BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Author
Johnson Catherine (Missouri University of Science and Technology, USA), Rutter Barbara (Missouri University of Science and Technology, USA), Urban Christopher (Missouri University of Science and Technology, USA), Schott Joseph (Missouri University of Science and Technology, USA), Doucet David (Missouri University of Science and Technology, USA), Moore Chance (Missouri University of Science and Technology, USA), Perry Kyle (Missouri University of Science and Technology, USA)
Title
Small-Scale Testing of Coal Dust Explosion Propagation and Relation to Active Barrier Suppression Systems
Source
New Trends in Production Engineering, 2019, vol. 2(1) cz.I, s. 321-329, rys., bibliogr. 4 poz.
Issue title
Part I: Modern Machines and Technologies for Mining
Keyword
Maszyny i urządzenia, Górnictwo, Bezpieczeństwo i higiena pracy
Machinery and equipment, Mining sector, Health and safety at work
Note
streszcz., summ.
Abstract
Coal dust explosions are a lethal threat to anyone working in an underground coal mine. Many coal mining countries including Australia and much of Europe already utilize passive barrier explosion suppressant systems but due to differences in ventilation patterns in the United States, simple passive systems such as the bagged barrier are not as cost effective. Active systems are triggered by properties of an explosion, such as pressure, heat, or light, and release or project a suppressant into the environment to suppress an explosion. To deploy an active system, the best sensor and suppressant release location and spacing must be determined; this must account for total system latency and explosive propagation speed. A 10:1 model of a longwall entry system has been developed to study the pressure wave propagation of coal dust explosions and consequent triggering of different suppressants. The scaled model, with its removable stoppings, allows multiple potential propagation pathways for an explosion to be repeatedly tested, different from typical straight shock tunnel tests. The layout also facilitates the placement of sensors and cameras to fully observe and document the tests. The pressure wave characteristics found at crosscuts and corners will aid in the development of active barrier trigger systems and spacing of suppressant release locations. (original abstract)
Full text
Show
Bibliography
Show
  1. Hill-Davis, A. (2014) SECURE NIOSH'S LAKE LYNN EXPERIMENTAL MINE Background. Available at: https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.imana.org/resource/dynamic/blogs/20140612_164243_31683.pdf (Accessed: 20 June 2019).
  2. Mc Ateer, J. D. et al. (2011) Upper Big branch. Available at: http://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/96334/upperbigbranchreport.pdf (Accessed: 20 June 2019).
  3. Sapko, M. J. et al. (2000) 'Experimental mine and laboratory dust explosion research at NIOSH', Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. Elsevier, 13 (3-5), pp. 229-242. doi: 10.1016/S0950-4230(99)00038-8.
  4. Schafler, J. R. (2018) Management of coal dust explosions in United States' coal mines using bag type passive explosion barriers. Missouri University of Science and Technology. Available at: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/masters_theses/7782 (Accessed: 19 June 2019).
Cited by
Show
ISSN
2545-2843
Language
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/ntpe-2019-0034
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu