BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Author
Erdogan Hande (Akdeniz University, Turkey), Tosun Nedret (Akdeniz University, Turkey)
Title
Evaluation of Sustainable Supplier Problem: a Hybrid Decision Making Model Based on Swara-Waspas
Source
LogForum, 2021, vol. 17, nr 4, s. 465-476, rys., tab., bibliogr. 43 poz.
Keyword
Zrównoważony łańcuch dostaw, Wielokryterialne podejmowanie decyzji, Rynek globalny
Sustainable supply chain, Multiple-criteria decision making, Global market
Note
summ.
Abstract
Background: The fierce competitive advantage in the global market depends largely on the integration of all supply chain networks. This network facilitates the movement of information and materials through the suppliers and end customers with a focus on planning and managing. This integration can result in the meeting demands of customer orders being affected by the performance of the suppliers. As a result of this integration, it can be considered that the performance of the suppliers is important in fulfilling customer orders on time. Evaluating and selecting suppliers is greatly influencing the performance of the supply network. Methods: Selecting the proper supplier is a multi-criteria decision-making problem which includes both quantitative and qualitative criteria. A two-stage decision making method is proposed in the study under sustainability dimension. First, SWARA method is used to determine the relative importance of criteria and than WASPAS method is used to evaluate and rank the given alternatives. Results: A real-life case study is given for the selected approach. Also, sensitivity analysis is given. This selected alternative confirms the preferences of decision makers as it is a company that operates internationally and has a reputation and awareness in sustainability within its own country. Conclusions: Due to the increase in awareness on sustainability and the resulting regulations, the issue of sustainability in supply chains and sustainable supplier selection has become an important issue for companies. It is aimed to examine the supplier selection of a company in an electronics sector on a "sustainable" basis, considering from economic, environmental and social aspects. In this study, which was carried out to fill the literature gap identified in this field and to propose a systematic approach to sustainable supplier selection, a hybrid method which consists of both SWARA and WASPAS method have been used to evaluate the suppliers under the sustainability dimensions. With the help of a hybrid model, decision makers can manage conflict management of individual challenges using an analytical process. (original abstract)
Full text
Show
Bibliography
Show
  1. Abdel-Baset M., Chang V., Gamal A., Smarandache F., 2019. An integrated neutrosophic ANP and VIKOR method for achieving sustainable supplier selection: A case study in importing field. Computers in Industry, 106, 94-110. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2018.12.017.
  2. Ahmadi H.B., Petrudi S.H.H., Wang X, 2017, Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with analytical hierarchy proces and improved grey relational analysis: A case of telecom industry. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 90, 2413-2427. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9518-z
  3. Alrasheedi M., Mardani A., Mishra A.R., Rani P., Loganathan N., 2021, An extended. framework to evaluate sustainable suppliers in manufacturing companies using a new pythagorean fuzzy entropy-SWARAWASPAS decision-making approach. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, http://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-07-2020-0263
  4. Amindoust A., Ahmed S., Saghafinia A., Bahreininejad A., 2012. Sustainable supplier selection: A ranking model based on fuzzy inference system. Applied Soft Computing, 12, 1668-1677. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2012.01.023
  5. Amindoust A., Saghafinia A., 2017. Textile supplier selection in sustainable supply chain using a modular fuzzy inference system model. TEXT Institute, 108, 1250-1258. http://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2016.1238130
  6. Awasthi A., Govindan K., Gold S., 2018. Multitier sustainable global supplier using a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 195, 106-117. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.013
  7. Azadi M., Saen R.F., 2012. Developing a worst practice DEA model for selecting suppliers in the presence of imprecise data and dual-role factor. International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 5, 272-291. http://doi.org/10.1504/IJADS.2012.047671
  8. Azadnia A.H., Saman M.Z.M., Wong K.Y., Ghadimi P., Zakuan N., 2012. Sustainable supplier selection based on self-organizing map neural network and multi criteria decision making approaches. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65, 879-884. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.214
  9. Azadnia A.H., Saman M.Z.M., Wong K.Y., 2015, Sustainable supplier selection and order lot-sizing: an integrated multiobjective decision-making process. International Journal of Production Research, 53, 383-403. http://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.935827
  10. Bai C., Kusi-Sarpong S., Ahmadi H.B., Sarkis J., 2019, Social sustainable supplier evaluation and selection: a group decisionsupport approach. International Journal of Production Research, 57, 7046-7067. http://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1574042
  11. Büyüközkan G., Çifçi G., 2011, A novel fuzzy multi-criteria decision framework for sustainable supplier selection with incomplete information. Computers in Industry, 62, 164-174. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2010.10.009
  12. Carter C., Rogers D., 2008, A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38, 360-387. http://doi.org/10.1108/09600030810882816
  13. Carter C.R., Easton P.L., 2011, Sustainable supply chain management: Evolution and future directions. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41, 46-62. http://doi.org/10.1108/09600031111101420
  14. Cheraghalipour A., Farsad S., 2018. A biobjective sustainable supplier selection and order allocation considering quantity discounts under disruption risks: A case study in plastic industry. Computers in Industry, 118, 237-250. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.02.041
  15. Ghadimi P., Heavey C., 2014, Sustainable supplier selection in medical device industry: toward sustainable manufacturing. Procedia CIRP Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, 15, 165-170. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.06.096
  16. Ghadimi P., Dargi A., Heavey C., 2017. Sustainable supplier performance scoring using audition check-list based fuzzy inference system: A case application in automotive spare part industry. Computers in Industry, 105, 12-27. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.01.002
  17. Girubha J., Vinodh S., Kek V., 2016. Application of interpretative structural modelling integrated multi criteria decision making methods for sustainable supplier selection. Journal of Modelling in Management, 11, 358-388. http://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-02-2014-0012
  18. Goren H.G., 2018, A decision framework for sustainable supplier selection and order allocation with lost sales. Journal of Cleaner Production, 183, 1156-1169. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.211
  19. Govindan K., Khodaverdi R., Jafarian A., 2013. A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 345-354. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.04.014
  20. Hashim M., Nazam M., Yao L., Baig S.A., Abrar M., Ziar-ur-Rehman M., 2017, Application of multi-objective optimization based on genetic algorithm for sustainable strategic supplier selection under fuzzy environment. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 10, 188-212.
  21. Hollos D., Blome C., Foerstl K., 2011. Does sustainable supplier co-operation affect performance? Examining implications for the triple bottom line. International Journal of Production Research, 50, 2968-2986. http://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.582184
  22. Jamali G., Farrokhnejad K.H., Mohammadi M., 2015. Decision making on analyzing advanced manufacturing systems dimensions: SWARA and COPRAS_G integration (case study: automotive industry). Buletin Teknologi Tanaman, 12, 266-274.
  23. Kannan D., 2018. Role of multiple stakeholders and the critical success factor theory for the sustainable supplier selection process. International Journal of Production Economics, 195, 391-418. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.02.020
  24. Kersuliene V., Zavadskas E.K., Turksis Z., 2010. Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis (Swara). Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11, 243-258. http://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2010.12
  25. Liu A., Xiao Y., Lu H., Tsai S.B., Song W., 2019. A fuzzy three-stage multi-attribute decision-making approach based on customer needs for sustainable supplier selection. Journal of Cleaner Production, 239, 1-16. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118043
  26. Lu H., Jiang S., Song W., Ming X., 2018. A rough multi-criteria decision-making approach for sustainable supplier selection under vague environment. Sustainability, 10, 1-20.
  27. Luthra S., Govindan K., Kannan D., Mangla S.K., Garg C.P., 2017. An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 1686-1698. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.078
  28. Matici B., Jovanovic S., Das D.K., Zavadskas E.K., Stevic Z., Sremac S., Marinkovic M., 2019. A new hybrid MCDM model: sustainable supplier selection in a construction company. Symmetry, 11, 1-24.
  29. Mavi R.K., Goh M., Zarbakhshnia N., 2017. Sustainable third-party reverse logistic provider selection with fuzzy SWARA and fuzzy MOORA in plastic industry. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 91, 2401-2418. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9880-x
  30. Mehregan M.R., Hashemi S.H., Karimi A., Merikhi B, 2014, Analysis of interactions among sustainability supplier selection criteria using ISM and fuzzy DEMATEL. International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 7, 270-294. http://doi.org/10.1504/IJADS.2014.063226
  31. Memari A., Dargi A., Jokar M.R.A. Ahmad, R., Rahim A.R.A., 2019. Sustainable supplier selection: A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 50, 9-24. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.11.002
  32. Mohammed A., Setchi R., Filip M., Harris I., Li X., 2018. An integrated methodology for a sustainable two-stage supplier selection and order allocation problem. Journal of Cleaner Production, 192, 99-114. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.131
  33. Mohammed A., Harris I., Govindan K., 2019. A hybrid MCDM-FMOO approach for sustainable supplier selection and order allocation. International Journal of Production Economics, 217, 171-184. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.02.003
  34. Phochanikorn P., Tan C., 2019. A new extension to a multi-criteria decisionmaking model for sustainable supplier selection under an intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Sustainability, 2019, 11, 1-24.
  35. Pishchulov G., Trautrims A., Chesney T., Gold S., Schwab L., 2019. The voting analytic hierarchy process revisited: A revised method with application to sustainable supplier selection. International Journal of Production Economics, 211, 166-179. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.01.025
  36. Rabieh M., Rafsanjani A.F., Babaei L., Esmaeili M., 2019. Sustainable supplier selection and order allocation: An integrated delphi method, fuzzy TOPSIS and multi-objective programming model. Scientia Iranica, 26, 2524-2540.
  37. Segura M., Maroto C., Segura B., 2019. Quantifying the sustainability of products and suppliers in food distribution companies. Sustainability, 11, 1-18.
  38. Stevic Z., Durmic E., Gajic M., Pamucar D., Puska A., 2019. A novel multi-criteria decision-making model: Interval rough SAW method for sustainable supplier selection. Information, 10, 1-21. http://doi.org/10.3390/info10100292
  39. Stevic Z., Pamucar D., Puska A., Chatterjee P., 2020. Sustainable supplier selection in healthcare industries using a new MCDM method: Measurement of alternatives and ranking according to compromise solution (MARCOS). Computers in Industry, 140, 1-15. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106231
  40. Tavana M., Yazdani M., Di Caprio D., 2017. An application of an integrated ANP-QFD framework for sustainable supplier selection. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 20, 254-275. http://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2016.1219702
  41. Tirkolaee E.B., Mardani A., Dashtian Z., Soltani M., Weber G.H., 2020. A novel hybrid method using fuzzy decision making and multi-objective programming for sustainable-reliable supplier selection in two-echolon supply chain design. Journal of Cleaner Production, 250, 1-20. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119517
  42. Zolfani S.H., Zavadskas E., Turksis Z., 2013. Design of products with both international and local perspectives based on yin-yang balance theory and SWARA method. Ekonomska Istrazivanja-Economic Research, 26, 153-166. http://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2013.11517613
  43. Zolfani S.H., Pourhossein M., Yazdani M., Zavadskas E.K., 2018. Evaluating construction projects of hotels based on environmental sustainability with MCDM framework. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 57, 57-365. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2016.11.002
Cited by
Show
ISSN
1895-2038
Language
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.17270/J.LOG.2021-313
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu