Zapomnieć, zaprzeczyć czy oswoić? Elementy orientalne w rumuńskiej tożsamości kulturowej (szkic do problemu)

Jurczak, Kazimierz

doi:10.4467/20843976ZK.13.017.1339

Author

Jurczak Kazimierz

Title

Zapomnieć, zaprzeczyć czy oswoić? Elementy orientalne w rumuńskiej tożsamości kulturowej (szkic do problemu)
Oriental Elements in the Romanian Cultural Identity between Oblivion, Denial and Adaptation (an Overview of the Problem)

Source

Zarządzanie w Kulturze, 2013, t. 14, z. 3, s. 253-261, bibliogr. 12 poz.
Culture Management

Keyword

Dziedzictwo kulturowe, Cywilizacja, Tożsamość
Cultural heritage, Civilization, Identity

Note

summ.

Country

Rumunia
Romania

Abstract

Due to the historical and geopolitical context, Romanian culture developed in a hinterland between Eastern and Western Europe. The building of the modern Romanian state in the 19th century was accompanied by a programmatic denial or misrepresentation of its Oriental heritage. This denial began with the Latin-obsessed "Transylvanian School" (Şcoala Ardeleană) and remained an important element in the critical direction of "Junimea" (Titu Maiorescu). In the 20th century, historian N. Iorga studied and evaluated more objectively the complexity and the impact of this heritage on the country's cultural identity, while other intellectuals and theologians (for example N. Crainic, D. Stăniloae, S. Mehedinţi) proclaimed the genuine originality of Romanian culture and stressed the superiority of autochtonous values, based on the Romanian orthodox religion. The Communist regime reinforced this tendency with its "protochronist" propaganda (which claimed Romanian pre-eminence in all aspects of life) with all its grotesque manifestations. The issue of the Oriental heritage has reappeared over the last decades in some debates in the media, in a few articles and papers, but Romanian intellectuals treated it in an inconsistent way and failed to produce a public discourse going beyond the cultural ambivalence or to reassess the role of the Oriental heritage in the Romanian cultural identity. (original abstract)

Accessibility

The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics
The Library of Warsaw School of Economics

Full text

Bibliography

Barbu D., Bizanţ contra Bizanţ, Bucureşti 2001.
Borbély Ş., Mircea Muthu - la ora sintezei, ,,Viaţa românească", 2008, nr 6-7, http://www.viataromaneasca. eu/arhiva/48_viata-romaneasca-6-7-2008/10_cronica-literara/57_mircea-muthu-la--ora-sintezei.html [odczyt: 10.11.2013].
Eminescu M., Icoane vechi şi icoane nouă [w:] tenże, Naţiunea română. Progres şi moralitate, Bucureşti 1999.
Lazăr M., Paradoxuri ale modernizării. Elemente pentru o sociologie a elitelor culturale româneşti, Cluj-Napoca 2002.
Maiorescu T., În contra direcţiei de astăzi în cultura română [w:] tenże, Critice, Bucureşti 1967.
Matei S.A., Boierii minţii. Intelectualii români între grupurile de prestigiu şi piaţa liberă a ideilor, Bucureşti 2004.
Nowak A.W., Europejska nowoczesność i jej wyparte konstytuujące "zewnętrze", ,,Nowa Krytyka", 2011, s. 261-289.
Preda C., Modernitatea şi românismul, Bucureşti 1998.
Rizescu V., Ideologii şi istorii ideologice: tradiţia românească, ,,Cuvântul", 2008, nr 4 http://www.romaniaculturala.ro/articol.php?cod=11589&categorie=5 [odczyt: 12.11.2013].
Stăniloae D., Ortodoxie şi românism, Bucureşti 1998.
Şiulea C., Retori, simulacre, impostori. Cultură şi ideologii în România, Bucureşti 2003.
Tomiţa A., O istorie "glorioasă". Dosarul protocronismului românesc, Bucureşti 2007.

Cited by

ISSN

1896-8201

Language

pol

URI / DOI

BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

Main menu