BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Author
Khobta Valentina (Donetsk National Technical University, Ukraine), Kladchenko Irene (Donetsk National Technical University, Ukraine)
Title
Decomposition of the Modern Enterprise Balanced Development Ensuring's Problem in Stakeholder Theory Context
Source
Research Papers in Economics and Finance, 2018, vol. 3, nr 1, s. 17-26, rys., tab., bibliogr. 28 poz.
Keyword
Społeczna odpowiedzialność biznesu, Interesariusze, Rozwój zrównoważony
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Stakeholders, Sustainable development
Note
summ.
Abstract
The paper deals with urgent problems of enterprise's sustainable development in terms of finding balance between social responsibility, ecological sustainability and economic viability. A modern organization operates in a complicated environment, being characterized with higher degree of social accountability and strict ecological limits. According to this, complexity and multitasking of ensuring balanced development of an enterprise are stressed in the article. A hidden connection between sustainable development and interests balance of company's stakeholders is highlighted. Based on the advantages of T. Saaty's AHP approach for solving complicated problems, a five-level hierarchy is formed. The presented decomposition gives the hierarchic understanding, concept and structure of process of ensuring balanced development of an enterprise. A mathematical and graphic description of the impact of each of the separated levels of the problem focus is made.(original abstract)
Full text
Show
Bibliography
Show
  1. Amosha, O., Kharazishvili, Y., Liashenko, V., & Kvilinskyi, O. (2016). Economic security of sustainable development of the regions (based on the example of the Donetsk region), (in:) Pająk K. (ed.), Gospodarka niskoemisyjna i jej wpływ na rozwój województwa wielkopolskiego, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa, pp. 19-34.
  2. Baumol, W. J. (1970). A New rationale for corporate social policy, New York.
  3. Bowen, H. (1953). Social responsibility of the businessman, Harper and Row, New York.
  4. Bowie, N., 1988, The Moral Obligations of Multinational Corporations, Problems of International Justice, Ed. Steven Luper-Foy, Westview Press, pp. 97-113.
  5. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Towards the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders, Business Horizons, Jul.-Aug., pp. 39-48.
  6. Crowther, D., Aras, G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility, http://bookboon.com/en/defining-corporate-social-responsibility-ebook.
  7. De Gooyert, V., Rouwette, E., Van Kranenburg, H., & Freeman, E. (2017). Reviewing the role of stakeholders in operational research: a stakeholder theory perspective, European Journal of Operational Research, 262(2), pp. 402-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.03.079.
  8. Donaldson, T. (1982). Corporations and Morality, Prentice-Hall, New York.
  9. Donaldson, T., Preston, L. E. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications, Academy of Management Review, 20(1), pp. 65-91. https://doi.org/10.2307/258887
  10. Freeman, E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach, Boston.
  11. Henriques, A. (2012). Standards for change: ISO 26000 and sustainable development. International Institute for Environment and Development, London. http://iso26000.info/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Henriques-doc.pdf.
  12. International Standard ISO 26000:2010 Guidance on social responsibility. http://www.klubok.net/downloads-index-req-viewdownloaddetails-lid-243.html
  13. Jackson, T. (2009). Prosperity without growth, FiSH Books, Enfield.
  14. Jonson, H. L. (1971). Business in contemporary society: Framework and issues, Wadsworth, Belmont, California.
  15. Kharazishvili, Y., Lyashenko, V., Zaloznova, Y., Kvilinskyi, O. (2016). Impact of infrastructure component on socioeconomic approach to modernization of the region, European Cooperation, 8(15), pp. 108-119.
  16. Kwilinski, A. (2017). Development of industrial enterprise in the conditions of formation of information economics, Thai Science Review, Autumn 2017, pp. 85 - 90. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1414236
  17. Kwilinski, A. (2018a). Mechanism of Formation of Industrial Enterprise Development Strategy in the Information Economy, Virtual Economics, 1(1), pp. 7-24.
  18. Кwilinski, A. (2018b). Mechanism of Modernization of Industrial Sphere of Industrial Enterprise in Accordance with Requirements of the Information Economy, Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, pp. 116-128. http://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2018.4-11
  19. Lakhno, V., Malyukov, V., Bochulia, T., Hipters, Z., Kwilinski, A., & Tomashevska, O. (2018). Model of Managing of the Procedure of Mutual Financial Investing in Information Technologies and Smart City, International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 9(8), pp. 1802-1812. http://www.iaeme.com/MasterAdmin/UploadFolder/IJCIET_09_08_181/IJCIET_09_08_181.pdf
  20. Levitt, Th. (1973). The Third Sector: New Tactics for a Responsive Society, AMACOM, New York.
  21. Meadows, D. H. (1972). The Limits to Growth: a report for the Club of Rome's project on the predicament of mankind, Universe Books.
  22. Pająk, K., Kamińska, B., & Kvilinskyi, O. (2016). Modern trends of financial sector development under the virtual regionalization conditions, Financial and credit activity: problems of theory and practice, 2(21), 204-217. https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v2i21.91052
  23. Perez, C. A, Montequin, V. R., Fernandez, F. O., Balsera, J. O. (2017). Integrating Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and balanced Scorecard (BSC) Framework for Sustainable Business in a Software Factory in the Financial Sector, Sustainability, Vol. 9, pp. 1-16.
  24. Saaty, T. L. (1993). Prinyatie resheniy. Metod analiza ierarhiy, Izdatelstvo: Radio i Svyaz, Moskva.
  25. Saaty, T. L. (2001). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process: the Organization and Prioritization of Complexity, second edition, RWS Publications, New York.
  26. Sarman, S. R., Zainon, S., Atan, R., Bakar, Z. A., Yoke, S. K., Ahmad, S. A., & Shaari, N. H. M. (2015). The web-based accountability practices in social enterprises: Validating the stakeholder theory, Procedia Economics and Finance, Vol. 31, pp. 243-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01226-5
  27. Theodoulidis, B., Diaz, D., Crotto, F., & Rancati, E. (2017). Exploring corporate social responsibility and financial performance through stakeholder theory in the tourism industries, Tourism Management, Vol. 62, pp. 173-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.03.018
  28. Tullberg, J. (2013). Stakeholder theory: Some revisionist suggestions, The Journal of Socio-Economics, Vol. 42, pp. 127-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2012.11.014
Cited by
Show
ISSN
2543-6430
Language
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.18559/ref.2018.1.2
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu