BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Author
Getahun Saleamlak Fentaw (Haramaya University, Ethiopia)
Title
Review of Inclusive Growth and other Alternatives to Confront Authoritarian Populism
Source
Zeszyty Naukowe SGGW w Warszawie. Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, 2017, t. 17(32), z. 4, s. 78-84, bibliogr. 26 poz.
Scientific Journal Warsaw University of Life Sciences SGGW - Problems of Word Agriculture
Keyword
Populizm, Nierówności społeczne, Obszary wiejskie
Populism, Social inequality, Rural areas
Note
streszcz., summ.
Abstract
Our world has gone through myriad forms of administrative and economic ideological eras, some of which helped positively and others contributed regressively. Recently, the rise of authoritarian populism as an alternative path to mainstream democracy stems from the failure of inclusiveness in the political and economic institutions especially in the rural world. Due to extractive capitalism, nowadays, rural areas are characterized by persistent poverty, deep inequalities, marginalization and exclusion, fractured identities and loss of self-esteem, which in turn engenders a regressive politics dubbed 'authoritarian populism'. It endangers our future unless we confront it and it has gained momentum by winning national elections in some countries. Alternatively, inclusive growth that would successfully share benefits to the rural people via inclusive political and economic institutions could be able to transform the rural poor. Endorsing and supporting this option with emancipatory rural politics, therefore, saves globalization from a looming collapse and ultimately culminates the world to a new level of civilization. (original abstract)
Full text
Show
Bibliography
Show
  1. Badiou, A. (2016). Twenty-four notes on the uses of the word "people". In What is a people?, eds. A. Badiou, P. Bourdieu, J. Butler, G. Didi-Huberman, S. Khiari, J. Rancičre, 21-31. New York: Columbia University Press.
  2. Biehl, J., Bookchin, M. (1998). The politics of social ecology: Libertarian municipalism. Montreal: Black Rose Books
  3. Conde, M., Le Billon, P. (2017). Why do some communities resist mining projects while others do not? The Extractive Industries and Society. Accessed 30 May 2017 from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2214790X17300035.
  4. De Haan, A. (2014). The rise of social protection in development: progress, pitfalls and politics. The European Journal of Development Research, 26(3), 311-321.
  5. Edelman, M. (2003). Transnational peasant and farmer movements and networks. In Global civil society 2003, eds. M. Kaldor, H. Anheier, M. Glasius, 185-200. London: Oxford University Press.
  6. Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25/26, 56-80.
  7. Fraser, N. (2017). The end of progressive neoliberalism. Dissent, 64(2), 130-134.
  8. Gusterson, H. (2017). From Brexit to Trump: Anthropology and the rise of nationalist populism. American Ethnologist, 44(2), 209-214.
  9. Hall, R., Kepe, T. (2017). Elite capture and state neglect: New evidence on South Africa's land reform. Review of African Political Economy, 44: 122-130.
  10. Hall, S. (1985). Authoritarian populism: A reply to Jessop et al. New Left Review, 151, 115-124.
  11. Hall, S. (1980). Popular-democratic versus authoritarian populism. In Marxism and democracy, ed. A. Hunt, 157-187. London: Laurence and Wishart.
  12. Hasan, N. (2016). Violent activism, Islamist ideology, and the conquest of public space among youth in Indonesia. In Youth identities and social transformations in modern Indonesia, ed. K. Robinson, 200-213. Leiden, Brill.
  13. Heinö, A.J. (2016). Timbro Authoritarian Populism Index 2016.
  14. Scoones, I., Edelman, M., Borras, S.M. Jr., Hall, R., Wolford, W., White, B. (2017). Emancipatory rural politics: confronting authoritarian populism. The Journal of Peasant Studies, DOI: 10.1080/03066150.2017.1339693
  15. Levitsky, S., Way, L. (2010). Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the Cold War.
  16. Inglehart, R. Norris, P. (2017). Trump and the Xenophobic Populist Parties: The Silent Revolution in Reverse. Perspectives in Politics, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592717000111.
  17. Li, T.M. (2010). To make live or let die? Rural dispossession and the protection of surplus populations. Antipode, 41(1), 66-93.
  18. Monnat, S. (2016). Deaths of despair and support for Trump in the 2016 presidential election. The Pennsylvania State University Department of Agricultural Economics, Sociology, and Education Research Brief - 12/04/16. Accessed 30 May 2017 from: http://aese.psu.edu/directory/smm67/Election16.pdf.
  19. Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge University Press.
  20. Rancičre, J. (2016). The populism that is not to be found. In: What is a people?, ed. A. Badiou, New York, Columbia University Press.
  21. Robinson, J.A., Acemoglu, D. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity and poverty. Crown Business, New York.
  22. Rooduijn, M. (2014). Vox populismus: a populist radical right attitude among the public? Nations and Nationalism, 20(1), 80-92.
  23. Sanders, D., Scotto, T., Reifler, J. (2016). The Consequences of Authoritarian Populism in Britain.
  24. Svampa, M. (2015). Commodities consensus: Neo-extractivism and enclosure of the commons in Latin America. South Atlantic Quarterly, 114(1), 65-82.
  25. Veltmeyer, H., Petras, J. (2014). The new extractivism: A post-neoliberal development model or imperialism of the 21st century? London: Zed Books.
  26. Wolford, W. (2016). State-society dynamics in contemporary Brazilian land reform. Latin American Perspectives, 43(2), 77-95.
Cited by
Show
ISSN
2081-6960
Language
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.22630/PRS.2017.17.4.83
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu