BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Seroka-Stolka Oksana (Technical University of Częstochowa)
Strategic Environmental Types and Obstacles to the Absorption of Clean Technologies - the Case of Poland
Organization & Management : Scientific Quarterly, 2019, nr 4 (48), s. 87-102, rys., tab., bibliogr. 39 poz.
Zarządzanie strategiczne, Ochrona środowiska
Strategic management, Environmental protection
The adoption of a cleaner production approach to environmental protection has generated the need to identify obstacles affecting the absorption of clean technologies by enterprises with different strategic environmental types in Poland. This research analysis focuses on a sample of industrial firms representing the following industries: food, fuel and energy and chemical. Findings indicate that there are statistical differences between the types of environmental strategies related to the influence of financial and legal obstacles to the absorption of clean technologies. The study also shows that the influence of obstacles on proactive environmental strategies was found to be smaller than on strategies with a lower level of adaptation. (original abstract)
The Library of Warsaw School of Economics
The Library of University of Economics in Katowice
Full text
  1. Acemoglu, D., Akcigit, U., Hanley, D., & Kerr, W. (2016). Transition to clean technology. Journal of Political Economy,124(1), 52-104.
  2. Ar, I.M. (2012). The impact of green product innovation on firm performance and competitive capability: the moderating role of managerial environmental concern. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 854-864. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.144.
  3. Aragón-Correa, J.A., & Rubio-Lopez, E.A. (2007). Proactive corporate environmental strategies: myths and misunderstandings. Long Range Planning, 40(3), 357-381. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2007.02.008.
  4. Baumgartner, R.J., & Zielowski, C. (2007). Analyzing zero emission strategies regarding impact on organizational culture and contribution to sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(13-14), 1321-1327. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.07.016.
  5. Buhl, A., Blazejewski, S., & Dittmer, F. (2016). The more, the merrier: Why and how employee-driven eco-innovation enhances environmental and competitive advantage. Sustainability, 8(9), 946. doi:10.3390/su8090946.
  6. Chang, C.H. (2011). The influence of corporate environmental ethics on competitive advantage: The mediation role of green innovation. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(3), 361-370.
  7. Chang, C.H., & Chen, Y.S. (2013). Green organizational identity and green innovation. Management Decision, 51(5), 1056-1070.
  8. Chen, Y.S. (2008). The positive effect of green intellectual capital on competitive advantages of firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(3), 271-286.
  9. Darley, J.M. & Beniger, J.R. (1981). Diffusion of energy-conserving innovations. Journal of Social Issues, 37(2), 150-171. Retrieved from
  10. Darnall, N., Carmin, J. (2005). Greener and Cleaner? The Signaling Accuracy of U.S. Voluntary Environmental Programs. Policy Sciences, 38(2/3), 71-90.
  11. Del Rio Gonzalez, P. (2005). Analysing the factors influencing clean technology adoption: a study of the Spanish pulp and paper industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 14(1), 20-37.
  12. Dongwon, L. (2003). A Typology of Corporate Environmental Strategy and Its Driving Factors in Multinational Corporation. Los Angeles: University of Southern California.
  13. Driessen, P.H., & Hillebrand, B. (2002). Adoption and diffusion of green innovations. Marketing for sustainability: towards transactional policy-making. In: G.C. Bartels, and W.J.A. Nelissen (Eds.), Marketing for Sustainability: Towards Transactional Policy-Making (pp. 343-55). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  14. Frondel, M., Horbach, J., Rennings, K. (2004). End-of-Pipe or Cleaner Production? An Empirical Comparison of Environmental Innovation Decisions Across OECD Countries. ZEW Discussion Papers, 04-82. Mannheim: Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung (ZEW).
  15. Frondel, M., Horbach, J., Rennings, K. (2007). End-of-Pipe or Cleaner Production? An Empirical Comparison of Environmental Innovation Decisions Across OECD Countries. Business Strategy and the Environment, 16, 8, 571-584.
  16. Garcés-Ayerbe, C., Scarpellini, S., Valero-Gil, J., & Rivera-Torres, P. (2016). Proactive environmental strategy development: from laggard to eco-innovative firms. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 29(7), 1118-1134.
  17. Gluch, P., Gustafsson, M., & Thuvander, L. (2009). An absorptive capacity model for green innovation and performance in the construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 27(5), pp. 451-464. doi: 10.1080/01446190902896645.
  18. Hohmeyer, O., and Koschel, H., (1995). Umweltpolitische Instrumente zur Fo¨rderung des Einsatzes integrierter Umwelttechnik. Final Report of a Study of ZEW commissioned by the Bu¨rofu¨r Technikfolgenabscha¨tzung beim Deutschen Bundestag (TAB). Mannheim, copied manuscript.
  19. Kaźmierczak-Piwko, L., & Graczyk, M. (2012). Rola ekoinnowacji w procesie zrównoważonego rozwoju regionu. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 244, 147-157.
  20. Kemp, R. (1997). Environmental Policy and Technical Change. Cheltenham-Brookfield: Edward Elgar.
  21. Lanoie, P., Laurent-Lucchetti, J., Johnstone, N., & Ambec, S. (2011). Environmental policy, innovation and performance: new insights on the Porter hypothesis. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 20(3), 803-842.
  22. Leszczyńska, A. (2011). Absorpcja innowacji ekologicznych w przedsiębiorstwie. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej, 21.
  23. Long, T.B., Blok, V., & Coninx, I. (2016). Barriers to the adoption and diffusion of technological innovations for climate-smart agriculture in Europe: evidence from the Netherlands, France, Switzerland and Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 9-21.
  24. Moors, E.H., Mulder, K.F., & Vergragt, P.J. (2005). Towards cleaner production: barriers and strategies in the base metals producing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13(7), 657-668.
  25. Murillo-Luna, J.L., Garce´s-Ayerbe, C., & Rivera-Torres, P. (2008), Why do patterns of environmental response differ? A stakeholders pressure approach. Strategic Management Journal, 29(11), 1225-1240,
  26. Murillo-Luna, J.L., Garcés-Ayerbe, C., & Rivera-Torres, P. (2007). What prevents firms from advancing in their environmental strategy? International Advances in Economic Research, 13(1), 35-46. doi: 10.1007/s11294-006-9059-6.
  27. Murillo-Luna, J.L., Garcés-Ayerbe, C., & Rivera-Torres, P. (2011). Barriers to the adoption of proactive environmental strategies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(13), 1417-1425. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.05.005
  28. Post, J.E., & Altman, B.W. (1994). Managing the environmental change process: Barriers and opportunities. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 7(4), 64-81.
  29. Qi, G., Zeng, S., Tam, C., Yin, H., Zou, H. (2013). Stakeholders' influences on corporate green innovation strategy: A case study of manufacturing firms in China. CSR. Environmental Management, 20, 1-14.
  30. Rennings, K. (2000). Redefining innovation-eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 32(2), 319-332.
  31. Roome, N. (1992). Developing environmental management strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 1,11-24. doi: 10.1002/bse.3280010104.
  32. Sandberg, B., & Aarikka-Stenroos, L. (2014). What makes it so difficult? A systematic review on barriers to radical innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(8), 1293-1305.
  33. Seroka-Stolka, O. (2014). The development of green logistics for implementation sustainable development strategy in companies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 151, 302-309. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.028.
  34. Seroka-Stolka, O. (2017). Uwarunkowania proaktywnego podejścia do proekologicznego rozwoju przedsiębiorstwa [Determinants of a proactive approach to pro-environmental enterprise development]. Częstochowa: Wydawnictwo Wydziału Zarządzania Politechniki Częstochowskiej [Faculty of Management of the Czestochowa University of Technology Press], 236-237.
  35. Shi, H., Peng, S.Z., Liu, Y., & Zhong, P. (2008). Barriers to the implementation of cleaner production in Chinese SMEs: government, industry and expert stakeholders' perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(7), 842-852.
  36. Teece, D.J. (1977). Technology transfer by multinational firms: The resource cost of transferring technological know-how. The Economic Journal, 87(346), 242-261.
  37. Teece, D.J. (2003). Technology Transfer by Multinational Firms: The Resource Cost of Transferring Technological Know-How. Essays in Technology Management and Policy: Selected Papers of David J. Teece, no. 262.
  38. Valero-Gil, J., Rivera-Torres, P., & Garcés-Ayerbe, C. (2017). How is environmental proactivity accomplished? Drivers and barriers in firms' pro-environmental change process. Sustainability, 9(8), 1327. doi:10.3390/su9081327.
  39. Zilahy, G. (2004). Organisational factors determining the implementation of cleaner production measures in the corporate sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 12(4), 311-319.
Cited by
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu