BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Nawrocki Tomasz L. (Silesian University of Technology)
Opportunities and Threats Associated with an Investment in Shares of Innovative Companies - Evidence from Polish Capital Market
Oeconomia Copernicana, 2018, vol. 9, nr 2, s. 225-244, aneks, bibliogr. 35 poz.
Przedsiębiorstwo innowacyjne, Innowacyjność przedsiębiorstw, Inwestycje, Inwestycje przedsiębiorstw
Innovative enterprises, Enterprise innovation, Investment, Enterprises investments
JEL Classification: G11, M13, O16, O33
This work was supported by BK212/ROZ1/2017 (13/010/BK_17/0026).
Research background: Since the Internet bubble, which took place at the turn of XX and XXI century, on the global capital markets, including Poland, one may note a growing interest in companies focusing on innovations and innovativeness. The main driver of this interest is the belief that in a longer term innovations and expenditures on research and development will translate into an increase in competitive advantage, financial results, and subsequently also the market value of companies. On the other hand, the attention should also be paid to the fact that innovative activity has also another, darker, side, which is identified with the far-reaching uncertainty about its final effects and the possibility of incurring losses, especially in financial dimension. At the same time, it should be noted that implementation of investment strategy regarding the shares of innovative companies is quite troublesome because of the lack of unified methodology for assessing corporate innovativeness and large information diversity in this area.
Purpose of the article: The investment efficiency analysis of investment strategy regarding shares of companies perceived to be innovative with simultaneous focusing on the different cases of situation development in time.
Methods: The research was carried out for companies listed on the main market of the Warsaw Stock Exchange, taking into consideration various time ranges of investment. The efficiency analysis of this investment strategy was conducted in the risk-return outlay with the use of such measures as: accumulated rate of return, arithmetic average rate of return, standard and semi-standard deviation, as well as coefficients of variation and semi-variation of rate of return and their inverses.
Findings & Value added: The obtained results show that in shorter periods of time, investors buy expectations connected with innovative companies and therefore, the efficiency of investment in their shares is relatively high, but in the longer term expectations are revised by companies' financial results, which in turn often negatively affects the investment efficiency. (original abstract)
Full text
  1. Artz K.W., Norman P.M., Hatfield D.E., & Cardinal L.B. (2010). A longitudinal study of the impact of R&D, patents, and product innovation on firm performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(5). doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00747.x.
  2. Ballardini F., Malipiero A., Oriani R., Sobrero M., & Zammit A. (2005). Do stock markets value innovation? A meta-analysis. SSRN. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.717562.
  3. Damodaran A., (2012). Investment philosophies. Successful strategies and the investors who made them work. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  4. Fagerberg J., Fosaas M., & Sapprasert K. (2012). Innovation: exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy, 41(7). doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.008.
  5. Goldsmith R.E., & Foxall G.R. (2003). The measurement of innovativeness. In: L.V. Shavinina (Ed.). The international handbook on innovation. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Ltd. doi: 10.1016/B978-008044198-6/50022-X.
  6. Hall B.H. (1999). Innovation and market value. SSRN. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.151912.
  7. Hall B.H., Jaffe A., & Trajtenberg M. (2005). Market value and patent citations, Rand Journal of Economics, 36(1).
  8. Hirshleifer D., Hsu P-H., & Lic D. (2013). Innovative efficiency and stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 107(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.09.011.
  9. Hult G.T.M., Hurleyb R.F., & Knightc G.A. (2004). Innovativeness: its antecedents and impact on business performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(5). doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.08.015.
  10. Jajuga K. (2009). Basic investment strategies. Retrieved from: strategie inwestowania_tcm75-17590.pdf, (15.03.2017).
  11. Jin Z., Hewitt-Dundas N. & Thompson N.J. (2004). Innovativeness and performance: evidence from manufacturing sectors. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 12(4). doi: 10.1080/0965254042000308075.
  12. Jovanovic B., & Macdonald G.M. (1994). The life cycle of a competitive industry. Journal of Political Economy, 102(2). doi: 10.1086/261934.
  13. Kotler Ph. (1994). Marketing. Analysis, planning, implementation and control. Warsaw: Gebethner and Co.
  14. Lev B. (2001). Intangibles: management, measurement and reporting. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
  15. Lichtarski J. (1999). Basics of enterprise science. Wroclaw: Publishing house of the Academy of Economics in Wroclaw.
  16. Mazzucato M. (2006). Innovation and stock prices: a review of some recent work. Revue de l'OFCE, 97(5). doi: 10.3917/reof.073.0159.
  17. Morgan R.E., & Berthon P. (2008). Market orientation, generative learning, innovation strategy and business performance inter-relationships in bioscience firms. Journal of Management Studies, 45(8). doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00778.x.
  18. Nawrocki T., & Żabka A. (2011). Innovations activity of Polish listed companies. Economics and Organization of Enterprises, 11.
  19. Nawrocki T. (2012). Product innovativeness of enterprises. Assessment methodology on the example of listed companies. Warsaw: CeDeWu.
  20. Nawrocki T. (2016a). Efficiency of strategy regarding investment in shares of innovative companies listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange. Organization Review, 2.
  21. Nawrocki T. (2016b). Risk of enterprises innovative activity in the context of their financial results. Management Sciences, 1(26).
  22. OECD/European Communities (2005). Guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data - Oslo Manual. Paris: OECD/European Communities.
  23. Onag A.O., Tepeci M., & Başalp A.A. (2014). Organizational learning capability and its impact on firm innovativeness. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences, 150. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.029.
  24. Pakes A. (1985). On patents, R&D, and the stock market rate of return. Journal of Political Economy, 93(2). doi: 10.1086/261305.
  25. Pomykalski A. (2001). Innovation management. Warsaw-Lodz: PWN.
  26. Prahalad C.K., & Hamel G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation, Harvard Business Review, May-June.
  27. Prajogo D.I. (2006). The relationship between innovation and business performance - a comparative study between manufacturing and service firms. Knowledge and Process Management, 13(3). doi: 10.1002/kpm.259.
  28. Prorokowski L. (2014). Is investing in innovation an effective strategy in times of crisis? Some evidence from Poland. Innovation: Organization & Management, 16(1). doi: 10.5172/impp.2014.16.1.32.
  29. Rogers E.M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
  30. Schumpeter J. (1960). Theory of economic development. Warsaw: PWN.
  31. Sosnowska A. (2000). Management of an innovative company. Warsaw: Difin.
  32. Świtalski W. (2005). Innovation and competitiveness. Warsaw: Publishing house of the University of Warsaw.
  33. Tellis G.J., & Golder P.N. (1996). First to market, first to fail? Real causes of enduring market leadership. MIT Sloan Management Review, 37(2).
  34. and (22.03.2017).
  35. (16.03.2017).
Cited by
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu