BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Author
Nowak Karolina (Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poland)
Title
On the Concept of Good with Continual Reference to Economy. What Is the Axiological Background of Collaborative Consumption Society?
Source
Research Papers in Economics and Finance, 2022, vol. 6, nr 1, s. 5-17, tab., bibliogr. 37 poz.
Keyword
Ekonomia, Społeczeństwo konsumpcyjne, Ekonomia współdzielenia, Kultura
Economics, Consumer society, Sharing economy, Culture
Note
summ.
Abstract
The rationale for choosing the object of research is the recognition of the socio-cultural validity of new ways of management (New Economy), interpreted as a response to the exhaustion of traditional ways in which societies function, i.e. those based on ideas of growth and ownership. The aim of the article is to analyse selected examples of redefinition of the concept of good in the context of new social narratives and the grounding of certain beliefs related to the idea of degrowth and sharing economy. The article is theoretical and references to contemporary research on cultural philosophy and social analyses of economic practice. A socio-regulatory concept of culture was adopted as a research perspective, and humanistic interpretation was used as an explanatory procedure. Qualitative data was analysed using atlas.ti, concept driven coding was used, and content analysis was limited to concept analysis and the creation of conceptual maps. The research results are supposed to show: 1) the impact of modern forms of economic practices using the Internet and IT technology on the redefinition of good, 2) how this redefinition builds the axiological background of society of collaborative consumption.(original abstract)
Full text
Show
Bibliography
Show
  1. Antinyan, A., Horváth, G., Jia, M. (2020). Curbing the consumption of positional goods: Behavioral interventions versus taxation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 179:1-21, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.08.018.
  2. Banaszak, G., Kmita, J. (1994). Społeczno-regulacyjna koncepcja kultury. Warszawa: Instytut Kultury.
  3. Bauman, Z. (1994). Tod, Unsterblichkeit und andere Lebensstrategien. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.
  4. Bauman, Z. (2010). Żyjąc w czasie pożyczonym. Rozmowy z Citlali Rovirosa-Madrazo, przeł. Tomasz Kunz. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie.
  5. Barthes, R. (1997). Przyjemność tekstu, przeł. Ariadna Lewańska. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo KR.
  6. Baruk, A.I. (2019). The effect of consumers' ethnocentric attitudes on their willingness for presumption. Heliyon, 5: 1-9.
  7. Botsman, R., Rogers, R. (2010). What's Mine Is Yours: The Rise of Collaborative Consumption. New York: Harper Business.
  8. Burszta, W.J., Kuligowski, W. (1999). Dlaczego kościotrup nie wstaje. Ponowoczesne pejzaże kultury. Warszawa: Sic!
  9. Christodoulides, G., Athwal, N., Boukis, A., Semaan, R.W. (2021). New forms of luxury consumption in the sharing economy. Journal of Business Research, 137: 89-99, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.022.
  10. Das, B., Mohanty, S., Shil, N.C. (2009). Categorizing consumers' BUYING behavior: a factor analysis in consumer durable market. International Journal of Business Management, 3, 10.5539/IJBM.V3N9P147.
  11. Debevec, K., Schewe,C.D., Madden, T.J., Diamond, W.D. (2013). Are today's Millennials splintering into a new generational cohort? Maybe! Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 12:20-31, 10.1002/CB.1400.
  12. Fiske, J. (2010). Television Culture. London: Routledge.
  13. Francis, A., Sarangi, G.K. (2022). Sustainable consumer behaviour of Indian millennials: Some evidence. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 4, https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2021.100109.
  14. Gibbs, G.R. (2008). Analysing Qualitative Data. SAGE Publications Ltd.
  15. Giddens, A. (2006). Miłość, seks i inne uzależnienia. In: Socjologia. Lektury, ed. P.Sztompka, M.Kucia. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Znak, pp. 120-133.
  16. Giddens, A., Sutton Ph.W. (2021). Sociology. Hoboken: Wiley John & Sons.
  17. Glava, C., Baciu, C. (2015). Premises of the Educational Implementation of Information and Communication Technologies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 209:3- 8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.206.
  18. Golka, M. (2005). Przyjemność i zblazowanie. In: Kultura przyjemności. Rozważania kulturoznawcze, ed. J.Grad, H.Mamzer. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, pp. 37-56.
  19. Hofmann, S., Øystein, S., Braccini, A.M., Za, S.(2019). The public sector's roles in the sharing economy and the implications for public values. Government Information Quarterly, 36: 1-12.
  20. Jääskä, E., Aaltonen, K. (2022). Teachers' experiences of using game-based learning methods in project management higher education. Project Leadership and Society, 3, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2022.100041.
  21. Jung, B. (2017). Debata wokół pojęcia sharing economy i jego miejsca w gospodarce cyfrowej. Roczniki Kolegium Analiz Ekonomicznych, 44: 149-162.
  22. Kmita, J. (1973). Wykłady z logiki i metodologii nauk. Warszawa: PWN.
  23. Lai, S., Liang, H., Liu, Z., Pu, X., Zhang, J. (2022). Ownership concentration among entrepreneurial firms: The growth-control trade-off. International Review of Economics and Finance, 78:122-140, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2021.11.005.
  24. Mai, E., Ketron, S. (2022). How retailer ownership of vs. collaboration with sharing economy apps affects anticipated service quality and value co-creation. Journal of Business Research, 140:684-692, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.039.
  25. Mamzer, H. (2005). Baranek na talerzu. Ponowoczesne meandry konsumpcji. In: Kultura przyjemności. Rozważania kulturoznawcze, ed. J.Grad, H.Mamzer. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, pp. 27-36.
  26. Marchewka-Bartkowiak K., Nowak K. (2020). Get Tokenized... The Specificity of Personal Tokens in the Context of Tokenization and Axiological Categorization In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Economics and Social Sciences, Sciendo, pp. 823-831, DOI: 10.2478/9788366675162-081.
  27. Pogonowska, B. (2018). CSR finansów w kulturze ekonomii postwzrostu. In: Społeczna odpowiedzialność instytucji finansowych-od teorii do praktyki, ed. K.Waliszewski. Warszawa: Wyd. CeDeWu, pp. 49-57.
  28. Poretski, L., Arazy, O., Lanir, J., Nov, O. (2021). Who Owns What? Psychological Ownership in Shared Augmented Reality. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 150, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102611.
  29. Postman, N. (2002). Zabawić się na śmierć, przeł. Lech Niedzielski. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Literackie Muza.
  30. Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  31. Shareef, M.A., Mukerji, B., Alryalat, M.A.A., Wright, A., Yogesh K. Dwivedi, Y.K. (2018). Advertisements on Facebook: Identifying the persuasive elements in the development of positive attitudes in consumers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 43:258-268, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.04.006.
  32. Shoham, S.S, Gavish, Y. (2017). The effect of acculturation and ethnic identification on consumer disidentification and consumption: An investigation of U.S. Hispanics. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 16 (5): 03-412, https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1640.
  33. Su, C., Urban, F. (2021). Circular economy for clean energy transitions: A new opportunity under the COVID-19 pandemic. Applied Energy, 289, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. apenergy.2021.116666.
  34. Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophical Investigations. Hoboken: Willey-Blackwell.
  35. Xie, X., Zhang, W. (2021). Can information confusion caused by the financing model of new economy companies be eliminated? China Journal of Accounting Research, 14(1): 1-23, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2020.11.002.
  36. Zboroń, H. (2015). Czy ekonomiści wierzą jeszcze w wolny rynek? Prakseologia, 157(2):33-51.
  37. Ziobrowska, J. (2017), Sharing economy jako nowy tren konsumencki, In: Własność w prawie i gospodarce, ed. U.Kalina-Prasznic. Wrocław: Uniwersytet Wrocławski. pp. 261-269. oai:repozytorium.uni.wroc.pl:79622.
Cited by
Show
ISSN
2543-6430
Language
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.18559/ref.2022.1.1
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu