BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Author
Przystupa Jan (Narodowy Bank Polski)
Title
Symmetric or Asymmetric? : Monetary Policy and Polish Economy Reactions over the Business Cycle
Source
Bank i Kredyt, 2019, nr 4, s. 375-410, aneks, bibliogr. 39 poz.
Bank & Credit
Keyword
Polityka pieniężna, Cykl koniunkturalny, Modele nieliniowe, Wyniki badań
Monetary policy, Business cycles, Nonlinear models, Research results
Note
JEL Classification: C11, C32, C61, E12, E32, E52
summ.
Abstract
In the paper, we examine whether monetary policy and reactions of the economy to monetary policy are symmetric over the business cycle. Not only do we study the differences between prosperity and slump, but also between all the phases of the business cycle, i.e. recovery, expansion, recession and depression. Moreover, we analyse reactions in all points of the business cycle. We find asymmetry in the reactions of monetary policy for the output gap close to zero, but the result disappears in a shorter sample. The effects of monetary policy are symmetric for the output gap between - 2.0% and 1.5%. The asymmetry appears with the output gap getting closer to its extreme values. This result is robust across various samples. (original abstract)
Accessibility
The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics
The Library of Warsaw School of Economics
The Library of University of Economics in Katowice
The Main Library of Poznań University of Economics and Business
Full text
Show
Bibliography
Show
  1. Ang A., Bekaert G., Wei M. (2008), The term structure of real rates and expected inflation, The Journal of Finance, 63(2), 797-849.
  2. Barnichon R., Matthes C. (2016), Gaussian mixture approximations of impulse responses and the nonlinear effects of monetary shocks, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Working Paper Series WP, 16-08.
  3. Bean Ch.R. (2004),Asset prices, financial instability, and monetary policy, American Economic Review, 94(2), 14 -18.
  4. Boinet V., Martin Ch. (2006), Optimal non-linear monetary policy rules, Brunel Business School, Brunel University.
  5. Boivin J., Kiley M., Mishkin F. (2010), How has the monetary transmission mechanism evolved over time?, NBER Working Paper, 15879.
  6. Borio C., Hofmann B. (2017), Is Monetary Policy Less Effective When Interest Rates Are Persistently Low?, Reserve Bank of Australia.
  7. Caner M., Hansen B. (2004), Instrumental variable estimation of a threshold model, Econometric Theory, 20(05), 813-843.
  8. Carabenciov I., Freedman Ch., Garcia-Saltos R., Laxton D., Kamenik O., Manchev C. (2013), GPM6 - the global projection model with 6 regions, IMF Working Paper, WP/13/87.
  9. Clark C., Laxton D., Rose D. (1996), Asymmetry in the U.S. output-inflation nexus, Staff Papers, 43(1), International Monetary Fund.
  10. Dupasquier C., Ricketts N. (1998), Non-linearities in the output-inflation relationship: some empirical results for Canada, Bank of Canada Working Paper, 98-14.
  11. Eisner R. (1997), A new view of the NAIRU, in: P. Davidson, J. Kregel (eds.): Improving the Global Economy: Keynesianism and the Growth in Output and Employment, Edward Elgar.
  12. Engel Ch., West K. (2004), Exchange Rates and Fundamentals, NBER Working Paper, w10723.
  13. Engel Ch., West K. (2006), Taylor rules and the Deutschmark - Dollar real exchange rate, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 38(5), 1175-1194.
  14. Filardo A. (1998), New evidence on the output cost of fighting inflation, Economic Review, 3rd quarter, 33 - 61.
  15. Forbes K., Hjortsoe I., Nenova T. (2017), Shocks versus structure: explaining differences in exchange rate pass-through across countries and time, Discussion Paper, 50, June, Bank of England, External MPC Unit.
  16. Gali J., Gertler M. (1999), Inflation dynamics: a structural econometric analysis, Journal of Monetary Economics, 44(2), 195-222.
  17. Gali J., Gertler M., López-Salido D. (2005), Robustness of the estimates of the hybrid New Keynesian Phillips curve, Journal of Monetary Economics, 52(6), 1107-1118.
  18. Gali J. (2018), The State of New Keynesian Economics: A Partial Assessment, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(3), 87-112.
  19. Gradzewicz M., Growiec J., Hagemejer J., Popowski, P. (2010), Cykl koniunkturalny w Polsce - wnioski z analizy spektralnej, Bank i Kredyt, 41(5), 41-76.
  20. Granziera E., Haavio M., Juselius M., Kortelainen M., Vilmi L. (2018), Post-crisis monetary policy modelling, Bank of Finland Bulletin,1/2018.
  21. Houck J.P. (1977), An Approach to Specifying and Estimating Nonreversible Functions, American Journal of Agricultural Economics,59(3), 570-572.
  22. Lagoa S. (2011), Determinants of inflation differentials in the euro area: Is the New Keynesian Phillips Curve enough?, DINAMIA'CET Working Paper, 2011/08, November, https://repositorio.iscte-iul.pt/ bitstream/10071/3687/1/DINAMIA_WP_2011-08.pdf.
  23. Lo Ming Chien, Piger J. (2005), Is the response of output to monetary policy asymmetric? Evidence from a regime-switching coefficients model, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, 37(5), 865-886.
  24. Mancini-Griffoli T. (2011), Dynare User Guide. An introduction to the solution & estimation od DSGE models, http://www.dynare.org/documentation-and-support/user-guide/Dynare-UserGuide- ebBeta.pdf.
  25. Nobay B., Peel D. (2000), Optimal monetary policy with a nonlinear Phillips curve, Economics Letters, 67(2), 159 -164.
  26. Orphanides A., Williams J.C. (2004): Robust Monetary Policy with Imperfect Knowledge, Conference on Monetary Policy and Imperfect Knowledge, Würzburg, 14-15 October.
  27. Przystupa J., Wróbel E. (2011), Asymmetry of the exchange rate pass-through: an exercise on the Polish data, Eastern European Economics, 49(1), 30-51.
  28. Przystupa J., Wróbel E. (2016), Modelling monetary transmission in less developed emerging markets: the case of Tunisia, Bank i Kredyt, 47(5), 395-434.
  29. Schaling E. (1999), The non-linear Phillips curve and inflation forecast targeting, Bank of England Working Papers, 98.
  30. Semmler W., Zhang W. (2004), Monetary policy with nonlinear Phillips curve and endogenous NAIRU, Working Paper, 55, February, University of Bielefeld, Center for Empirical Macroeconomics.
  31. Skrzypczyńska M. (2013), Cykl koniunkturalny w Polsce - analiza sektorowa, Bank i Kredyt, 44(2), 175-206.
  32. Stiglitz J. (1997), Reflections on the natural rate hypothesis, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(1), 3-10.
  33. Taylor J.B. (1995), The monetary transmission mechanism: an empirical framework, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 11-26.
  34. Tenreyro S., Thwaites G. (2016), Pushing on a string: US monetary policy is less powerful in recessions, American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 8(4), 43-74.
  35. Wadhwani S. (1999), On sterling's puzzling behaviour, Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, November.
  36. Walsh C. (2017), Monetary Theory and Policy, MIT Press.
  37. Wolffram R. (1971), Positive measures of aggregate supply elasticities: some new approach - some critical notes, American Journal of Agricultural Economics,53(2), 356-359.
  38. Wu J.C., Xia F.D. (2016), Measuring the macroeconomic impact of monetary policy at the zero lower bound, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 48(2-3), 253-291.
  39. Wu J.C., Zhang J. (2017), A shadow rate New Keynesian Model, Chicago Booth Research Paper, 16-18, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2843627
Cited by
Show
ISSN
0137-5520
Language
eng
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu