 2008).
  5. Gross JT, Strach. Antysemityzm tuż po wojnie. Historia moralnej zapaści (Znak 2008).
  6. Kardas P, Kodeks karny. Część szczególna. Komentarz (Wydawnictwo C.H.Beck 2002).
  7. Mill JS, On Liberty (1859).
  8. Milton J, Areopagitica (1644).
  9. Rémond R, History and the Law (Études no. 4046, 2006).
  10. Rosenfeld M, The Identity of the Constitutional Subject: Selfhood, Citizenship, Culture and Community (Routledge 2010).
  11. Sadurski W, Liberał po przejściach (Sens 2007).
  12. Sadurski W, Rights Before Courts: A Study of Constitutional Courts in Postcommunist States of Central and Eastern Europe (Springer 2014, 2nd ed.).
  13. Sweeney JA, The European Court of Human Rights in the Post-Cold War Era. Universality in Transition (Routledge 2013).
  14. Bachmann K, 'The Polish Paradox: Transition from and To Democracy' in N Wouters (ed), Transitional Justice and Memory in Europe (1945-2013) (Intersentia 2014).
  15. Holc JP, 'Memory Contested: Jewish and Catholic Views of Auschwitz in Present-Day Poland' in R Blobaum (ed), Antisemitism and its Opponents in Modern Poland (Cornell University Press 2005).
  16. Gliszczyńska-Grabias A, 'Penalizing Holocaust Denial - a View from Europe' in Small ChA (ed), Global Antisemitism - A Crisis of Modernity (Brill 2013).
  17. Sadurski W, 'Transitional Constitutionalism: Simplistic and Fancy Theories' in A Czarnota, M Krygier and W Sadurski (eds), Rethinking the Rule of Law after Communism (CEU Press 2005).
  18. Scheppele KL, 'Constitutional Interpretation after Regimes of Horror' in S Karstedt (ed) Legal Institutions and Collective Memories (Hart Publishing 2009).
  19. Skapska G, 'Restitutive Justice, Rule of Law and Constitutional Dilemmas' in A Czarnota, M Krygier & W Sadurski (eds), Rethinking the Rule of Law after Communism (CEU Press 2005).
  20. Uitz R, 'The Incomplete Transition in Hungary' in N Wouters (ed), Transitional Justice and Memory in Europe (1945-2013) (Intersentia 2014).
  21. Druliolle V, 'Democracy Captured by its Imaginary: The Transition as Memory and Discourses of Constitutionalism in Spain' (2008) 17 "Social and Legal Studies".
  22. Gliszczyńska-Grabias A, 'Stalinism and Communism equals or versus Nazism? Central and Eastern European Unwholesome Legacy in ECtHR' (2016) 30.1 "East European Politics and Societies".
  23. Kamiński IC, 'Kontrowersje prawne wokół przestępstwa polegającego na pomawianiu narodu o popełnienie zbrodni' (2010) VIII "Problemy Współczesnego Prawa Międzynarodowego, Europejskiego i Porównawczego".
  24. Krygier M, Lifting the Burden of the Past, keynote address for symposium Why Poland? Facing the Demons of Polish-Jewish History, Melbourne, Australia, 28 November 2012.
  25. Michnik A, 'Żydowski problem z pamięcią (Jewish problem with the memory)' "Gazeta Wyborcza", Warszawa, 28 April 2013.
  26. Woiński M, 'Przestępstwo tzw. pomówienia Narodu Polskiego (de lege derogata)' (2009) no. 2 "Państwo i Prawo".
  27. Appeal B, 'Liberté pour l'Histoire', accessed 16 December 2014.
  28. Kamiński IC, case comment available at: last accessed 16 December 2014.
  29. Stofleth DE, 'Memory Politics in Spain: The Law of Historical Memory and the Politics of the Dead', available at International Association of Genocide Scholars database accessed 16 December 2014.
  30. 'UN position on the Spanish Amnesty Law', available at accessed 16 December 2014.
Cited by
Show
ISSN
2084-1264
2084-1264
Language
eng
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu