BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Author
Zieliński Mariusz (Opole University of Technology)
Title
Impact of the Employment and Unemployment Level on the use of Flexible Forms of Employment in EU Countries
Wpływ poziomu zatrudnienia i bezrobocia na wykorzystanie elastycznych form zatrudnienia w krajach UE
Source
Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 2019, nr 6 (63), s. 127-136, tab., bibliogr. 14 poz.
Research Papers of Wrocław University of Economics
Keyword
Stopa bezrobocia, Elastyczność zatrudnienia
Unemployment rate, Flexible employment
Note
JEL Classification: E24, J20, J21, J70
streszcz., summ.
Company
Unia Europejska (UE)
European Union (EU)
Abstract
Celem artykułu było zbadanie zależności między zmianami poziomu zatrudnienia i stopy bezrobocia a udziałem form niestandardowych w zatrudnieniu w krajach Unii Europejskiej w perspektywie długoterminowej. Przyjęto hipotezę, że zmiany poziomu zatrudnienia i stopy bezrobocia są związane ze zmianami udziału niestandardowych form zatrudnienia w zatrudnieniu ogółem. Ocena zależności między badanymi wielkościami dotyczy grupy wiekowej 15-64 lata. W celu weryfikacji hipotezy obliczono współczynniki korelacji liniowej i determinacji między badanymi wielkościami w latach 2006-2017. Wyniki badań wskazują na duże zróżnicowanie sytuacji na rynkach pracy różnych krajów, jeśli chodzi zarówno o udział niestandardowych form zatrudnienia, jak i ich reakcji na zmiany w zatrudnieniu i bezrobociu.(abstrakt oryginalny)

The aim of the article is to examine the correlation between changes in the level of employment and unemployment rate and the share of non-standard (flexible) forms of employment in the countries of the European Union in the long-term perspective. The hypothesis is that changes in the employment level and unemployment rate are related to the changes in the share of non-standard forms of employment in overall employment. The assessment of the relationship between the studied values refers to the age group of between 15 and 64-year olds. Coefficients of linear correlation and determination between the studied values in 2006-2017 were calculated in order to verify the hypothesis. The results of the research indicate that the situation is very different in different national labour markets, both in terms of the share of nonstandard forms of employment and their reactions to changes in employment and unemployment.(original abstract)
Accessibility
The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics
The Library of University of Economics in Katowice
The Main Library of Poznań University of Economics and Business
Full text
Show
Bibliography
Show
  1. Amuedo-Dorantes C., Serrano-Padial R., 2010, Labor market flexibility and poverty dynamics, Labour Economics, no. 17, pp. 632-642.
  2. Bloisi W., 2007, An introduction to Human Resource Management, McGraw Hill, London.
  3. Blundell R., Crawford C., Jin W., 2014, What can wages and employment tell us about the UK's productivity puzzle?, The Economic Journal, no. 124, pp. 377-407.
  4. Burgess J., Connel J., 2006, Temporary work and human resources management: Issues, challenges and responses, Personnel Review, no. 2, pp. 129-141.
  5. Debels A., 2005, The structuring of labour market dynamic along the permanent-temporary distinction: A comparison of Denmark, France, Spain and the United Kingdom, www.iser.essex.ac.uk/files/ conferences/epunet/2005/docs/pdf/papers/debels.pdf
  6. Fouarge D., de Grip A., Smits W., de Vries R., 2012, Flexible contracts and human capital investments, De Economist, vol. 160, pp. 177-195.
  7. Gaston N., Kishi T., 2007, Part-time workers doing full-time work in Japan, J. Japanese Int. Economies, no. 21, pp. 435-454.
  8. Hauseman S., 2001, Why employers use flexible staffing arrangements: Evidence from an establishment survey, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, no. 55, pp. 149-170.
  9. Hölscher J., Perugini C., Pompei F., 2011, Wage inequality, labour market flexibility and duality in Eastern and Western Europe, Post-Communist Economies, no. 3, pp. 271-310.
  10. Kalleberg A.L., Reynolds J., Marsden P.V., 2003, Externalizing employment: Flexible staffing arrangements in US organizations, Social Science Research, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 525-552.
  11. Kossek E.E., Barber A.E., Winters D., 1999, Using flexible schedules in the managerial world: The power of the press, Human Resource Management, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 33-46.
  12. Need A., Steijn B., Gesthuizen M., 2005, Long-term effects of flexible work, [in:] B. Peper, A. von Doorne-Huiskes, L. den Dulk (eds.), Flexible Working and Organizational Change. The Integration of Work and Personal Life, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Northampton.
  13. Noe R., Hallenbeck J., Gerhart B., Wright P., 2006, Human Resource Management, Gaining a Competitive Advantage, McGraw-Hill Irwin, Boston.
  14. Redpath L., Hurst D., Devine K., 2009, Knowledge workers, managers, and contingent employment relationships, Personnel Review, no. 1, pp. 74-89.
Cited by
Show
ISSN
1899-3192
Language
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.15611/pn.2019.6.10
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu