BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Author
Vaitkienė Dana (Vilnius University, Šiauliai Academy, Lithuania), Juknevičienė Vita (Vilnius University, Šiauliai Academy, Lithuania), Poškuvienė Beatričė (Vilnius University, Šiauliai Academy, Lithuania)
Title
The Usage of Social Networks for Citizen Engagement at the Local Self-government Level: the Link between Municipal Councillors and Citizens
Source
Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 2021, vol. 9, no. 2, s. 111-130, tab., wykr., bibliogr. 48 poz.
Keyword
Serwisy społecznościowe, Samorząd terytorialny, Partycypacja społeczna, Zaangażowanie obywateli
Social networking, Local government, Social participation, Citizen involvement
Note
summ.
Company
Facebook
Facebook
Abstract
Social networks perform a highly important role in public governance, especially in its communication processes, since they are an alternative to usual methods of communication and the dissemination of information, and it is becoming easier and quicker to publicise the political content, to receive feedback, and to form one's opinion. Citizens can express their viewpoints on issues which are relevant to selfgovernment, whereas representatives of the municipality can inform citizens about activities and ongoing changes, seek the support of citizens, and pursue their political career goals. The purpose of this research is to reveal how social networks can be employed for citizen engagement at the local self-government level, by identifying the characteristics of the link between municipal councillors and citizens. The research employed both quantitative and qualitative research approaches, using methods such as the content analysis of 335 account entries (posts) on the social network Facebook by four municipal councillors and semi-structured interviews with said councillors. The empirical research demonstrates that municipal councillors use their Facebook accounts to disseminate information on important matters of local self-government, raising questions which are relevant to society, and receiving feedback from citizens (assessment of problems, suggested solutions); however, there is a lack of other kinds of engagement of citizens, i.e. institutional (applied by a municipality), via Facebook, even though there are possibilities available for not only the dissemination of information but also for discussions and the submission of suggestions via social networks. (original abstract)
Accessibility
The Library of Warsaw School of Economics
Full text
Show
Bibliography
Show
  1. Alarabiat, A., Soares, D., Estevez, E. (2021), Determinants of citizens' intention to engage in government-led electronic participation initiatives through Facebook, Government Information Quarterly, 38(1), 1-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2020.101537.
  2. Aurylaitë, I. (2017), The Empowerment of Local Government to Involve the Citizens into Political Decision-Making Process to Use the Social Network "Facebook", Public Policy and Administration, 16(1), 68-80. DOI: 10.5755/j01.ppaa.16.1.18014.
  3. Aurylaitë, I. (2019), Interaction between local governance and citizens on social network Facebook: the case of Lithuanian municipalities, Doctoral dissertation, Kaunas University of Technology, Lithuania, retrieved from: https://epubl.ktu.edu/object/elaba:45135832/ (accessed 26 February 2021).
  4. Bojic, I., Marra, G., Naydenova, V. (2016), Online tools for public engagement: Case studies from Reykjavik, ArXiv, abs/1611.08981, retrieved from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.08981 (accessed 26 February 2021).
  5. Bonsón, E., Royo, S., Ratkai, M. (2017), Facebook practices in Western European municipalities: An empirical analysis of activity and citizens' engagement, Administration & Society, 49(3), 320-347. DOI: 10.1177/0095399714544945.
  6. Bučinskas, A., Raipa, A., Giedraitytë, V. (2012), The Decomposition of Innovative Process Management in the Public Sector: Methodological Aspects, Bridges, 59(2), 1-14. DOI: 10.15181/tbb.v59i2.401.
  7. Calder, M.J., Beckie, M.A. (2011), Engaging communities in municipal sustainability planning: the use of communication strategies and social networks in Alberta, Local Environment, 16(7), 671-686. DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2011.589432.
  8. Campbell, D.E. (2013), Social networks and political participation, Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 33-48. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-033011-201728.
  9. Charalabidis, Y., Loukis, E.N., Androutsopoulou, A., Karkaletsis, V., Triantafillou, A. (2014), Passive crowdsourcing in government using social media, Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 8(2), 283-308. DOI: 10.1108/TG-09-2013-0035.
  10. Chow, I.H.S. (2008), How trust reduces transaction costs and enhances performance in China's businesses, SAM Advanced Management Journal, 73(2), 25-34.
  11. Costopoulou, C., Ntaliani, M., Ntalianis, F. (2021), Evolution of e-participation in Greek local government, Information Polity, 1-15. DOI: 10.3233/IP-190174.
  12. Darebin City Council (2020), Councillor Media and Social Media Policy, retrieved from: http://www.darebin.vic.gov.au/-/media/cityofdarebin/Files/YourCouncil/HowCouncil Works/MeetingAgendasMinutes/CouncilMeetings/2020/24-Feb/ Item804AppendixA-Councillor-MediaandSocialMediaPolicy2020-02.ashx?la=en (accessed 26 February 2021).
  13. Deseriis, M. (2020), Rethinking the digital democratic affordance and its impact on political representation: Toward a new framework, New Media & Society, 22, 1-22. DOI: 10.1177/1461444820929678.
  14. Garau, C. (2012), Focus on citizens: Public engagement with online and face-toface participation - A case study, Future Internet, 4(2), 592-606. DOI: 10.3390/fi4020592.
  15. Grunda, R., Bartkus, E. V., Raipa, A. (2011), Assessment of Models and Indicators of Private and Public Organization Sustainability, Public Policy and Administration, 10(4), 565-576.
  16. Haro-de-Rosario, A., Sáez-Martín, A., del Carmen Caba-Pérez, M. (2018), Using social media to enhance citizen engagement with local government: Twitter or Facebook?, New Media & Society, 20(1), 29-49. DOI: 10.1177/1461444816645652.
  17. Howard, P. N., Savage, S., Saviaga, C. F., Toxtli, C., Monroy-Hernández, A. (2016), Social media, civic engagement, and the slacktivism hypothesis: Lessons from Mexico's "El Bronco", Journal of International Affairs, 70(1), 55-73.
  18. Katsonis, M. (2019), Designing effective public engagement: The case study of Future Melbourne 2026, Policy Design and Practice, 2(2), 215-228. DOI: 10.1080/25741292.2019.1621032.
  19. Kuc-Czarnecka, M. (2020), COVID-19 and digital deprivation in Poland, Oeconomia Copernicana, 11, 415-431. DOI: 10.24136/oc.2020.017.
  20. Kwon, O., Wen, Y. (2010), An empirical study of the factors affecting social network service use, Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 254-263. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2009.04.011.
  21. Lithuanian Free Market Institute (2016), Municipal Performance Index, retrieved from: https://www.llri.lt/tyrimai/lietuvossavivaldybiu-indeksas/lietuvos-savivaldybiu-indeksas-2016/siauliu-m-savivaldybe-2016 (accessed 3 October 2020).
  22. Lodewijckx, I. (2019), What is the Difference between Citizen Engagement and Participation?, retrieved from: https://www.citizenlab.co/blog/civic-engagement/what-is-the-difference-betweencitizen-engagement-and-participation/ (accessed 9 October 2020).
  23. Marcinkevičiűtë, L., Petrauskienë, R. (2008), Possibilities of Citizens` Participation in Management of Public Administration Institutions: Cases of Vilnius and Jurbarkas District Municipalities, Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 14(3), 102-109.
  24. Masiya, T., Davids, Y.D., Mazenda, A. (2019), Effective public participation in municipal service delivery: the case of Nyanga township, Administratio Publica, 3(27), 27-47. http://hdl.handle.net/2263/71494 (accessed 26 February 2021).
  25. Maximova, O.B., Lukyanova, G.O. (2020), Gender differences online: Self-representation and involvement in political communication on Facebook, Heliyon, 6(12), 1-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05613.
  26. Mazurek, G., Korzyński, P., Górska, A. (2019), Social media in the marketing of higher education institutions in Poland: Preliminary empirical studies, Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 7(1), 117-133. DOI: 10.15678/EBER.2019.070107.
  27. McClurg, S.D. (2003), The Role of Social Networks in Ex-plaining Political Participation, Political Research Quarterly, 56(4), 449-464. DOI: 10.1177/106591290305600407.
  28. McClurg, S.D. (2006), The electoral relevance of political talk: Examining disagreement and expertise effects in social networks on political participation, American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 737-754. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00213.x.
  29. Michels, A., De Graaf, L. (2017), Examining citizen participation: Local participatory policymaking and democracy revisited, Local Government Studies, 43(6), 875-881. DOI: 10.1080/03003930.2017.1365712.
  30. Nadanyiova, M., Gajanova, L., Majerova, J., Lizbetinova, L. (2020), Influencer marketing and its impact on consumer lifestyles, Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 8(2), 109-120. https://doi.org/10.23762/FSO_VOL8_NO2_7
  31. Office of the Integrity Commissioner (2016), Interpretation Bulletin, Code of Conduct for Members of Council. Use of Social Media by Members of Council, Toronto, retrieved from: https://www.toronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/94e1-IC_SocialMedia CouncilMembers.pdf (accessed 26 February 2021).
  32. Polat, R. K. (2012), Digital exclusion in Turkey: A policy perspective, Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 589-596. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2012.03.002.
  33. Repo, P., Matschoss, K. (2019), Considering expert takeovers in citizen involvement processes, Journal of Responsible Innovation, 6(2), 119-142. DOI: 10.1080/23299460.2019.1568145.
  34. Roengtam, S., Nurmandi, A., Almarez, D. N., Kholid, A. (2017), Does social media transform city government? A case study of three ASEAN cities Bandung, Indonesia, Iligan, Philippines and Phuket, Thailand, Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 11(3), 343-376. DOI: 10.1108/TG-10-2016-0071.
  35. Schauer, P. (2015), 5 Biggest Differences between Social Media and Social Networking, retrieved from: https://www.socialmediatoday.com/social-business/peteschauer/2015-06-28/5-biggest-differences-between-social-media-andsocial (accessed 11 October 2020).
  36. Sideri, M., Kitsiou, A., Filippopoulou, A., Kalloniatis, C., Gritzalis, S. (2019), E-Governance in educational settings: Greek educational organizations leadership's perspectives towards social media usage for participatory decision-making, Internet Research, 29(4), 818-845. DOI: 10.1108/IntR-05-2017-0178.
  37. Skoric, M.M., Zhu, Q., Goh, D., Pang, N. (2015), Social media and citizen engagement: A meta-analytic review, New Media & Society, 18(9), 1817-1839. DOI: 10.1177/1461444815616221.
  38. Skulme, R., Praude, V. (2016), Social media evaluation metrics, Oeconomia Copernicana, 7(1), 131-142. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/219719.
  39. Sroka, W. (2011), Problem of trust in alliance networks, Organizacija, 44(4), 101-108. DOI: 10.2478/v10051-011-0010-0.
  40. Smalskys, V., Šilinskytė, A. (2016), Public Involvement at a Local Self-Government Level in the Context of Open Data, Public Policy and Administration, 15(4), 641-656. DOI: 10.13165/VPA-16-15-4-09.
  41. Stapper, E.W., Van der Veen, M., Janssen-Jansen, L.B. (2020), Consultants as intermediaries: Their perceptions on citizen involvement in urban development, Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 38(1):60-78. DOI: 10.1177/2399654419853583.
  42. Stasiukynas, A. (2010), Public Participation in the Governance of the Lithuanian Electrical Energy Sector, Public Policy and Administration, 32, 104-119.
  43. The Corporation of the City of Brantford (2020), Code of Conduct for Members of the Council of the Corporation of the City of Brantford and of its Local Boards - Use of Social Media, retrieved from: https://pub-brantford.escribemeetings.com/filestream.ashx?DocumentId=5003 (accessed 26 February 2021).
  44. Toleikienë, R., Rybnikova, I., Juknevičienë, V. (2020), Whether and how does the Crisis-Induced Situation Change e-Leadership in the Public Sector? Evidence from Lithuanian Public Administration, Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 16(SI), 149-166. DOI: 10.24193/tras.SI2020.9.
  45. Tretiakova, I. (2016), Study of peculiarities of social network using depending on personal psychological well-being, Bridges, 74(2), 143-150. DOI: 10.15181/tbb.v74i2.1372.
  46. Vaidelytë, E., Țilinskas, G., Rauleckas, R. (2016), Theory Definitions of Citizen Inclusion into Public Governance, Public Security and Public Order, 16, 253-268.
  47. Veerasamy, V. (2020), Social Media vs. Social Networking: What's The Difference?, retrieved from: https://www.referralcandy.com/blog/difference-between-socialnetworks-and-social-media/ (accessed 11 October 2020).
  48. Wamsler, C., Alkan-Olsson, J., Björn, H., Falck, H., Hanson, H., Oskarsson, T., Simonsson, E., Zelmerlow, F. (2020), Beyond participation: When citizen engagement leads to undesirable outcomes for nature-based solutions and climate change adaptation, Climatic Change, 158(2), 235-254. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-019-02557-9.
Cited by
Show
ISSN
2300-5947
Language
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.23762/FSO_VOL 9_NO 2_6
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu