BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Author
Lobão Júlio (University of Porto)
Title
Culture, Learning and Rational Decision-Making : Evidence from a TV Show
Decyzje uczestników teleturnieju : różnice kulturowe, racjonalność i uczenie się
Source
Decyzje, 2020, nr 34, s. 5-27, rys., tab., bibliogr. 40 poz.
Keyword
Podejmowanie decyzji, Uczenie się, Racjonalność, Zróżnicowanie kulturowe
Decision making, Studying, Rationality, Cultural diversity
Note
streszcz., summ.
Country
Wietnam, Francja
Vietnam, France
Abstract
W artykule przeanalizowano francuską i wietnamską wersję teleturnieju The Price is Right, korzystając z danych ze 130 odcinków. Skupiono się na grze licytacyjnej obejmującej 434 rundy i 1736 ofert. Udokumentowano, że gracze znacznie odbiegają od tego, co przewiduje model racjonalnych oczekiwań, zwłaszcza w populacji francuskiej. Ponadto okazało się, że czwarty oferent w Wietnamie wygrywa częściej niż we Francji, mimo że rzadziej stosuje optymalne strategie. Wyniki te można przypisać przyczynom kulturowym. Uczestnicy z kolektywistycznej kultury tolerującej niepewność (tj. z Wietnamu) są bardziej niechętni do podejmowania strategicznych przetargów niż osoby z kultury indywidualistycznej, unikającej niepewności (czyli z Francji). Jednak wietnamscy zawodnicy zwracają większą uwagę na szacunki poprzednich graczy i dzięki temu lepiej wykorzystują przewagę informacyjną związaną z sekwencyjnym charakterem gry. Zebrane dowody ogólnie sugerują, że kultura jest ważną, lecz pomijaną zmienną w badaniach dotyczących różnic między krajami w podejmowaniu decyzji. (abstrakt oryginalny)

This paper analyzes the French and the Vietnamese versions of the TV game show "The Price is Right", using data from 130 episodes. We focus on the bidding game, covering 434 rounds and 1,736 bids. We document that players deviate significantly from what is predicted by the model of rational expectations, especially in the French population. Moreover, Vietnamese fourth bidders are found to win more frequently than their French counterparts in spite of using strategic bids less often. We attribute these results to cultural reasons. Contestants from the collectivistic, uncertainty-tolerant culture (i.e., Vietnam) are more reluctant to engage in strategic bidding than individuals from the individualistic, uncertainty-avoidant culture (i.e., France). However, Vietnamese contestants pay more attention to the estimates of the previous players and thus make a better use of the informational advantage inherent to the sequential nature of the game. Overall, our evidence suggests that culture is an important omitted variable in studies that examine cross-country differences in decision-making. (original abstract)
Full text
Show
Bibliography
Show
  1. Antonovics, K., Arcidiacono, P., & Walsh R. (2005). Games and Discrimination: Lessons From the Weakest Link. Journal of Human Resources, 40, 918-947.
  2. Bae, S.C., Chang, K., & Kang, E. (2012). Culture, Corporate Governance, and Dividend Policy: International Evidence. Journal of Financial Research, 35, 289-316.
  3. Bennett, R.W., & Hickman, K.A. (1993). Rationality and the 'price is right'. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 21, 99-105.
  4. Berk, J.B., Hughson, E., & Vandezande, K. (1996). The Price is Right, But Are the Bids? An Investigation of Rational Decision Theory. American Economic Review, 86, 954-970.
  5. Chang, L., Mak, M.C.K., Wu, B.P., Chen, B.B., & Lu, H.J. (2011). Cultural Adaptations to Environmental Variability: An Evolutionary Account of East-West Differences. Educational Psychological Review, 23, 99-129.
  6. Chui, A., Titman, S., & Wei, J. (2010). Individualism and Momentum around the World. Journal of Finance, 65, 361-392.
  7. Daniel, K., Hirshleifer, D., & Subrahmanyam, A. (1998). Investor Psychology and Security Market under- and Overreactions. Journal of Finance, 53, 1839-1885.
  8. Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (Eds.) (2002). Bounded Rationality: The Adaptative Toolbox. MIT Press.
  9. Gigerenzer, G., Hertwig, R., & Pachur, T. (Eds.) (2015). Heuristics: The Foundation of Adaptive Behavior. Oxford University Press.
  10. Guiso, L., Poala, S., & Zingales, L. (2006). Does culture affect economic outcomes? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 23-48.
  11. Gurevich, G., & Kliger, D. (2013). The Manipulation: Socio-economic decision making. Journal of Economic Psychology, 39, 171-184.
  12. Hartley, R., Lanot, G., & Walker, I. (2014). Who Really Wants to Be a Millionaire? Estimates of Risk Aversion from Gameshow Data. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 29, 861-879.
  13. Healy, P., & Noussair, C. (2004). Bidding behavior in the 'price is right' game: an experimental study. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 54, 231-247.
  14. Henrich, J. (2000). Does Culture Matter in Economic Behavior? Ultimatum Game Bargaining Among the Machiguenga of the Peruvian Amazon. American Economic Review, 90, 973-979.
  15. Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., & McElreath, R. (2001). In Search of Homo Economicus: Behavioral Experiments in 15 Small-Scale Societies. American Economic Review, 91, 73-78.
  16. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  17. Hofstede, G. (1986). Cultural Differences in Teaching and Learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10, 301-320.
  18. Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing Cultures: the Hofstede Model in Context. Online readings in psychology and culture, 2, p. 8.
  19. Hofstede Insights (2020). Compare countries. Available at: https://www.hofstede-insights.com/product/compare-countries/ (accessed 23 January 2020).
  20. Hofstede, G., & Bond, M.H. (1988). The Confucius connection: from cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16, 4-21.
  21. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (Rev. 3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  22. International Monetary Fund (2018). World Economic Outlook: Challenges to Steady Growth. World Economic and Financial Surveys.
  23. Ji, L., & Yap, S. (2016). Culture and cognition. Current Opinion in Psychology, 8, 105111.
  24. Ji, L., Guo, T., Zhang, Z., & Messervey, D. (2009). Looking Into the Past: Cultural Differences in Perception and Representation of Past Information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 761-769.
  25. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-292.
  26. Keldenich, K., & Klemm, M. (2014). Double or nothing?! Small group decisions under risk in "Quiz Taxi". Theory and Decision, 77, 243-274.
  27. Kvam, P.H. (2018) A Probability Model for Strategic Bidding on "The Price is Right". Decision Analysis, 15, 195-207.
  28. LeFebvre, R., & Franke, V. (2013). Culture Matters: Individualism vs. Collectivism in Confl ict Decision-Making. Societies, 3, 128-146.
  29. Levitt, S.D. (2004). Testing Theories of Discrimination: Evidence from Weakest Link. Journal of Law and Economics, 47, 431-452.
  30. Lu, L., Rose, G.M., & Blodgett, J.G. (1999). The Effects of Cultural Dimensions on Ethical Decision Making in Marketing: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Business Ethics, 18, 91-105.
  31. Mann, L., Radford, M., Burnett, P., Ford, S., Bond, M., Leung, K., Nakamura, H., Vaughan, G. & Yang, K. (1998). Cross-cultural Differences in Self-reported Decision-making Style and Confidence. International Journal of Psychology, 33, 325-335.
  32. Markus, H.R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and self: Implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
  33. Minkov, M. (2007). What makes us different and similar: A new interpretation of the World Values Survey and other cross-cultural data. Sofia, Bulgaria: Klasika i Stil.
  34. Nettle, D. (2009). Beyond nature versus culture: cultural variation as an evolved characteristic. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 15, 223-240.
  35. Ohbuchi, K., Fukushima, O., & Tedeschi, J. (1999). Cultural Values in Confl ict Management: Goal Orientation, Goal Attainment, and Tactical Decision. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 51-71.
  36. Olsen, R. (2011). Financial Risk Perceptions: A Behavioral Perspective. In R. Yazdipour (Ed.), Advances in Entrepreneurial Finance: With Applications from Behavioral Finance and Economics (pp. 45-68). Springer.
  37. Schkade, L.L., Romani, S., & Uzawa, M. (1978). Human information processing and environmental complexity: an experiment in four cultures. ASCI Journal of Management, 8, 56-63.
  38. Van Dolder, D., Van den Assem, M.J., Camerer, C., & Thaler, R.H. (2015). Standing United or Falling Divided? High Stakes Bargaining in a TV Game Show. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 105, 402-407.
  39. Tenorio, R., & Cason, T.N. (2002). To spin or not to spin? Natural and laboratory experiments from 'the price is right'. Economic Journal, 112, 170-195.
  40. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions. Journal of Business, 59, 251-278.
Cited by
Show
ISSN
1733-0092
Language
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.144
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu