BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Author
Kuźnar Andżelika (Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie), Menkes Jerzy (Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie)
Title
Instytucje polityki "post-pivot" w Azji - wybrane aspekty
Institutions of "Post-Pivot" Policy in Asia - Selected Aspects
Source
International Business and Global Economy, 2018, nr 37, s. 98-113, bibliogr. 41 poz.
Biznes Międzynarodowy w Gospodarce Globalnej
Keyword
Stosunki międzynarodowe, Wartości i normy etyczne, Międzynarodowa współpraca regionalna, Współpraca regionalna
International relations, Value and ethical norms, International regional cooperation, Regional cooperation
Note
JEL Classification: F13, F53, K33, N45, O15
summ., streszcz.
Country
Region Azji i Pacyfiku
Asia-Pacific region
Abstract
Region Pacyfiku konfrontuje się z wieloma wyzwaniami, stanowiącymi o jego wadze w stosunkach międzynarodowych. Celem badania jest analiza możliwości współpracy państw tego regionu - bliskich geograficznie, ale posiadających odmienne doświadczenia historyczne oraz różnych pod względem ustroju społeczno-polityczno-gospodarczego w sytuacji niestabilności polityki USA. Zmiany w tej polityce stanowią Źródło turbulencji w regionie oraz stosunkach transregionalnych. W interdyscyplinarnym badaniu ekonomiczno-prawniczym wykorzystujemy metody ekonomicznej analizy jakościowej i ilościowej oraz prawnicze metody studiów nad instytucjami międzynarodowymi. Pozytywnie weryfikujemy tezę, że trwała i głęboka współpraca regionalna i transregionalna jest zdeterminowana reprezentowaniem wspólnych wartości, a sama bliskość geograficzna nie wystarcza, by taka współpraca miała miejsce. Barierą dla współpracy może okazać się niezdolność do przepracowania doświadczeń z przeszłości oraz niestabilność wynikająca m.in. ze zmian w polityce USA.(abstrakt oryginalny)

The Pacific region is confronted with many challenges that determine its importance in international relations. The aim of the study is to analyse the possibilities of cooperation of countries in this region - geographically close but with different historical experiences and differing in terms of socio-political and economic systems at the time of instability of US politics. Changes in this policy are a source of turbulence in the region and transregional relations. In interdisciplinary economic and legal research we use methods of economic qualitative and quantitative analysis as well as legal methods of studies on international institutions. We positively verify the thesis that lasting and deep regional and transregional cooperation is determined by the representation of common values, and geographic proximity alone is not enough for such cooperation to take place. The barrier for the cooperation may be the inability to work through the past experience and instability, resulting from the changes in US policy.(original abstract)
Full text
Show
Bibliography
Show
  1. America First Foreign Policy, 2017, https://www.whitehouse.gov/america-first-foreign- policy [dostęp: 24.06.2017].
  2. Asian Review, 2017, October 25, https://asia.nikkei.com/Politics-Economy/International-Relations/Japan-to-propose-dialogue-with-US-India-and-Australia [dostęp: 24.11.2017].
  3. Baker P., 2017, Trump Says NATO Allies Don't Pay Their Share. Is That True?, The New York Times, May 26.
  4. Capaldo J., 2015, TTIP. European Disintegration, Unemployment and Instability, Economia & Lavoro, August.
  5. Capaldo J., Izurieta A., Sundaram J.K., 2016, Trading down. Unemployment, Inequality and other risks of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement, Global Development and Environmental Institute Working Paper, no. 16-01.
  6. CNBC, 2018, January 25, https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/25/trump-says-he-would-reconsider-trans-pacific-partnership-trade-deal.html [dostęp: 28.01.2018].
  7. Collinson S., 2017, Trump New action coming on security next week, CNN, https://edition.cnn.com/2017/02/10/politics/trump-abe-press-conference/index.html [dostęp: 24.11.2017].
  8. Cronin P.M., 2017, Trump's Post-Pivot Strategy, The Diplomate, November 11.
  9. Eisenhower D.D., 1954, The President's News Conference, April 7, Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project, http://www.presidency. ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=10202 [dostęp: 24.11.2017].
  10. Erixon F., Bauer M., 2015, "Splendid Isolation" as trade policy. Mercantilism and Crude Keynesianism in the "Capaldo Study" of TTIP, European Center for International Political Economy, April.
  11. Eyal J., 2016, Japan-India. An Alliance with a difference, The Straits Time, November 7.
  12. Freedom in the World, 2018, Freedom House, https://freedomhouse.org/report-types/freedom-world [dostęp: 10.02.2018].
  13. Gaouette N., 2017, Tillerson raps China as 'predatory' rule breaker, CNN Politics, October 19.
  14. Green J., Goodman M.P., 2015, After TPP. The Geopolitics of Asia and Pacific, The Washington Quarterly, vol. 38, issue 4.
  15. Gregory J., 2018, Britain exploring membership of the TPP to boost trade after Brexit, The Guardian, January 3.
  16. Human Development Index, 2016, http://hdr.undp.org/en/composite/trends [dostęp: 10.02.2018].
  17. Hutt D., 2017, The 'Indo-Pacific' Vision. Room For Britain And France?, Forbes, November 14.
  18. Jaipragas B., 2017, Why is the US calling Asia-Pacific the Indo-Pacific? Donald Trump to 'Clarify', November 7, http://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/2118806/why-us-calling-asia-pacific-indo-pacific-trump-clarify [dostęp: 10.01.2018].
  19. Johnson B., 2016, Britain is back East of Suez, December 9, https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/foreign-secretary-speech-britain-is-back-east-of-suez [dostęp: 10.11.2017].
  20. Johnston A.I., 1995, Thing about Strategic Culture, International Security, vol. 19, no. 4.
  21. Karta Narodów Zjednoczonych, 1945, http://libr.sejm.gov.pl/tek01/txt/onz/1945.html [dostęp: 10.10.2017].
  22. Khurana G.S., 2007, Security of sea Lines. Prospects for India-Japan Cooperation, Strategic Analysis, vol. 31, no. 1.
  23. Kissinger H., 1996, Dyplomacja, Philip Wilson, Warszawa.
  24. Lieberthal K., 2011, The American Pivot to Asia, Foreign Policy, December 21.
  25. Medcalf R., 2013, The Indo-Pacific. What's in a Name?, Brookings, October, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-indo-pacific-whats-in-a-name/ [dostęp: 16.06.2017].
  26. Naughtoton B., Kroeber A.R., de Jonquieres G., Webster G., 2015, What will the TPP mean for China? The agreement could indirectly spur Chinese economic reform, but may also pull its neighbors closer to the United States, Foreign Policy, October 7.
  27. NORSAR, 2017, The nuclear explosion in North Korea on 3 September: A revised magnitude assessment, September 12, https://www.norsar.no/press/latest-press-release/archive/the- nuclear-explosion-in-north-korea-on-3-september-2017-a-revised-magnitude-assessment- article1548-984.html [dostęp: 06.12.2017].
  28. Palit A., 2014, The Trans Pacific Partnership, China and India. Economic and Political Implications, Routledge, New York.
  29. Pew Global Attitudes & Trends Question Database, 2018, http://www.pewglobal.org/question-search/?qid=2101&cntIDs=&stdIDs [dostęp: 06.02.2018].
  30. Presidential Memorandum regarding withdrawal of the United States from Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiations and Agreement, 2017, January 23, https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/presidential-memorandum-regarding-withdrawal-united-states-trans-pacific-partnership-negotiations-agreement/ [dostęp: 06.02.2018].
  31. Pye L.W., 1990, China. Erratic State, frustrated Society, Foreign Affairs, vol. 69, no. 4.
  32. Remarks at APEC CEO Summit, 2017, https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/11/10/remarks-president-trump-apec-ceo-summit-da-nang-vietnam [dostęp: 05.11.2017].
  33. Sanger D.E., Haberman M., 2016, Donald Trump sets conditions for defending NATO Allies against attack, New York Times, July 20.
  34. Scott D., 2017, French maritime Strategic thought on the Indo-Pacific, Center for International Maritime Security, March 31.
  35. Stanley T., 2016, Boris of Arabia? Johnson's plan to restore Britain 'east of Suez' is audacious, The Telegraph, December 10.
  36. USITC, 2016, Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement. Likely Impact on the U.S. Economy and on Specific Industry Sectors, May, no. 4607.
  37. Vásquez I., Porčnik T., 2017, The Human Freedom Index 2017, Cato Institute, Fraser Institute, Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom.
  38. Viray P.L., 2017, US. We will not ignore China's challenge to rules-based order, The Philippine Star, October 19.
  39. White House, 2017, Remarks by President Trump to the National Assembly of the Republic of Korea, Seoul, November 7, https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/11/07/remarks-president-trump-national-assembly-republic-korea-seoul-republic [dostęp: 05.12.2017].
  40. Wikiquote, 2017, https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Talk:Franklin_D._Roosevelt [dostęp: 10.06.2017].
  41. World Bank, 2016, Potential Macroeconomic Implications on the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Global Economic Prospects, January, Chapter 4.
Cited by
Show
ISSN
2300-6102
Language
pol
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.4467/23539496IB.18.007.9380
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu