- Author
- Bartczak Monika (Toruń High School of Banking, Poland)
- Title
- The Right to Privacy in the Legal System of the United States
- Source
- Torun International Studies, 2013, nr 1(6), s. 5-12, bibliogr. 24 poz.
- Keyword
- Ochrona prywatności, Prawo zwyczajowe, Prawa człowieka, Ochrona dóbr osobistych, Prawo do prywatności
Protection of privacy, Common law, Human rights, Protection of personal goods, Right to privacy - Note
- summ.
- Country
- Stany Zjednoczone Ameryki
United States of America (USA) - Abstract
- The article presents a historical aspect of development of the right to privacy in the American legal system. The considerations bring closer the most significant issues concerning the privacy protection presented among U.S. case-law and doctrine. (original abstract)
- Full text
- Show
- Bibliography
-
- Bloustein, E.J., (1964), Privacy as an Aspect of Human Dignity: An Answear to Dean Prosser, University Law Review, 1964, vol. 39.
- Chadwick, P., (2006), "The Value of Privacy", European Human Right Law, issue 5.
- Cooley, T., (1906), Treatise on the Law of Torts: wrongs which arise indepedently of contracts", Third Edition by John Lewis, Callaghan and Company.
- Henkin, L, (1974), Privacy and autonomy, Columbia Law Review, 1974, vol. 74.
- Kalven Jr, H.,(1966) Privacy in Tort law - were Warren and Brandeis wrong?, Law & Contemp Probs., vol. 31.
- Mednis, A., (2006), Prawo do prywatności osób publicznych, Zakamycze.
- Motyka, K., (2010), Prawo do prywatności, Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Podlaskiej w Siedlcach, No 85.
- Prosser, W.L., (1960), Privacy, California Law Review 1960, vol.48, No 3.
- Post, R.C., (1991), "Rereading Warren and Brandeis: Privacy, Property, and Appropriation", Yale Law School Faculty Scholarship Series, Paper 206.
- Rubenfeld, J., (1989), Right to Privacy, Harvard Law Review, vol. 4.
- Sieńczyło-Chlabicz, J., (2006), Naruszenie prawa do prywatności osób publicznych przez prasę. Analiza cywilnoprawna, Zakamycze.
- Warren, S.D. & Brandeis, L.D., (1890), The Right to Privacy, Harvard Law Review, Vol. IV, No. 5.
- Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438, U.S. Supreme Court, March 22, 1972.
- Goodridge v. Department of Public Health, 798 N.E. 2d, Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, November 18, 2003.
- Griswold v. Connecticut 381 U.S. 479, U.S. Supreme Court, June 7, 1965.
- In Re Quinlan, 70 N.J. 10, New Jersey Court of Appeal, March 31,1976.
- McIver v. Krischer, 697 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 1997).
- Pavesich v. New England Life Insurance Co.50 SE 68 Supreme Court of Georgia, March 3, 1905.
- Roberson v. Rochester Folding Ford Company 171 NY 538, 64 N.E.442 New York Court of Appeals, June 27, 1902.
- Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, U.S. Supreme Court, January 22, 1973.
- Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557, U.S. Supreme Court, April 7, 1969.
- Abernethy v.Hutchinson [1825] 3 L.J.Ch. 209.
- Prince Albert v Strange [1849] EWHC Ch. J20.
- Yovatt v. Winyard [1820].
- Cited by
- ISSN
- 2391-7601
- Language
- eng
- URI / DOI
- http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/TIS.2013.001
