BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Kachniewska Magdalena (Warsaw School of Economics)
Scientific Communication in the World of Digital Technologies: Conditions and Perspectives Regarding the Development of Scientific Journals
Folia Turistica / Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego im. B. Czecha w Krakowie, 2019, nr 50(1), s. 307-349, rys., bibliogr. 89 poz.
Technologie cyfrowe, Archiwizacja, Biblioteki, Otwarte zasoby, Komunikowanie, Piśmiennictwo naukowe, Czasopiśmiennictwo, Otwarty dostęp
Digital technologies, Archiving, Libraries, Open resources, Communication, Scientific literature, Periodicals, Open access
summ., Folia Turistica - creating an English-language version of the journal - task financed under agreement No. 885/P-DUN/2019 from the funds of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education (MNiSW) designated for activity aimed at the popularization of science.
Purpose. The presentation of challenges with which scientific journals and - more broadly - scientific communication, will have to face in the substantive, technological and financial sphere in the conditions of constant evolution of the digital world, dynamic development of new information systems in science (e-library, library 2.0) and new phenomena conditioning the behaviour of Internet users.
Method. The views presented in the article are the result of a review of literature regarding scientific journals and empirical research, which was conducted from April to August 2018 among 132 authors representing the world of science and economic practices.
Findings. The open access (OA) movement has caused significant changes in the behaviour of people of science in publishing and depositing research results. The prospect of taking over all the functions of scientific journals by scientific repositories still seems to be distant due to the lack of alternative methods for assessing the quality of scientific publications. There are doubts about the division into scientific, institutional repositories and the repositories belonging to scientific journals, which results from unclear business models of individual solutions. The phenomenon of self-publishing is stimulated by the dynamic development of research carried out by business units, skilfully analysing the resources of large data sets and successfully popularising research results in social repositories. This is new quality in the area of information exchange, which requires rapid adaptation on scientific grounds. An insufficiently implemented postulate to popularise scientific knowledge and its transfer to business practice remains an equally important challenge.
Research and conclusions limitations. The results of the survey based on the respondents' subjective assessment should be treated with caution and do not allow to draw general conclusions. The research revealed significant discrepancies in respondents' opinions regarding the future of scientific journals and their prospects for functioning in new information systems. The highest doubts concern the quality assessment system of scientific publications and the business model of scientific repositories: the significant number of stakeholders of the scientific communication system, dispersed in various scientific, political and economic systems, further limits the possibility of formulating unambiguous decisions in this respect.
Originality. The presented article formulates challenges for scientific journals whose functions are being increasingly taken over by scientific and social repositories. In contrast to the previously published works, this suggests solutions in the field of artificial intelligence, which will enable complete change in the way of publishing and validation of knowledge as well as quality control of scientific research.
Type of work. Review article. (original abstract)
The Library of University of Economics in Katowice
Full text
  1. Alejziak W., Liszewski S. (2016), Rola czasopism naukowych w transferze wiedzy w turystyce [The role of scientific journals in the transfer of knowledge in tourism] "Folia Turistica", Vol. 41, pp. 81-135.
  2. Antelman K. (2004), Do open-access articles have a greater research impact?, "College and Research Libraries", Vol. 65, No. 5, pp. 372-82.
  3. Bachrach S., Berry R.S., Blume M., von Foerster T., Fowler A., Ginsparg P., Heller S., Kestner N., Odlyzko A., Okerson A., Wigington R., Moffat A. (1998), Intellectual property: who should own scientific papers, "Science", Vol. 281, No. 5382, pp. 1459-60.
  4. Barrat J. (2013), Our Final Invention: Artificial Intelligence and the End of the Human Era, New York: Thomas Dunne Books, 2013, pp. 152.
  5. Bednarek-Michalska B. (2013), Modele biznesowe otwartego publikowania naukowego [Business models of Open Access scientific publishing], EBIB Society, (access 07.08.2018).
  6. Bot M., Burgemeester J. (1998), Costing Model for Publishing an Electronic Journal, Price Waterhouse Coopers, Utrecht.
  7. Boyce P. (2000), For better or for worse: preprints are here to stay, "College and Research Libraries News", Vol. 61, No. 5, pp. 404-714.
  8. Brown C. (2001a), The coming of age of e-prints in the literature of physics, "Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship", www.library.ucsb. edu/istl/01-summer/refereed.html (access 14.08.2018).
  9. Brown C. (2001b), The e-volution of preprints in the scholarly communication of physicists and astronomers, "Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology", Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 187-200.
  10. Bruce R., Cordewener B. (2018), Open science is all very well but how do you make it FAIR in practice?, (access 08.08.2018).
  11. Bush V. (1996/1945), As we may think, "Interactions", Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 35-46 (pierwotnie opublikowany w "Atlantic Monthly", Vol. 176, No. 1, pp. 101-8.
  12. Chan L., Hodges T. (2009), Cataloging and Classification, Lanham, 2007.
  13. Chan L.,Kirsop B. (2001), Open archiving oppportunities for developing countries: towards equitable distribution of global knowledge, "Ariadne", Vol. 30, (access 08.07.2018).
  14. Correia A.M, Teixeira J.C. (2005), Reforming Scholarly Publishing and Knowledge Communication, "Online International Review", Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 349-364.
  15. Cronin B., Overfelt K. (1995), E-journals and tenure, "Journal of the American Society for Information Science", Vol. 46, No. 9, pp. 700-3.
  16. Crow R. (2002), The Case of Institutional Repositories: A SPARC Position Paper, SPARC, Washington, DC, (access 20.07.2018).
  17. Day M. (1999), The scholarly journal in transition and the Pub Med Central proposal, "Ariadne", No. 21, html (access 07.07.2018).
  18. Drabek A. (2009), Polskie czasopisma open access- próba charakterystyki [Polish open access periodicals - an intent of characterization], "Bibliotheca Nostra", Vol. 3/4(19).
  19. Drabek A., Pulikowski A. (2005-2009), Arianta - Naukowe i fachowe polskie czasopisma elektroniczne, [Arianta - Polish scientific and professional electronic journals] (access 04.06.2018).
  20. Allen R., Hartland D. (2018), FAIR in practice - Jisc report on the Findable Accessible Interoperable and Reuseable Data Principles, https://zenodo. org/record/1245568#.W2q2MbhpxPa (access 08.08.2018).
  21. Garner J., Horwood L., Sullivan S. (2001), The place of eprints in scholarly information delivery, "Online Information Review", Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 250-6.
  22. Ginsparg P. (1997), Winners and losers in the global research village, "The Serials Librarian", Vol. 30, No. 3/4, html (access 06.06.2018).
  23. Guedon J. (2001), In Oldenburg's Long Shadow: Librarians, Research Scientists, and the Control of Scientific Publishing, ARL, Annapolis Junction, MD, (access 22.07.2018).
  24. Harnad S. (1990), Scholarly skywriting and the prepublication continuum of scientific inquiry, "Psychological Science", Vol. 1, pp. 324-43.
  25. Harnad S. (1998), Learned inquiry and the net: the role of peer review, peer commentary and copyright, "Learned Publishing", Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 183-92.
  26. Harnad S. (1999), Free at last: the future of the peer reviewed journal, "D-Lib Magazine", Vol. 5, No. 12, (access 12.06.2018).
  27. Harnad S. (2000), The invisible hand of peer review, "Exploit Interactive", No. 5, (access 02.06.2018).
  28. Harnad S. (2005), The implementation of the Berlin Declaration on Open Access, Report on Berlin 3 Meeting held 28 February-1 March 2005, Southampton, "D-Lib Magazine", Vol. 11, No. 3, harnad/03harnad.html (access 12.08.2018).
  29. Harnad S., Brody T. (2004), Comparing the impact of open access (OA) vs non-OA articles in the same journals, "D-Lib Magazine", Vol. 10, No. 6, (access 28.07.2018).
  30. Harnad S., Hemus M. (1998), All or none: no stable hybrid or half-way solutions for launching the learned periodical literature into the post-Gutenberg galaxy, [w:] Butterworth I., red., The Impact of Electronic Publishing on the Academic Community, Portland Press, London.
  31. Hitchcock S. (2005),The effect of open access and downloads ('hits') on citation impact: a bibliography of studies, The Open Citation Project: Reference Linking and Citation Analysis for Open Archives, http://opcit. (access 03.06.2018).
  32. Holtkamp I., Berg D.A. (2001), The Impact of Paul Ginsparg'se PrintarXivat Los Alamos National Laboratory on Scholarly Communication and Publishing: A Selected Bibliography, preprintsbib.htm (access 05.06.2018).
  33. Jackson P. (1998), Introduction To Expert Systems, Addison Wesley.
  34. Kamiski A. (2002), E-printowa rewolucja [E-print revolution], "Biuletyn EBIB", Vol. 33, (access 12.07.2018).
  35. Kaser D. (2005),Open Access Forum, "Online", Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 56-81.
  36. Kling R., McKim G. (1999), Scholarly communication and the continuum of electronic publishing, "Journal of American Society of Information Science", Vol. 50, No. 10, pp. 890-906.
  37. Kling R., Spector L., McKim G. (2002), Locally Controlled Scholarly Publishing via the Internet: The Guild Model, Center for Social Informatics, Bloomington, IN1.
  38. Komunikat Komisji dla Parlamentu Europejskiego, Rady i Europejskiego Komitetu Ekonomiczno-społecznego w sprawie informacji naukowej w epoce cyfrowej: dostęp, rozpowszechnianie i konserwacja (2007), sec(2007)181, =CELEX:52007DC0056&from=PL (access 08.08.2018).
  39. Krichel T. (2000), Working towards an open library for economics: The RePEc project, (access 07.08.2018).
  40. Kulczycki E. (2012), Otwarte czasopisma: zakładanie czasopism naukowych oraz transformacja czasopism zamkniętych [Open journals: setting up scientific journals and transformation of closed access journals], Toruń: Stowarzyszenie EBIB, 2012, p. 50, zwarte/article/view/112 (access 08.07.2018).
  41. Kulczycki E. (2017), Uważajcie na OSzustów w czasopismach [Watch out for fraudsters in journals], na-oszustow-w-czasopismach/ (access 08.08.2018).
  42. Kyrillidou M., Young M. (2002), Research Library Trends, Association of Research Libraries, Washington, DC, html (access 02.07.2018).
  43. Large A., Tedd L., Hartley RJ. (1999), Information Seeking in the Online Age: Principles and Practice, Bowker-Saur, London.
  44. Luce R. (2001), E-prints intersect the digital library: inside the Los Alamos arXiv, "Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship", Vol. 29, www. (acces s 12.08.2018).
  45. MacGregor J., Stranack K., Willinsky J. (2007), The Public Knowledge Project: Open Source Tools for Open Access to Scholarly Communication, html (access 01.07.2018).
  46. Maciejewska Ł., Moskwa K., Urbańczyk B. (2007), Czasopisma naukowe Open Access - model otwartego dostępu do wiedzy [Scientific journals Open Access - the model of open access to knowledge], IV Ogólnopolska Konferencja EBIB Internet w bibliotekach Open Access Toruń, 7-8 grudnia 2007, moskwa_urbanczyk.php#8 (access 12.07.2018).
  47. Meadows AJ. (1998), Communicating Research, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
  48. Mizarro S. (2003), Quality Control in Scholarly Publishing: A New Proposal, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 54, No. 11, pp. 989-1005.
  49. Morton B. (1997), Is the Journal as We Know It an Article of Faith? An Open Letter to the Faculty, "The Montana Professor" Vol. 7, pp. 11-14.
  50. Nahotko M. (2007), Naukowe czasopisma elektroniczne, [Scientific electronic journals], Seria: Nauka - Dydaktyka - Praktyka, t. 88, Wydaw. SBP, Warszawa.
  51. Niedźwiedzka B. (2005), Open Access, cz. 1. "Forum Akademickie" Vol. 4 htm (access 05.07.2018).
  52. Nowak P. (2000), Wybrane problemy efektywności polskich czasopism naukowych z dziedziny humanistyki [Selected problems of the effectiveness of Polish scientific journals in the field of humanities], Poznań, Motivex.
  53. Nowak P. (2009), "Samopublikowanie": stara metoda - nowy sens w dobie escience [in English: "Self-publishing": the old method - a new sense in the age of e-science] "Biblioteka", Vol. 13 (22), pp. 88-89.
  54. ODLIS (Online Dictionary of Library and Information Science) 2004-2007, (access 06.06.2018).
  55. Odlyzko A.M. (1995), Tragic loss or good riddance? The impending demise of traditional scholarly journals, "International Journal of Human- Computer Studies", Vol. 42, pp. 71-122, doc/tragic.loss.txt (access 05.06.2018).
  56. Okerson A. (1992), Publishing through the network: the 1990 debutante, "Scholarly Publishing", Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 170-7.
  57. Okerson A., O'Donnell J. (1995), Scholarly Journals at the Crossroads: A Subversive Proposal for Electronic Publishing, Association of Research Libraries, Washington, DC.
  58. Oppenheim C. (2000), The future of scholarly journal publishing, "Journal of Documentation", Vol. 56, No. 4, pp. 361-98.
  59. Pinfield S. (2001), How do physicists use an e-print archive. Implications for institutional e-print services, "D-Lib Magazine", Vol. 7, No. 12, pp. 134-142.
  60. Pinfield S. (2003), Open archives and UK institutions: an overview, "D-Lib Magazine", Vol. 9, No. 3, html (access 04.06.2018).
  61. Pinfield S. (2004a), Self-archiving publications, [in:] Gorman G.E., Rowland, S., eds., International Yearbook of Library and Information Management 2004-2005: Scholarly Publishing in an Electronic Era, Facet, London, pp. 118-45.
  62. Pinfiel, S. (2004b), What do universities want from publishing?, "Learned Publishing", Vol. 17, No. 4, archive/ 00000139/01/alpsp_04.pdf.
  63. Pinfield S., James H. (2003), The digital preservation of e-prints, "D-Lib Magazine", Vol. 9, No. 9, html (access 02.06.2018).
  64. Pinfield S., Gardner M., MacColl J. (2002), Setting up an institutional e-print archive, "Ariadne", No. 31, intro.html (access 02.08.2018).
  65. Prensky M. (2001), Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants, "On the Horizon", MCB University Press, Vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 1-6.
  66. Prinke R. (2010), Tradycyjne funkcje czasopisma naukowego a współczesne technologie komunikacyjne, Biblioteka", Vol. 14(23).
  67. Roberts J. (2016), Predatory Journals: Think before You Submit, Headache, "The Journal of Head and Face Pain", Vol. 56(4), pp. 18-21.
  68. Rosenberg D. (1997), University Libraries in Africa, International African Institute, (access 05.06.2018).
  69. Rowland F. (1997), Print journals: fit for the future?, "Ariadne", No. 7, www. (access 12.08.2018).
  70. Rozkosz E. (2014), Wokół czasopism naukowych [Around scientific journals], "Biuletyn EBIB", Vol. 4 (149)/2014.
  71. Rychlik M., Karwasińska E. (2008), Projekt powołania repozytorium Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu. Badanie ankietowe postaw pracowników naukowych [Project of establishing a repository of the University of Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan. Survey on attitudes of researchers], "Przegląd Biblioteczny", z. 3, pp. 451-466.
  72. Schauder D. (1994), Electronic publishing of professional articles: attitudes of academics and implications for the scholarly communication industry, "Journal of the American Society for Information Science", Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 73-100.
  73. Słownik języka polskiego [Polish dictionary], Warszawa, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 2017.
  74. Sompel H., Lagoze C. (2000), The Santa Fe Convention of the Open Archives Initiative, "D-Lib Magazine", Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 16-26.
  75. Stępniak J. (2013), Europa wobec wzrostu cen czasopism - warunki zjednoczenia [Europe and the rise in magazine prices - conditions for reunification], stepniak.pdf (access 12.06.2018).
  76. Sulston J., Stiglitz J. (2008), Science is being held back by outdated laws. The question "who owns science?" is now crucial, "The Times" 2008,http:// (access 12.08.2018).
  77. Swan A., Brown S. (2004), JISC/OSI Journal Authors Survey Report, Key Perspectives, Truro, uploaded_documents/JISCOAreportl. pdf (access 14.08.2018).
  78. Szymusiak T. (2015), Prosument - Prosumpcja - Prosumeryzm. Ekonomiczne oraz społeczne korzyści prosumpcji na przykładzie Polski oraz Niemiec [Prosumer - Prosumption - Prosumerism. Economic and social benefits of prosumer on the example of Poland and Germany], Wyd. Bezkresy Wiedzy, (access 08.08.2018).
  79. Światowy Szczyt ONZ na Rzecz Społeczeństwa Informacyjnego [United Nations World Summit for the Information Society] (WSIS) (2003), https:// (access 08.08.2018).
  80. Tenopir C., King D.W. (2000), Towards Electronic Journals: Realities for Scientists and Publishers, Special Libraries Association, Washington, DC.
  81. Tenopir C., King D.W., Boyce P., Grayson M., Zhang Y.,Ebuen M. (2003), Patterns of journal use by scientists through three evolutionary phases, "D-Lib Magazine", Vol. 9, No. 5, html (access 03.07.2018).
  82. Toffler A. (1980), The Third Wave, William Collins Sons & Co. Ltd., New York 1980.
  83. Twórca Public Knowledge Project Innowatorem Roku 2014 wg SPARC [in English: The Creator of the Public Knowledge Project as Innovator of the Year 2014 according to SPARC] [in:] Otwarta nauka [Open Science] 2014, Jan 29 knowledge-project-innowatorem-roku-2014-wg-sparc (access 18.08.2018).
  84. Wade S. (2014), Memex, (access 27.07.2018).
  85. Walker T.J. (2002), Two Societies Show How to Profit by Providing Free Access, "Learned Publishing", epub/ALPSPmsDS2.pdf (access 14.07.2018).
  86. Warr W. (2001), A Report on the Presentation "Chemistry Preprint Server: A Revolution in Chemistry Communication", cps/cps.pdf (access 14.08.2018).
  87. Willinsky J. (2003), Scholarly associations and the economic viabi lity of open access publishing, "Journal of Digital Information", Vol. 4, No. 2, paper no 177, v04/i02/Willinsky/#Rosenberg97 (access 04.07.2018).
  88. Willinsky J. (2005), Open Journal Systems: An example of open source software for journal management and publishing, "Library Hi Tech", Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 504-519.
  89. Who are information scientists? (2018), J-Gate, home/2018/07/18/who-are-information-scientists/ (access 08.08.2018).
Cited by
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu