BazEkon - The Main Library of the Cracow University of Economics

BazEkon home page

Main menu

Author
Szostak Michał (University of Social Sciences)
Title
Digitalisation and Virtualisation of the Aesthetic Situation Management : Polish Musical Art Creators during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Source
Journal of Intercultural Management, 2022, vol. 14, nr 2, s. 41-65, rys., tab., bibliogr. 36 poz.
Keyword
Sztuka, Kreatywność, Digitalizacja, COVID-19, Pandemia
Art, Creativity, Digitizing, COVID-19, Pandemic
Note
JEL Classification: D91, J19, L26, M54, Z11
summ.
Abstract
Objective: The characteristics of the creative process in musical arts depends on the form in which the aesthetic situation concerning musical arts takes place (traditional in-person or virtual with digital solutions) dangling on the nationality of the musical art creator: Polish versus non-Polish. The following research questions were asked: 1) How do the forced virtualisation and digitisation affect the quality of the creative process within the aesthetic situation between Polish and non-Polish musical art creators? 2) Which qualitative parameters of the aesthetic situation are lost and which are gained in connection with the creative process virtualisation in the eyes of Polish and non-Polish musical art creators?
Methodology: Qualitative, in the forms of literature review and interviews.
Findings: The study reveals differences in the traditional and virtual creative process between Polish and non-Polish musical art creators. The general differences are insignificant; however, particular components are concerned with essential discrepancies.
Value Added: A new approach to the creative process in musical arts depending on the traditional and virtualised forms of the aesthetic situation. This study can have practical implications for: 1) musical art creators to form their perception of the creative process; 2) musical art managers to form their perception of the complex nature of the creative process of musical art groups they manage; 3) musical art institution managers to form their perception of the multifaceted nature of the creative process of musical art creators involved in the institutions they manage; 4) sociologists looking for deeper understanding of the creative process in musical arts.
Recommendations: Perspectives of the research can be large-scale research based on the methodology invented for this paper and more focused research investigating art creators from different countries, regions, and cultures, divided by age, gender or the extent of artistic experience. (original abstract)
Full text
Show
Bibliography
Show
  1. Böhme, G. (2021). A matter of taste? On the significance of aesthetic judgement for morality. Senses and Society, 16(3), 351-355. DOI: 10.1080/17458927.2021.1874145.
  2. Dahlhaus, C. (2007). Estetyka muzyki. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
  3. Dolšak, N. (2019). Bowling Together: Mobilization of Collective Action by Environmental NGOs. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 8(1), 25-44. DOI: 10.1515/npf-2016-0025.
  4. Gołaszewska, M. (1984). Zarys estetyki. Warszawa: PWN.
  5. Gołaszewska, M. (1986). Kim jest artysta? Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Szkolne i Pedagogiczne.
  6. Guillet de Monthoux, P. (2004). The Art Firm: Aesthetic Management and Metaphysical Marketing. Standford: Stanford University Press.
  7. Gupta, N. (2020). Singing Away the Social Distancing Blues: Art Therapy in a Time of Coronavirus. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 60(5), 593-603. DOI: 10.1177/0022167820927807
  8. Huber, P., & Montag, J. (2020). Homeownership, Political Participation, and Social Capital in Post-Communist Countries and Western Europe. Kyklos, 73(1), 96-119. DOI: 10.1111/kykl.12218.
  9. Ihde, D. (2009). Postphenomenology and Technoscience: The Peking University Lectures. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  10. Ingarden, R. (1970). Studia z estetyki. Tom III. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  11. Ingarden, R. (1981). Wykłady i dyskusje z estetyki. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
  12. Jacobsen, T. (2010). Beauty and the brain: Culture, history and individual differences in aesthetic appreciation. Journal of Anatomy, 216(2), 184-191. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2009.01164.x
  13. Kamolov, S., & Stepnov, I. (2020). Sustainability through digitalization: European strategy. E3S Web of Conferences, 208. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202020803048.
  14. Konkolÿ Thege, B., Littvay, L., Tarnoki, D. L., & Tarnoki, A. D. (2017). Genetic and Environmental Effects on Eudaimonic and Hedonic Well-Being: Evidence from a Post-Communist Culture. Current Psychology, 36(1), 84-89. DOI: 10.1007/s12144-015-9387-x.
  15. Kostera, M. (2014). Occupy management! Inspirations and ideas for self-organization and self-management. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203795033.
  16. Kostera, M. (2019). Organize Ourselves! Inspirations and Ideas for Self-Organization and Self-Management. Mayfly Books. Retrieved from https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/bitstream/handle/item/72058/kostera_organize_ourselves_2019.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
  17. Li, Q., Li, Z., & Han, J. (2021). A hybrid learning pedagogy for surmounting the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic in the performing arts education. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7635-7655. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-021-10612-1.
  18. Mak, H. W., Fluharty, M., & Fancourt, D. (2021). Predictors and Impact of Arts Engagement During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Analyses of Data From 19,384 Adults in the COVID-19 Social Study. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.626263.
  19. Margolis, J. (1986). Dzieła sztuki jako byty ucieleśnione fizycznie i wyłonione kulturowo. In M. Gołaszewska (Ed.), Estetyka w świecie: wybór tekstów. Tom II (pp. 205-214). Kraków: Uniwersytet Jagielloński.
  20. Markowska-Przybyła, U. (2020). Does social capital matter for total factor productivity? Exploratory evidence from Poland. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(23), 1-25. DOI: 10.3390/su12239978.
  21. Marra, C. (2019). The Relationship Between Large Ensemble Participation and the Social Identity of High-Performing Secondary Band, Orchestra, and Choir Students. Sustainability, 11(1), 1-14. Retrieved from http://scioteca.caf.com/bitstream/handle/123456789/1091/RED2017-Eng-8ene.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305320484_SISTEM_PEMBETUNGAN_TERPUSAT_STRATEGI_MELESTARI.
  22. Martyniv, L., Sokolova, A., Kurinna, S., Kopeliuk, O., Sediuk, I., & Khomova, O. (2021). The Modern Problems and Prospects of Music Formation and Art Education Development During COVID-19. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5(3), 670-680. DOI: 10.53730/IJHS.V5N3.2936.
  23. Masood, T., & Egger, J. (2020). Adopting augmented reality in the age of industrial digitalisation. Computers in Industry, 115, 103112. DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2019.07.002.
  24. Moens, B. G. (2018). Aesthetic experience in virtual museums: A postphenomenological perspective. Studies in Digital Heritage, 2(1), 68-79. DOI: 10.14434/sdh.v2i1.24468.
  25. Nelligan, K., & Nelligan, P. (2021). 'It was hard before and it's even harder now': The impact of COVID-19 on Australia's live music and arts entertainment industries. Perfect Beat, 22(2), 144-158. DOI: 10.1558/prbt.19345.
  26. Nicoara, O. (2018). Cultural Leadership and Entrepreneurship As Antecedents of Estonia's Singing Revolution and Post-Communist Success. Baltic Journal of European Studies, 8(2), 65-91. DOI: 10.1515/bjes-2018-0016.
  27. Ossowski, S. (1949). U podstaw estetyki. Warszawa: Spółdzielnia Wydawniczo-Oświatowa Czytelnik.
  28. Soaita, A. M., & Wind, B. (2020). Urban Narratives on the Changing Nature of Social Capital in Post-Communist Romania. Europe - Asia Studies, 72(4), 712-738. DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2020.1718064.
  29. Szostak, M. (2020). Creativity and Artistry in Organ Music. The Organ, 391, 24-31. Retrieved from https://depot.ceon.pl/handle/123456789/19170.
  30. Szostak, M. (2021). Artistry, Management, and Creativity: Links and Common Denominators. Discourses on Culture, 16(1), 23-54. DOI: 10.36145/DoC2021.08.
  31. Szostak, M. (2022a). Art management during the COVID-19 pandemic: visual arts creator perspective. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 10(2), 10-22. DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2022.10.2(1).
  32. Szostak, M. (2022b). Contextual inspiration and motive in persuasive creativity: lessons from artistic improvisation. Discourses on Culture, 17(1), 101-131. DOI: 10.36145/DoC2022.05.
  33. Szostak, M., & Sułkowski, Ł. (2020). Manager as an artist: Creative endeavour in crossing the borders of art and organizational discourse. Creativity Studies, 13(2), 351-368. DOI:10.3846/cs.2020.11373.
  34. Szostak, M., & Sułkowski, Ł. (2021). The Challenges in Identification of Artists-Managers: Consequences for creativity. Creativity Studies, 14(1), 112-124. DOI: 10.3846/cs.2021.13822.
  35. Tatarkiewicz, W. (2015). Historia estetyki. Tom I. Warszawa: PWN.
  36. Węziak-Białowolska, D., Białowolski, P., & Sacco, P. L. (2018). Involvement with the Arts and Participation in Cultural Events-Does Personality Moderate Impact on Well-Being? Evidence From the U.K. Household Panel Survey. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(3), 348-358. DOI: 10.1037/aca0000180.
Cited by
Show
ISSN
2080-0150
Language
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/joim-2022-0006
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu