BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Author
Radmann Barbara Margarita (DEREE - The American College of Greece)
Title
Sustainability or Protectionism in Palm Oil Trade: The Case (DS593) of Indonesia vs. the EU
Source
Academic Review of Business and Economics (ARBE), 2021, vol. 1(1), s. 1-16, bibliogr. 50 poz.
Keyword
Odnawialne źródła energii, Biomasa, Biopaliwa, Paliwa alternatywne, Protekcjonizm handlowy, Handel międzynarodowy
Renewable energy sources, Biomass, Biofuels, Alternative fuels, Protectionism in trade, International trade
Note
JEL Classification: Q2, Q270
summ.
Company
Unia Europejska (UE)
European Union (EU)
Country
Indonezja
Indonesia
Abstract
This paper examines the case DS593 to understand whether the developments in question represent an attempt to further well-justified policy objectives relating to sustainability or represent protectionism in disguise. DS593 came as Indonesia's reaction to the EU Renewable Energy Directive II (RED II) that limits and bans palm-oil imports for the "foreseeable future". Indonesia's strong economic dependence on palm oil exports led it to look at the justification of RED II critically and thus to highlight some inconsistencies. These inconsistencies center around the EU's definition of high and low Indirect Land Use Change (ILUC) risk biofuels. A review of already existing literature on the subject, in combination with the actual WTO agreements were studied to query the issue. It is argued that further deliberation is needed on the side of the EU on what constitutes high or low ILUC risk and on other biofuels apart from palm-oil which are considered unsustainable for EU regulations to not be considered protectionist. (original abstract)
Full text
Show
Bibliography
Show
  1. Anwarul, A. (2021). Bangladesh-India lead acid battery case: Importance of WTO's dispute settlement mechanism and lesson for LDCs. Global Journal of Politics and Law Research, 9(3), 52-58.
  2. Arief, R., Cangara, A., Badu, M., Baharuddin, A., & Apriliani, A. (2020). The impact of the European Union (EU) renewable energy directive policy on the management of Indonesian palm oil industry. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 575. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/575/1/012230
  3. Ayompe, L., Schaafsma, M., & Egoh, B. (2021). Towards sustainable palm oil production: The positive and negative impacts on ecosystem services and human wellbeing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123914
  4. Bai, J., Li, S., Xie, D., & Zhou, H. (2021). Environmental protection or environmental protectionism? Evidence from Tail Pipe Emission Standards in China. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 111, 381-385. https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20211033
  5. Balsa-Barreiro, J., Vié, A., Morales, A., & Cebrián, M. (2020). Deglobalization in a hyper-connected world. Palgrave Communications, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0403-x
  6. Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544-559. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573
  7. Bearce, D., & Jolliff Scott, B. (2019). Popular non-support for international organizations: How extensive and what does this represent?. The Review of International Organizations, 14(2), 187-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09351-3
  8. Bechtel, M., Bernauer, T., & Meyer, R. (2011). The green side of protectionism: Environmental concerns and three facets of trade policy preferences. Review of International Political Economy, 19(5), 837-866. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2011.611054
  9. Bown, C., & Keynes, S. (2020). Why Trump shot the sheriffs: The end of WTO dispute settlement 1.0. Peterson Institute For International Economics Working Paper No. 20-4. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3577935
  10. Carlson, K., Heilmayr, R., Gibbs, H., Noojipady, P., Burns, D., Morton, D., Walker, N. F., Paoli, G. D., & Kremen, C. (2017). Effect of oil palm sustainability certification on deforestation and fire in Indonesia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(1), 121-126. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704728114
  11. Cletus, C., Chrystal, A., & Wood, G. (2004). Protectionist trade policies: A survey of theory evidence, and rationale. In: J. Frieden & D. Lake, International political economy: 32 perspectives on global power and wealth (4th ed., pp. 303-317). London: Routledge.
  12. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/807. Supplementing Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the determination of high indirect land-use change-risk feedstock for which a significant expansion of the production area into land with high carbon stock is observed and the certification of low indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels. European Commission. Retrieved March 5th, 2021, from http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2019/807/oj
  13. Curran, L., Eckhardt, J., & Lee, J. (2021). The trade policy response to COVID-19 and its implications for international business. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 17(2), 252-320. https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-05-2020-0041
  14. Destek, M. (2019). Investigation on the role of economic, social, and political globalization on environment: Evidence from CEECs. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(27), 33601-33614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04698-x
  15. Directive (EU) 2018/2001. The promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources. European Parliament, Council of the European Union. Retrieved March 5th, 2021, from http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2018/2001/oj
  16. EBB (European Biodiesel Board). (2016). The EU biodiesel industry statistics. Retrieved March 5th, 2021, from https://www.ebbeu.org/stats.php
  17. Fargione, J., Hill, J., Tilman, D., Polasky, S., & Hawthorne, P. (2008). Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science, 319(5867), 1235-1238. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1152747
  18. Flach, L. (2021). Recent challenges for global cooperation and the future of WTO, CESifo Forum, 22(2), 8-11. Retrieved March 5th, 2021, from http://hdl.handle.net/10419/232389
  19. Germer, J., & Sauerborn, J. (2007). Estimation of the impact of oil palm plantation establishment on greenhouse gas balance. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 10(6), 697-716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-006-9080-1
  20. Haberl, H., Sprinz, D., Bonazountas, M., Cocco, P., Desaubies, Y., Henze, M., Hertel, O., Johnson, R. K., Kastrup, U, Laconte, P., Lange, E., Novak, P., Paavola, J., Reenberg, A., van den Hove, S., Vermeire, T., Wadhams, P., & Searchinger, T. (2012). Correcting a fundamental error in greenhouse gas accounting related to bioenergy. Energy Policy, 45, 18-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.051
  21. Hinkes, C. (2019). Adding (bio)fuel to the fire: discourses on palm oil sustainability in the context of European policy development. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22(8), 7661-7682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00541-y
  22. Hooijer, A., Silvius, M., Wösten, H., & Page, S. (2006). PEAT-CO2, Assessment of CO2 emissions from drained peatlands in SE Asia. Delft Hydraulics report Q3943. Retrieved March 5th, 2021, from http://wetlands.or.id/PDF/buku/Peat CO2.pdf
  23. Kim, H., Li, P., & Lee, Y. (2020). Observations of deglobalization against globalization and impacts on global business. International Trade, Politics and Development, 4(2), 83-103. https://doi.org/10.1108/itpd-05-2020-0067
  24. Levinson, A. (2017). Environmental protectionism: The case of CAFE. Economics Letters, 160, 20-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2017.08.019
  25. MacIsaac, S., & Duclos, B. (2020). Trade and conflict: trends in economic nationalism, unilateralism and protectionism. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, 26(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1080/11926422.2020.1714682
  26. Mat Aron, N. S., Khoo, K. S., Chew, K. W., Show, P. L., Chen, W., & Nguyen, T. H. P. (2020). Sustainability of the four generations of biofuels - A review. International Journal of Energy Research. 44(12), 9266-9282. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.5557
  27. Meijaard, E., Brooks, T., Carlson, K., Slade, E., Garcia-Ulloa, J., Gaveau, D., Lee, J. S. H., Santika, T., Juffe-Bignoli, D., Struebig, M. J., Wich, S. A., Ancrenaz, M., Koh, L. P., Zamira, N., Abrams, J. F., Prins, H. H. T., Sendashonga, C. N., Murdiyarso, D., Furumo, P. R., ... Sheil, D. (2020). The environmental impacts of palm oil in context. Nature Plants, 6(12), 1418-1426. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-00813-w
  28. Meijide, A., de la Rua, C., Guillaume, T., Röll, A., Hassler, E., Stiegler, C., Tjoa, A., June, T., Corre, M. D., Veldkamp, E., & Knohl A. (2020). Measured greenhouse gas budgets challenge emission savings from palm-oil biodiesel. Nature Communications, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14852-6
  29. Mukherjee, B., & Rathi, N. (2017). Green protectionism: Nuisance or catalyst for cross-border trade (with reference to India). IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 22(9), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2209080106
  30. Mukherjee, I., & Sovacool, B. (2014). Palm oil-based biofuels and sustainability in southeast Asia: A review of Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand. Renewable And Sustainable Energy Reviews, 37, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.001
  31. Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, brexit and authoritarian populism. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108595841
  32. Palmquist, M., Salahub, J., & Zimmerman, D. (2020). Case study: Writing@CSU. Retrieved March 5th, 2021, from https://writing.colostate.edu/guides/page.cfm?pageid=1285&guideid=60
  33. Pleanjai, S., & Gheewala, S. (2009). Full chain energy analysis of biodiesel production from palm oil in Thailand. Applied Energy, 86, S209-S214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.05.013
  34. Richardson, A. (2019). What do Indonesians really think about palm oil?. RetrievedMarch 5th, 2021, from https://www.eco-business.com/news/what-do-indonesians-really-think-about-palm-oil/
  35. Ritchie, M., & You, H. (2021 ). Trump and trade: Protectionist politics and redistributive policy. The Journal of Politics, 83(2), 800-805. https://doi.org/10.1086/710322
  36. Sacerdoti, G. (2018). The WTO dispute settlement system and the challenge to multilateralism: Is the rule of law in peril?. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3343455
  37. Schmidt, J., & De Rosa, M. (2020). Certified palm oil reduces greenhouse gas emissions compared to non-certified. Journal Of Cleaner Production, 277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124045
  38. Searchinger, T. (2010). Biofuels and the need for additional carbon. Environmental Research Letters, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/2/024007
  39. Statista. (2019). Share of Indonesia's crude palm oil exports in 2019, by country. Retrieved March 5th, 2021, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/971586/share-of-crude-palm-oil-exports-by-country-indonesia/#:~:text=Share of crude palm oil exports by country Indonesia 2019 by country&text=In 2019 India was the,to 15.56 billion U.S. dollars
  40. Tang, S., Wang, Z., Yang, G., & Tang, W. (2020). What are the implications of globalization on sustainability? - A comprehensive study. Sustainability, 12(8), 3411. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083411
  41. Tyson, A., & Meganingtyas, E. (2020). The status of palm oil under the European Union's Renewable Energy Directive: Sustainability or protectionism?. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2020.1862411
  42. Van Aaken, A., & Kurtz, J. (2019). Beyond rational choice: international trade law and the behavioral political economy of protectionism. Journal of International Economic Law, 22(4), 601-628. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgz034
  43. Vargas-Hernández, J. (2020). Strategic transformational transition of green economy, green growth and sustainable development. International Journal of Environmental Sustainability and Green Technologies, 11(1), 43-44. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijesgt.2020010103
  44. Walter, S. (2021). The backlash against globalization. Annual Review of Political Science, 24(1), 421-442. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-102405
  45. WTO. (2019). G/L/1348; G/SCM/D128/1; G/TBT/D/52; WT/DS593/1 European Union - Certain measures concerning palm oil and oil palm crop-based biofuels request for consultations by Indonesia (pp. 1-9). WTO DSM.
  46. WTO. (2021a). India etc versus US: 'shrimp-turtle'. Retrieved March 5th, 2021, from https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/envir_e/edis08_e.htm
  47. WTO. (2021b). WTO legal texts: The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT 1947). Retrieved March 5th, 2021, from https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/gatt47_01_e.htm#articleI
  48. WTO. (2021c). WTO legal texts - Technical Barriers to Trade. Retrieved March 5th, 2021, from https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/17-tbt_e.htm#articleXIV
  49. Yildirim, A. (2020). Theorizing cooperation in international trade and the WTO DSM. Value Chains and WTO Disputes, 21-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49094-2_2
  50. Zegeye, A., Worku, A., Tefera, D., Getu, M., & Sileshi, Y. (2009). Introduction to Research Methods. Graduate Studies and Research Office Addis Ababa University.
Cited by
Show
ISSN
2720-457X
Language
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.22367/arbe.2021.01.01
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu