BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Author
Bălan Mariana (Romanian Academy, Bucharest, Romania)
Title
Particularities of the Recent Evolution of Higher Education in Romania : Analysis and Forecasts
Source
Journal of Intercultural Management, 2019, vol. 11, nr 3, s. 87-104, rys., tab., bibliogr. 21 poz.
Keyword
Rynek pracy, Szkolnictwo wyższe, Modele Markowa, Prognozowanie
Labour market, Higher education, Markov models, Forecasting
Note
JEL Classification: C53, I23
summ.
Country
Rumunia
Romania
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this article is to present a brief analysis of the Romanian higher education system from the perspective of basic indicators, as well as the use of Markovian techniques for studying the evolution of the schooling process.
Methodology: The descriptive statistical analysis was mainly used to visualize and synthesize the information extracted from the data on the Romanian higher education system. Markovian methods were used to study and predict the evolution of the schooling process.
Findings: The rapid dynamics of the number of students in Romania in the last two decades has been accompanied by a series of structural changes, of which the most important are: a) constantly increasing the degree of feminisation of student achievements and b) increasing the relative importance of economic studies, legal studies and other social sciences, while reducing the relative importance of technical sciences and of medical-pharmaceutical studies within university specialties. Also, the distribution of the graduates' specializations correlated to a very small extent with the requirements of economic and social activity. It can be said that the development of tertiary education in Romania was stimulated mainly by the action of factors of social and cultural nature and only at second level by the demand for qualified personnel generated by the productive apparatus.
Value Added: This study highlights the current state of Romanian higher education. The fact that the evolution of tertiary education has been "explosive" over the past two decades makes some econometric methods, involving the use of stationary data or which have a high degree of complexity, more difficult to use. In this context, the use of Markovian modelling methods for studying and forecasting the evolution of the schooling process can contribute to improving access to and participation in higher education.
Recommendations: In the current conjucture, when trying to increase the insertion of graduates into the labour market, it is natural for decision-makers to use various estimation methods and techniques that allow them to correlate university study programs with the needs of the labour market and at the same time provide them with scientific support for their prognosis. (original abstract)
Full text
Show
Bibliography
Show
  1. Annual Report, University "Ştefan cel Mare" of Suceava (2018). www.usv.ro.
  2. Annual Report, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest (2018). www.usamv.ro.
  3. Ashley, E. S., Guttorp, P., Anderson, J., & Caccia, D. C. (2002). A Simple Markov Chain. National Research Center for Statistics and the Environment, University of Washington.
  4. Declaration of the European Ministers of Vocational Education and Training, and the European Commission, convened in Copenhagen on 29 and 30 November 2002, on enhanced European cooperation in vocational education and training "The Copenhagen Declaration". http://www.cedefop.europa.eu.
  5. Declaration of the Ministers in charge of vocational education and training - of EU Member States, Candidate Countries, European Economic Area Countries (2015). Riga. https://www.izm.gov.lv
  6. EUROPE 2020. A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. European Commission: Brussels, 3.3.2010 COM (2010., https://ec.europa.eu.
  7. European Quality Assurance in Vocational Education and Training (EQAVET) (2010). The Bruges Communiqué. https://www.eqavet.eu/Aligning-with-EQAVET.
  8. Eurostat statistics, www.eu.europe.eu.
  9. Gheţău, V. (2018). Demografia României. Bucureşti: Editura Academiei Române.
  10. Iosifescu, M., Grigorescu, S., Oprişan, Gh., & Popescu, Gh. (1984). Elemente de modelare stohastică. Bucureşti: Editura Tehnică.
  11. Klock, F., & Nimmer, J. (2001). Markov Models, ESP High School Studies Program Lecture 10, M-20A: Square Peg Solutions August.
  12. Law no.1 / 2011, National Education, Art. 117. https://www.edu.ro.
  13. National System of Indicators for Education. Methodological Guide, Bucharest, 2014, www. edu.ro.
  14. PISA for Development Assessment and Analytical Framework, Reading, Mathematics and Science. PISA results 2017. www.oecd.org.
  15. Ratitch, B., & Precup, D. (2001). Characterizing Markov Decision Processes. Montreal, Canada: McGill University.
  16. Report on the state of higher education in Romania 2016-2017. Ministry of National Education. https://www.edu.ro.
  17. Report on the state of higher education in Romania 2017-2018, Ministry of National Education. https://www.edu.ro.
  18. Statistical notebooks on Higher Education, National Institute of Statistics (NIS), 2012-2018.
  19. Stefǎnescu, St. (2000). Numerical Analysis. Bucharest: University of Bucharest Publishing House.
  20. TEMPO-online database of the National Institute of Statistics. www.insse.ro.
  21. White, D. J. (1993). Markov Decision Processes. Willey John W. &Sons.
Cited by
Show
ISSN
2080-0150
Language
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/joim-2019-0019
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu