- Author
- Gromada Arkadiusz (Warsaw University of Life Sciences), Wysokiński Marcin (Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW, Poland), Golonko Magdalena (Warsaw University of Life Sciences), Trębska Paulina (Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW, Poland)
- Title
- The Eco-Socio-Economic Level of Development of World Countries - A Comprehensive assessment Proposal
Ekologiczno-społeczno-gospodarczy poziom rozwoju krajów świata - propozycja kompleksowej oceny - Source
- Annals of the Polish Association of Agricultural and Agribusiness Economists, 2020, T. 22, z. 3, s. 86-96, rys., tab., bibliogr. 23 poz.
Roczniki Naukowe Stowarzyszenia Ekonomistów Rolnictwa i Agrobiznesu - Keyword
- Rolnictwo, Ekologia, Ekonomia, Rozwój, Gospodarka
Agriculture, Ecology, Economics, Development, Economy - Note
- JEL Classification: O10, O15, O44, Q01, Q56
streszcz., summ. - Abstract
- Celem głównym artykułu jest ocena rozwoju ekologiczno-społeczno-ekonomicznego krajów świata. Do tego celu zaproponowano i wykorzystano Kompleksowy Wskaźnik Rozwoju Ekologiczno-Społeczno-Gospodarczego (KWRESG). Zaproponowany miernik bazuje na kilkunastu uznanych i stosowanych w literaturze wskaźnikach do oceny państw w zakresie ich społecznych, ekonomicznych i środowiskowych osiągnięć. Podjęto próbę ujęcia większości elementów niezbędnych do bezpiecznego, zdrowego i szczęśliwego życia obywateli badanych krajów. Zaprezentowano światowych liderów, określonych na podstawie wysokości KWRESG. Ponadto przedstawiono poszczególne składowe KWRESG i ich poziom w badanych krajach. Stwierdzono, m.in. że 18 spośród 20 krajów o najwyższym KWRESG to kraje europejskie. Liderami rankingu były wysokorozwinięte kraje skandynawskie (Norwegia, Dania, Finlandia) oraz Szwajcaria. Wysokie pozycje w rankingu zajęły kraje Europy Wschodniej oraz Południowo-Wschodniej (Słowenia, Słowacja, Czechy, Polska i Rumunia), które wyprzedziły takie kraje, jak Kanada, Wielka Brytania, Japonia i Stany Zjednoczone. Wyniki przeprowadzonych badań wskazują, że kraje europejskie i południowoamerykańskie są średnio bardziej rozwinięte pod względem ekologiczno-społeczno-ekonomicznym niż kraje z pozostałych regionów świata.(abstrakt oryginalny)
The main purpose of the article was to assess the eco-socio-economic development of world countries. For this purpose, the Comprehensive Eco-Socio-Economic Development Index (CESEDI) was proposed and used. The proposed measure is based on a dozen or so indicators recognized and used in the literature for assessing countries in terms of their social, economic and environmental achievements. An attempt was made to include most of the elements necessary for the safe, healthy and happy life of citizens of the studied countries. The article presents world leaders, based on the CESEDI. Moreover, the individual components of the CESEDI and their level in the analyzed countries are presented. It was found, inter alia, that 18 out of 20 countries with the highest CESEDI are European countries. The ranking leaders were highly developed Scandinavian countries (Norway, Denmark, Finland) and Switzerland. The countries of Eastern and South-Eastern Europe (Slovenia, Slovakia, the Czech Republic, Poland and Romania) took high positions in the ranking, ahead of such countries as Canada, the United Kingdom, Japan and the United States. Research results indicate that European and South American countries are, on average, more developed in terms of ecological, social and economic development than countries in the rest of the world.(original abstract) - Accessibility
- The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics
The Library of Warsaw School of Economics - Full text
- Show
- Bibliography
- GFN (Global Footprint Network). 2020a. Data and methodology, https://www.footprintnetwork.org/resources/data/, access: 17.07.2020.
- GFN (Global Footprint Network). 2020b. Datasets for Ecological Footprint of Countries, http://data.footprintnetwork.org/?_ga=2.84565849.1179741421.1589881983172787644.1589881983#/compareCountries?cn=all&type=EFCpc&yr=2016, access: 17.07.2020.
- Helliwell John F., Richard Layard, Jeffrey Sachs, Jan-Emmanuel de Neve. 2020. World Happiness Report 2020. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network, https://happiness-report.s3.amazonaws.com/2020/WHR20.pdf, access: 17.07.2020.
- IMF (International Monetary Fund). 2020. Gross Domestic Product: An economy's all. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/basics/gdp.htm, access: 17.07.2020.
- Investopedia. 2020. Gross National Product (GNP), https://www.investopedia.com/terms/g/gnp.asp, access: 17.07.2020.
- Jeffrey Karen, Hanna Wheatley, Saamah Abdallah. 2016. The Happy Planet Index: 2016. A global index of sustainable well-being. London: New Economics Foundation.
- Kraay Aart. 2018. Methodology for a World Bank Human Capital Index, http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/300071537907028892/pdf/WPS8593.pdf, access: 17.07.2020.
- NEW (New Economic Foundation). 2016. Happy Planet Index 2016. Methods Paper, https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5735c421e321402778ee0ce9/t/578dec7837c58157b929b3d6/1468918904805/Methods+paper_2016.pdf, access: 17.07.2020.
- OECD. 2002. Glossary of Statistical Terms. Gross Domestic Product (GDP), https://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=1163, access: 17.07.2020.
- SSF (Sustainable Society Foundation). 2017a. Framework, http://www.ssfindex.com/ssi/framework/, access: 17.07.2020.
- SSF (Sustainable Society Foundation). 2017b. Sustainability and the SSI, http://www.ssfindex.com/ssi/ssi-2016/, access: 17.07.2020.
- SSF (Sustainable Society Foundation). 2017c. Data - all countries. http://www.ssfindex.com/data-all-countries/, access: 17.07.2020.
- Takamori Hiroshi, Shoichi Yamashita. 1973. Measuring socioeconomic development: indicators, development paths, and international comparisons. The Developing Economies 11: 111-145.
- The Balance. 2020. Gross National Income. What it says about a country, https://www.thebalance.com/gross-national-income-4020738#citation-12, access: 17.07.2020.
- UN. 2020. Member States. https://www.un.org/en/member-states/index.html, access: 17.07.2020.
- UNDP. 2019a. Human Development Report 2019. Beyond income, beyond averages, beyond today: Inequalities in human development in the 21st century, http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr_2019_overview_-_english.pdf, access: 17.07.2020.
- UNDP. 2019b. Human Development Report 2019. Technical notes, http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr2019_technical_notes.pdf, access: 17.07.2020.
- UNDP. 2020a. Gender Development Index (GDI), http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/gender-development-index-gdi, access: 17.07.2020.
- UNDP. 2020b. Human Development Index (HDI), http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-hdi, access: 17.07.2020.
- World Bank. 2020a. GDP per capita, PPP (current international $), https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.CD?most_recent_value_desc=true&view=chart, access: 17.07.2020.
- World Bank. 2020b. GNI per capita, PPP (current international $), https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GNP.PCAP.PP.CD?most_recent_value_desc=true, access: 17.07.2020.
- WBG (World Bank Group). 2018. The Human Capital Project, https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/30498/33252.pdf?sequence=5&isAllowed=y, access: 17.07.2020.
- Żołądek Łukasz. 2019. Nie tylko PKB. Alternatywne wskaźniki rozwoju. INFOS Zagadnienia Społeczno-Gospodarcze 12 (265): 1-4.
- Cited by
- ISSN
- 1508-3535
- Language
- eng
- URI / DOI
- http://dx.doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.3615