BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Author
Put Dariusz (Cracow University of Economics, Poland)
Title
E-learning Courses Satisfaction in Higher Education from Participants' Perspective
Zadowolenie z kursów e-learningowych w szkolnictwie wyższym z perspektywy uczestników
Source
Horyzonty Wychowania, 2020, vol. 19, nr 51, s. 23-32, rys., tab., bibliogr. 15 poz.
Horizons of Education
Issue title
Internacjonalizacja szkolnictwa wyższego oraz edukacji dla przedsiębiorczości
Keyword
Edukacja, Zdalne nauczanie, Szkolnictwo wyższe, Wychowanie
Education, e-learning, Higher education, Parenting
Note
streszcz., summ.
Abstract
RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper is to evaluate usefulness of distance learning courses as a form of learning from participants' perspective. THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: To achieve the purpose, two research methods have been employed: literature review, including rules and regulations concerning distance learning courses, and analysis of the results of a survey conducted among students participating in distance learning course as well as own observations and experiences. THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: In the paper it is analysed, how students perceive elearning courses comparing to traditional ones. First, selected Polish Minister of Higher Education and the Senate of Cracow University of Economics (CUE) regulations under which CUE teachers may conduct distance learning courses are presented. Second, the procedure for the preparation of elearning courses at CUE is described. The roles played by individual actors during the preparation of the course are discussed. Next, selected results of the survey conducted among course participants are presented. Finally, conclusions and observations are discussed. Results of the survey confirm that e-learning is a promising type of teaching supporting traditional lessons. RESEARCH RESULTS: A considerable number of participants found this kind of didactic process useful and attractive. However, an unexpectedly large number stated that they expected more traditional lessons. CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The analysis allows to draw interesting conclusions concerning the necessity of selection of participants, problem of systematic work, methods of evaluation, personal contact with a teacher, preparation of teaching materials. All of them will be taken under consideration to improve the course for future participants.(original abstract)
Accessibility
The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics
Full text
Show
Bibliography
Show
  1. Al-Samarraire, H., et al. (2018). E-Learning Continuance Satisfaction in Higher Education: A Unified Perspective from Instructors and Students. Studies in Higher Education, 43:11, 2003-2019.
  2. Chow, A.S., & Croxton, R.A. (2017). Designing a Responsive e-Learning Infrastructure: Systemic Change in Higher Education. American Journal of Distance Education, vol. 31(1), 20-42.
  3. Decree of Minister of Science and Higher Education on the use of distance learning methods and techniques in the teaching process. Warsaw, 25 September 2007 (Dz. U. 2007, no. 188, pos. 1347)
  4. Ehlers, U.D., Goertz, L., Hildebrandt, B., & Pawlowski, J.M. (2005). Quality in elearning. Use and dissemination of quality approaches in European e-learning. A study by the European Quality Observatory. European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop), Panorama series, 116, Luxembourg.
  5. Hadining A.F., Sukanta, & Hidayat WA. (2019). An Investigation of Student Perspective for e- Learning Readiness Measurement. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Bangkok, Thailand, March 5-7.
  6. Kaleci, D., & Akleman, E. (2019). Assessment of Knowledge and Confidence for E-Learning. World Journal on Educational Technology, vol. 11(1), 104-115.
  7. Keskin, S., & Yurdugül, H. (2019). Factors affecting students' preferences for online and blended learning: motivational vs. cognitive. European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, vol. 22(2), 72-86.
  8. Khan, M.L.H., & Setiavan, A. (2019). The Impact of e-learning on Higher Education Perception, Skills, Critical Thinking and Satisfaction. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1375, Annual Conference of Science and Technology, 30 August 2018, Malang, Indonesia.
  9. Lee, S.S., & Wella, W. (2019). Analisis Technology Acceptance Model Penggunaan ELearning pada Mahasiswa. ULTIMA InfoSys, vol. IX(2), 70-78.
  10. Morais, E., Morais, C., Paiva, J. (2014). Myths and Realities of E-Learning: Exploratory Survey of Higher Education Students. E-Learning and Digital Media, vol. 11(3), 300-313.
  11. Naidu, S. (2006). E-Learning. A Guidebook of Principles, Procedures and Practices. Commonwealth Educational Media Centre for Asia, 2nd edition, New Delhi.
  12. Resolution of the Senate of Cracow University of Economics, no. 14/2009, Cracow, 25 May 2009.
  13. Shroff, R., Deneen, C., & Ng E.M.W. (2011). Analysis of the technology acceptance model in examining students' behavioural intention to use an e-portfolio system. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 27(4), 600-618.
  14. Srivastava, P. (2018). Advantages & Disadvantages of E-Education & E-Learning. Journal of Retail Marketing & Distribution, vol. 2(3), 22-27.
  15. Zakariah, Z., et al. (2012). E-Learning Awareness in a Higher Learning Institution in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 67, 621-625.
Cited by
Show
ISSN
2391-9485
Language
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.35765/hw.1898
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu